Death And Humanity Of Animals Essay

    Due to the domestication of cats and dogs their populations have skyrocketed. This is due in part to the lack of pet owners acting in a responsible manner. These responsibilities include the spaying and neutering of  pets. These numbers of

Is it ethical for animals to have the same rights as humans? During this paper I will present the views of both sides. I will try my best to give the reader a chance to come to there own unbiased conclusion. I will talk about the key areas of animal ethics. I will present the facts and reasoning behind the arguments over Animal cruelty, testing, hunting, and improper housing. My conclusion will hopefully bring us closer to answering many of the question surrounding “Animal Rights and Ethics”.

As you look at the text of “A Change of Heart about Animals,” answer and then discuss the following questions:

Many people who think that the way that we treat animals in the process of raising those for human consumption are wrong never stop, to think what they can do to stop this problem from further occurring. Furthermore, they make impassioned calls for more “humanely” raised meat. Instead to soothe their consciences they shop for “free range” meat, and eggs; which has no importance. Even if an animal is raised ‘free range” it still lives s life of pain and suffering that all ends with a butcher’s knife. Although many know that over 53 billion land animals are slaughtered each year for human utilization they still tend to eat this meat with no problem. The simple explanation is that many don’t care what happens to animals as long as they are eating and healthy. If they did care then they would what could be a difficult choice; to go without eating meat and selling it in any form.

Today, the discussions about the protection of the animal’s rights have received the attention of many people, many countries in the world. A lot of actions have been made by animal right activists to influence the world. Alex Epstein and Yaron Book, both authors of the “The Evil of Animal ‘Right’,” argue animal right activists use too much violence on their action, which is considered going against the law. Then, the authors give a lot of evidence to prove testing animals are extinct, but using animals for testing gives us new vaccines which make our lives better. Without animals for testing, how can scientists find out the vaccine for diseases? Animal right groups are making many effects to Huntingdon Life Sciences.

The killing of animals has been ubiquitous almost since the creation of the world. Some animals are killed as a sacrifice to a “greater being”. Other animals are killed for food. Finally, some animals are killed for sport, that is, human leisure.

Catholic views on animal abuse is varied greatly. The ‘traditional’ view is that humans are made in a different image than animals. It proclaims that humans have been given ‘dominion’ over nature, meaning humans can use animals in accordance to their own needs (gen 1:28). However, many Catholics disagree and believe that God gave human ‘stewardship’ over the animals, which means we are put on this Earth to look after and care for God’s creation (Luke 12:6). There are a number of Catholic authorities that discourage animal abuse;

People hunt wild animals for a number of different reasons including to control animal populations, reduce invasive animal species, and also simply for recreation. Recreational hunting is one of the most long-debated controversial issues in modern society. The arguments between proponents and adversaries of recreational hunting draw on ethical elements. Those who are opposed to it argue that committing harmful and painful actions on a sentient being is unethical or unjustified, especially when the actions are simply for recreation. Such groups also believe animals that are often hunted have inherent value in ecosystems and hunting such animals detracts from the health of such systems.

Why is it that we as a society condemn the actions of a man against a man but very rarely a man against an animal? I think this question must be understood if we are ever to change the rights animals have. As of yet I don't believe animals have any actual rights. Rather humans have rights that involve animals. If we are to truly allow animals to have rights the same or similar to humans then we must first define what it is that makes us feel as if they are entitled to rights.

Outside of secular views about animal rights, two Christian-oriented views exist on the subject. The first is anthropocentrism. The simple definition of the term is “man-centered” (Cairns 29). Adherents of this view see creation as valuable only if it serves a utilitarian purpose for humanity (Linzey 16). Humans are seen to be the only creatures who receive “direct divine and moral concern,” thus making them superior to any animal (Green 69).

People think they know all there is to know about human suicides, but in reality they don’t. Because if they did, they would know that they need to study animal suicides to help get a better understanding of human suicides. If people knew about animal suicides they could reconsider what they thought they knew about human suicide, and have a whole new light shined upon the subject. Everyone has these assumptions that people who commit suicide were just depressed, while that is true in most cases sometimes it’s for other reasons like: acts of abuse, madness, love, or loyalty. People acknowledging and researching animal suicide could really assist doctors and mental health experts in the long run by better understanding human suicide, which

third world. Singer feels that since the people of the third world are so far

Christopher McCandless, a young American who was found dead in summer of 1992 in wild land in Alaska, wrote in his diary about his moral struggle regarding killing a moose for survival. According to Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, Chris had to abandon most of the meat since he lacked the knowledge of how to dismantle and preserve it (166-168). Not only did he have a moral dilemma to kill a moose, but also had a deep regret that a life he had taken was wasted because of his own fault. He then started recognizing what he ate as a precious gift from the nature and called it “Holy Food” (Krakauer 168). Exploring relationships between human beings and other animals arouses many difficult questions: Which animals are humans allowed to eat and

“The war against hunting will never end” animals that are hunted and will probably never stopped being hunted are birds, squirrels, raccoons, deer, coyotes, etc. in 2015, the eastern cougar was declared extinct due to massive amounts of hunting for trophy. Hunting for sport should at least be controlled if it will never come to a ban. We should be preserving these animals not hunting them. “It shocks me that people find enjoyment and pleasure to kill a living animal.” Imagine the pain and suffering of animal being show it a bullet or arrow and running off and never to be Canned chasing is the executing of a creature in a walled in area to acquire a trophy. The creatures are here and there agreeable outlandish vertebrates; a few, truth be told, have been sold by petting zoos to the canned chasing operation. These creatures don't know not from people. Numerous gatherings that bolster chasing despise canned chasing for its unsportsmanlike practice; supporters are ensured an execute. A few states now boycott canned chasing operations, however the practice is spreading.

Modern day society is, in many aspects, capable of the overexploitation of animals; in a society that has no need for any exploitation of such living creature at all. The topic of animal exploitation goes far beyond the mistreatment of animals; consequently, I will be addressing and analyzing the factors such as: money, superiority, convenience, and tradition. Hunting and killing animals for fun is abode in modern society. Disregarding animals thoroughly, it is evident how our society throughout time treats its own people. Throughout history, people have endured many convivial iniquities and abuses. Past societies have justified slavery, sexual violence, wars, and child abuse by believing, in error, that those who are “different” don’t experience suffering and aren’t worthy of liberation. Just a century ago, human beings labeled as “different” by those straight, white men in power, often faced: torture, exploitation, and even death. We now have laws in place that prevent discrimination based on gender, race, religion, social class, age, and sexual orientation. Most of us are horrified to look back, historically, on the abuses inflicted on said “different” individuals; however, the same iniquities of animals go back centuries. It’s 2017 and we still abduct animals from their families, lock them up, force them to breed, perform, test and give up their desirable body components, all the while taking away everything natural and lawful to them for, the sake of our own curiosity,