Dbq Similarities Between Knights And Samurai

Samurai and Knights are warriors fighting and serving for their lord. Samurai and knights are both trained, physically and mentally to fight for their lords, however while in a battle, strategies of both make it hard to distinguish who would win. While both warriors are very similar in many ways, Samurais differences such as their, training, weapons, and armor give them big advantages.

The samurai’s and knights were two warriors from two different civilizations from across the world, yet they had many similarities, as well as differences. To start, they both started training in their childhood and participated in spiritual practice. One difference about their training is knights learned how to ride horses and acquired great horse skills. In Document B it states, “A prospective knight’s training began at age four or five with learning to ride a pony.” Similarities in armor between the two warrior classes include the fact that both had very heavy armor. One unique difference was that samurai had their right arm without armor for flexibility while handling a bow. According to Document C, “Samurai did not wear armor on their

The similarities between samurais and knights were greater than the differences due to the similarity in the hierarchy and the armor they used to protect themselves. The Samurai were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment.” They made up about 10% of Japan’s population. Similarly, knights were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for land.” (Document A) There were about 12,000 knights in England and Normandy, France in the 12th century. Even though Japan and Europe had no communication or access to each other, both areas placed the warrior classes in the middle of the hierarchy and owed loyalty/military services. This shows that the social order of both Feudal Japan and Feudal

A long time ago during the middle ages Europe and Japan both developed a class of warriors. These warriors were called Samurai and Knights all though these two warriors had different names and they knew nothing about each other. They both had a lot of Similarities for example there social position, their training, and their honor. They also had a lot of differences but their similarities were greater than their differences. This can be show by looking at three areas document A, B, and C.

Were the similarities between samurai and knights merely a coincidence, or did one culture copy the other? This question has been debated for years as historians studied the feudal periods of Japan and Europe, a time of turmoil with no rulers. Japan’s government was too isolated and couldn’t rule, leading to the rise of independent daimyo. Daimyo were rich landlords who made powerful armies of samurai. In Europe, the Roman Empire, a strong governing body, fell, leaving nobody to govern.

Even though there was one main difference, knights and samurai had similar occupations, so they were more similar than

Hundreds of centuries ago, in the Middle Ages, people, especially warriors, must learn to fight, dress in tons of armor, and most importantly obey similar codes. These powerful, fierce warriors fought for different empires, in different parts of the world! One group was the European knights and the other obtained the name of Japanese Samurai. Both groups must wear layers of uncomfortable armor, obey difficult codes, and most importantly take part in years of training. Although there are numerous similarities between European knights and Japanese Samurai, some differences need to be discussed.

Did you know that samurais and knights are almost the same? The warriors of Japan are called samurais, and the fighters from Europe are called knights. Samurais and knights were more similar because of their honor, armor and training, and social position. Firstly, Samurai and Knights were more similar because they both had honor.

“A student said to his master, “You teach me fighting, but you talk about peace. How do you reconcile?” The master replied, “It is better to be a warrior in a garden, than to be a gardener in a war””(OI). This is an example of the relationship between a samurai and his master. Despite their cold outward appearance, samurai sought peace on the inside.

In about 1000 to 1600 CE in history two warriors were made with a different name and in two different countries. “More than a thousand years ago, a class of professional warriors arose, who swore oaths of loyalty to noble lords and fought to the death to defend them in battle” (Overview). The two warriors were samurai and knights. Samurais were fighting for Japan in the class of military retainers of the daiyomes while across the seas the knights were fighting on horseback in Europe. To keep order in the land both regions developed a system that historians called federalism.There were more differences than similarities and here are some reasons why the differences were greater than the similarities.

From researching about knights and samurai, I believe that in a battle between a knight and samurai, the knight would have a greater chance in winning. This is because knights focused more on fighting techniques and how to improve them, rather than focusing on spiritual beliefs and traditions as well, which is what the samurai did. The knights also had very strong and good armour which helped a lot in battles, while the samurai’s armour changed a lot but wasn’t ever as effective as the knight’s armour. The knight’s weapons were also more advanced and better then the samurai weapons.

Did you ever wonder if the samurai and knights had a difference? Well they did and some differences like for example for the samurai they were allowed to train girls weill the knight did not allow girls to train. This is because knights and samurai are both warriors but have different techniques and views on different things. Samurai and knights were different because of honor and death, training and armor, and social positions. To begin, samurai and knights are different because of their view on death and honor because of that they are different.

Samurai training is more fit for training warriors than knight training. First of all, samaurai training involves all attributes that one needs to have in order to be a warrior. It incorporates both physical and spiritual training, both of which are important for effectively training a strong warrior who is ready for battle. Samurais train through martial arts, which is very beneficial for both the body and the mind. In order to be a warrior you must be fit physically and also mentally. Samurai training stresses this concept in order to create warriors well enough for battle. Samauri training also enforces a strict ethical code , called Bushido, which a samurai must live by. Included in this code are rules about staying faithful to one's

Samurai and knights are not identical, they do have a good amount of differences. For instance, after going through training, samurai were awarded their title and responsibilities at the age of fourteen while knights took on their full responsibilities at twenty-one. Document B points out that although loyalty was important to both Japanese and European warriors, “loyalty towards the feudal lord in Japan was hereditary” but it was not in Europe. This means that in Japan “service of a feudal lord went from father to son” so the relationship between the lord and his warrior lasted for generations. Along with that, although both groups wore full body armor, Document D states that “a knight’s armor could weigh forty

The Knights of Europe and the Samurai of Japan shared quite a few similarities; however, they do also share many differences. One such similarity would be that both the Knights and the Samurais were brave, strong, and loyal to their cause, especially due to both of their trainings starting at a very young age. An example of a difference would be the samurais having a much lighter armor than knights. This allowed for a more agile army. They also ascended to their titles at separate ages, with samurais being at a mere 14 years of age, and knights being 21.