Dbq Samurai Research Paper

The similarities between samurais and knights were greater than the differences due to the similarity in the hierarchy and the armor they used to protect themselves. The Samurai were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment.” They made up about 10% of Japan’s population. Similarly, knights were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for land.” (Document A) There were about 12,000 knights in England and Normandy, France in the 12th century. Even though Japan and Europe had no communication or access to each other, both areas placed the warrior classes in the middle of the hierarchy and owed loyalty/military services. This shows that the social order of both Feudal Japan and Feudal

The first way that samurais were superior in battle through their way of living. In document A1 written by Christine de Pizan, it states, “Therefore it is not doing wrong if he does for himself the same right he is obliged to observe for one other-which is to say, he avoids his own death.” This shows that in the midst of battle, a knight would be more focused on surviving than trying to kill the samurai, therefore he would be more cautious and have more defense than offense. The knight would be more careful while in battle to try to make sure he would get out alive.

Samurai would begin their training as children, while knights began at around 4 or 5 years old (“Document C”). Clearly these two started the training at a very young age. The hard work would pay off for both these trainees, as they both achieve something at age 14. Samurai trainees would become Samurai at this age. Meanwhile, Knight trainees could become squires (Document “C”).

Samurais were warriors who were well trained and fought for japan. The title “samurais” were given to armed clan leaders in the north. The term “samurai” means “to serve”. The samurai answer to the daimyos. If the samurai disobey their master in any sort of ways, they would disgrace himself and his family. Samurai were trained at a very young age. At 14 they would already be a samurai, but before they became a samurai they had t learn how to ride a horse and other things as well. Their warfare's were filled with all kind of weapons like, the sword, The longbow, and the japanese spear. Armors were also part of samurai warfares. Samurai’s fighting were an important part in the history of their warfare.

Medieval samurai and knights are much more similar than you think. In fact, they were nearly the same thing! As you have been taught that samurai and knights were nowhere near the same, I am here to inform you of the facts. These two warriors were both apart of a feudalism system. They also had an alike childhood as they were both trained for their roles in the world. Finally, both samurai and knights had a life code to live by. These are just the three large reasons as to why samurai and knights were very similar.

The samurai’s and knights were two warriors from two different civilizations from across the world, yet they had many similarities, as well as differences. To start, they both started training in their childhood and participated in spiritual practice. One difference about their training is knights learned how to ride horses and acquired great horse skills. In Document B it states, “A prospective knight’s training began at age four or five with learning to ride a pony.” Similarities in armor between the two warrior classes include the fact that both had very heavy armor. One unique difference was that samurai had their right arm without armor for flexibility while handling a bow. According to Document C, “Samurai did not wear armor on their

Even though they are many miles apart, they still manage to have so many things in common. As said in “Charts created from various sources”, knights and samurais are in almost the same social status in their societies (Doc. A). This means that they were both respected and honored equally. Just by looking at the chart, one can see that they both serve the same people, which were lords and emperors. As again, making them more similar than different. Lastly, by looking at the

While the knight has a superior sword strength and armor bonus, the samurai has a higher mobility and sword draw rate. And putting up with the fighting spirit of a samurai is like taking candy from a skilled warrior. This puts the samurai at the highest point in a fight against a knight. So if one person says that a knight would win give them the reasons

Samurais and knights’ both have comparisons and differences. Some of their similarities and differences relate to physical training. Their rigorous training both started during their early childhood and they were then promoted to a higher status once they were 14 years old. Also, they stressed being loyal and respectful to their master. According to document A, it states, “Samurai were expected to live according to Bushido, a strict ethical code influenced by Confucianism that stressed loyalty to one’s master, respect for one’s superior, ethical behavior in all aspects of life, and complete self-discipline.”

Did you ever wonder if the samurai and the knights are similar or different? The samurai and knights did have differences but they had more similarities. So they do have less differences than similarities. The similarities between samurai and knights were greater than the differences. This can be shown by looking at three areas which are Social positions, training and armor then the Code of honor.

Samurai and Knights are very powerful warriors whose purpose was to protect people. This essay will discuss who would win in a battle. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in armor, training, and code of honor.

Despite being on other sides of the world. One in Japan and one Europe, Samurai and Knights were very similar. Knights earned a living the same way as the Samurai. Both of them were given land in exchange

You may think knights and samurai don’t have a lot of differences? “To keep land in order that developed feudalism” lords gave land to nobles in return for them fighting.Knights and Samurai were at the bottom of the feudal system both were masses.The similarities between Samurai and Knights were not greater than the differences this can be shown by looking at these three area Codes of Honor,Views on Death and Life,and Armor.The first area of important differences was Codes of Honor.”loyal service to his master if he has one(soko)” “ to dishonor knighthood was a great disgrace(Malory)” . Samurai put duty above all disgracing knighthood was the worst being a knight was a privilege.These differences are significant because this shows. That Knights

After reviewing the two sources; Newsela and TCI articles, I have come to the conclusion that samurai and knights are more similar than different in many ways. According to the articles Newsela and TCI, both articles state that samurai and knights both worked for landowners, an example of feudalism. However there are also some differences between the two. For example samurai were from Japan while knights were from places all over Europe. The way samurai dressed was thoroughly different from the way knights dressed on the battlefield. Their training is another example of differences the two crowds had. Nonetheless, the two warriors had the biggest duty of keeping their country safe from foreign

One important way that knights have an advantage is in their training. In document C2 adapted by the PBS Series “Warrior Challenge” it states,”... sent to serve as a page (youth training to be a knight)... This included practice with...wooden swords. He would also refine his horse riding skills...Squires would continue with weapons training...a squire gained approval… to become a knight around the age of twenty one.” This goes to show that to become a knight you started young so they would be training their whole life. So only the best would go out into battle. They had different ranks that pushed them to be proficient to move up a level so knights had to master all skills which gives them the advantage of knowing exactly how to use the sword and to control the horse. Another piece of evidence that supports the claim is in document C1, again