Death Penalty Bias

The death penalty has been a controversial topic for a long time, and rightfully deserves to be when a man’s life is in the government’s hand. Although life sentences are the popular alternative, the death penalty is the best solution to heinous crimes because it saves the government money, teaches citizens that they are responsible for their own actions and actually saves lives. Capital punishment has been around since the 18th century B.C., when the code of King Hammurabi of Babylon established death as the penalty for 25 different crimes. The death penalty cannot be seen as “cruel and unusual punishment” since it has been around for so long.

The legitimacy of the use of capital punishment has been tarnished by its widespread misuse , which has clouded our judgment regarding the justifiability of the death penalty as a punitive measure. However, the problems with capital punishment, such as the “potential error, irreversibility, arbitrariness and racial skew" , are not a basis for its abolition, as the world of homicide suffer from these problems more acutely. To tackle this question, one must disregard the currently blemished universal status quo and purely assess the advantages and disadvantages of the death penalty as a punitive measure. Through unprejudiced examination of the death penalty and its consequential impacts, it is evident that it is a punishment that effectively serves its retributive, denunciatory, deterrent, and incapacitative goals.

In conclusion, the death penalty is used in different states and it used for people that the state think deserve it. It is used for when a person convict a really bad crime and it depends on if the person has mental problems and didn’t know what they were doing. People think that the death penalty is wrong and tried to address it but none have be

In 1972, at the time of Supreme Court’s Furman, the majority of public tends to agree with the death penalty. The major reason for support of the death penalty was the serious violent offenders need to be executed in the interest of public safety. However, according to a Gallup poll, supporter for the death penalty dropped from 76 to 53, public started to against the death penalty. Since then, the world has the trend toward of abolishing the death penalty.

The death penalty or capital punishment has been part of our humanity for years and years. Existed since ancient times, according to people a person who has committed an atrocious act, was sentence to death penalty or capital punishment. The death penalty begins back in the 18th century B.C. in the code of king Hammaurabi of Baylon; who was accused of committing 25 crimes. In years past, the punishments where more crucial then today, the execution procedures had no boundaries, forms of killing where endless. Drowning, whacking, “damnatio ad Bestia” which was death cause by a wild animal, dismemberment: dividing the body into quarter-usually with an ax, throwing then off a high place, impalement: one of the most

The people that are against the death penalty have clearly stated that it is inhumane and cruel referring to the eighth amendment, in the constitution. Even though these criminals are tried in front of a judge and a jury of their peers, they are just supposed to sit in jail. The men and women that are incarcerated are there for their crimes and actions. Many lives have been devastated because of the actions of these criminals. The family of the criminal that is incarcerated has to live with the guilt of what he/she has done. The families of the victims have to live with their pain and loss as well. The drugs that inflict death upon the inmates are more costlier than habitation. Pharmacies have refused to sell the inducing drugs because they do not want to associate themselves with the killing of a person, innocent or guilty. There are a lot of inmates sitting in prison for life that society thinks it is easier to house them than to purchase the necessary drugs to put them to sleep. At the end of the day, the perpetrators are still human beings and need to be treated as such.

The majority of the United States’ perspective and value of capital punishment is to punish and kill prisoners, but with that system nothing is accomplished. Plus, there is no evidence that the death penalty reduces crime. In fact, most people on Death Row committed their crimes in the heat of passion, while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or while suffering from mental illness. They represent a group that is highly unlikely to make rational decisions based on a fear of future consequences for their

My initial assumption on how racial bias affects the capital punishment. Racial bias has a major factor in capital punishment case. We have to take into consideration on how society sees and feels about the individual race and skin color. For example, we have Jose who did not commit the crime, but he belongs to a race that society see them as thugs, criminals, people who break the rules and hurt other people. On the other hand, we have Billy an individual who committed the crime, but he belongs to a race that society see them as the good people, people who follow the rules and help others. Jose will have a bigger opportunity to be sentenced to death than Billy just because society sees his race as criminals. Racial bias does have a significant

Death penalty, also known as a capital punishment, is a punishment that requires the government to kill or execute the convicted criminals. Death penalty was inherent feature in American history since the colonial era. Today, not all of the states practice the Death Penalty. As of July 1, 2015, there are 31 states with the Death Penalty and 19 states without the Death Penalty . Some states want to keep the Death Penalty to decrease the crime rate, but some states argue that there is no evidence that Death Penalty deters crime. People are still debating whether the US should or should not abolish the Death Penalty. Therefore, U.S. should not continue the Death Penalty due to the high percentage of wrongfully convicted people and moral issues.

Aristotle once said “the generality of men are naturally apt to be swayed by fear rather than reverence, and to refrain from evil rather because of punishment that it brings than because of its own foulness.” Capital punishment has been intertwined in United States history for centuries with a number of crimes that could lead to the death penalty if convicted, many of them are some form of murder. Since 1977, three thousand and ninety-five defendants have been on death row and of that, only one thousand thirty eight defendants have actually been executed. But the perilous question is whether or not the defendants were sentenced based on solely the facts and nature of the crime or crimes, or were there other contributing factors that influenced the severity of the verdict. There are several social controversies that surround the people who are sent to death row, predominately bias and discrimination issues which are based on ethnicity, gender, and mental health.

However, it is still ultimately a combination of different situations that determine the how influential each factor is in determining the presence of the death penalty. India, even though it was a great British colony influenced by many European ideals, still has the death penalty in use. In this case the Enlightenment ideals were not enough of an influence, especially when the British in India had formerly codified hanging for capital punishment. Now crime, the initial event that created the death penalty is being used to argue against the penalty, as many now argue that the penalty is ineffective in deterring crime, and that a large reason for the support of the penalty comes out of ignorance of the ineffectiveness and the errors of capital punishment. We can now see that every situation is different for every country, the United States have it in practice today, the same with China with the highest amount of sentences every year, the Middle East ties it to religious laws, Europe that has totally abolished it, and the countless other countries that just do not take it into action anymore. In the end it still is up to the governments, to see if we the people will have a say in our country’s

Capital punishment in the United States is becoming more and more of a topic of conversation and controversy; eighteen states have outlawed the death penalty and the governors of three other states declaring a moratorium, meaning they will not sign executions during their time in office (Lovett). The national trend of banning the death penalty should definitely continue. Many criminals on death row are exonerated, making it an unreliable system of punishment. Also, capital punishment is not used equally in cases. The death penalty can also be considered cruel and unusual punishment, which is against the 8th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The death penalty should be abolished because it is not the right way to deal with

One of the biggest reasons why the death penalty should be abolished and is gathering a following by one-hundred-forty-one nations, and eighteen states in the United States is question to as to

Sangiorgio explains in 2011, 139 countries had stopped the death penalty in law. International Review of Law, Computers, & Technology goes to say that in 2010 at least 23 countries had held executions and were using the death penalty. These were in violation of international human rights law. The law has a list of crimes a person can commit to be subjected to the death penalty. It also has the safeguards for the defendants in trials of the death penalty. The laws and safeguards are to keep and push the world to the goal of abolition. This source is useful as it gives valid facts about the laws in countries. The source is unbiased and causes the information to be reliable. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology by Chiara Sangiorgio is useful because it goes with the argument that the death penalty sure be legal for major commited crime.

In America many people believed that death penalty was the constitutional ban against cruel and unusual punishment and the guarantees of due process of law and of equal protection under the law. Now, we believe that the state should not give itself the right to kill human beings – especially when it kills with happiness and with ceremony, in the name of the law or in the name of its people, and now we could vote if there could be death penalty.