Decision Making : Be Chosen By The Management

The decision making process follows the same steps every time a decision is made. The first step is to analysis the problem presented thoroughly (Rossi, Picchi, Di Stefano, Marongiu, & Scarsini, 2015). Questions such as; what is the problem?, and why should the problem be solved? May need to be answered before the person engages in the

Decision-making in the workforce is a process of responsibilities used by upper management to implement, enforce rules, regulations, and maintain a successful environment. Decision-making implemented more effectively by making a plan, thinking it through, accepting more than one opinion and determining what is best. However, decision-making often utilized more effectively by opening doors of opportunities for a suggestion, question, discussion, and feedback. Although, more involvement helps improve understanding, utilize behavior skills and present opportunities for better communication. Everyday life consists of decision-making, the right decision may not always be applied, but ensure room for improvement and opportunity. Individuals approached decision-making in many different ways. As stated by (Jones, Graham, & Bateman, 2006) decision making is a procedure used to recognize a problem, weigh the alternatives and evaluate a solution in which, certain situations will require different approaches to become effective.

She makes the decision to stop investing her economic resources in an unfruitful endeavor and sends Wes to military school. The steps she takes resulting in Wes attending military school depicts the five step decision making model process mentioned in our textbook. The decision making model is an outline of steps an individual uses to recognize a problem and determine appropriate solutions for that problem. The steps to the decision making process model are: Recognizing existing needs, Identifying alternatives to meet those needs, evaluating the alternatives, selecting and implementing those alternatives and reflecting on the resulting outcomes (Moore & Asay,2013,p. 8).

Step-2: Determine the desired outcomes of the meeting: The participants should be made aware of the desired outcome of the meeting. Determination of the desired outcome of the meeting gives the meeting a direction and allows the participants to focus on the agenda.

Step number one is the most important. Without defining a problem, the next steps can’t exist. Without a problem, there is no solution to be made. The main part of a decision is a problem. That is why defining the problem is the most important.

My methodology includes (1) Identify the problem, (2) Look for ethical solutions, (3) Pick the best solution for that particular problem, (4) Execute the solution, (5) Reflect back on the solution and see if it was a good solution and, if not think about how you could have handled it in a better situation. My decision-making is intuitive and comes natural when I am put in a situation but I still have steps that I follow to help me make

The decision making process can also be divided into seven steps, where the first step will basically involve defining the problem. These steps allow for the main issue to be identified, and therefore the manager should make sure that it has been done correctly. After the problem identification stage, we can move forward and identify the limiting factors, and in this the manager should make use of all resources available to do it the best way. Some of the resources include information, time, personnel, equipment and supplies. Using this, managers can be able to identify the factors that might hinder them from achieving their goals.

when the analyst verifies that they understand what the consumer is looking for in the final product. This ensures that the analyst is then asking the right questions during their analysis of gathered information. The second step is, “…generating hypotheses…,” (Heuer, 1999, pg.174), which is where the analyst tries to identify all plausible hypotheses. One thing that the analyst should do during this step is to consult coworkers along with other subject matter experts because they may be able to introduce the analyst to new perspectives. The third step is, “…collecting information…,” (Heuer, 1999, pg. 174). Sometimes an analyst needs to gather additional information above that which was given to them at the beginning of this process. The fourth step is, “…evaluating hypotheses…,” (Heuer, 1999, pg. 175), which is where the analyst tries to, “…develop arguments against each of their hypotheses…,” (Heuer, 1999, pg. 175). This forces the analyst to look at the

Step Six is to select on of the options. At this point, Roberts believes you should have enough information to choose an option. In my decision, I had all the information I needed to make my decision. While, the new opportunity offered a higher salary, the responsibilities where not tasks of interest.

Before any plan is implemented it is of extreme importance to know what resources, technologies and skills are available to be employed when designing a plan. As a result, the first step in the plan is to assess the personnel attached to my team.

The first step in the decision making process is to gather information about the problem. The best method to acquire this information is from the users through

As stated by Prasad (2008), the managers should identify the different choices available in order to get most acceptable outcome of a decision. From searching different alternatives the managers can evade blocks in operations as choices are suitable if a particular idea goes wrong. Khanka (2000) expresses the view that selections can developed from in many ways such as can get from sources like experience, do training other organizations, and take others ideas and suggestions related in problems. Furthermore to improve alternatives solution the managers may investigation the signs of a problem for clues or fall back on intuition or result that stated by Griffin and Moorhead (2010). For an example in marketing department a non-programmed decision is compulsory the manager have to produce alternatives for raise market share. As McShane and Von Glinow (2000) pointed out that in a programmed decision is a standard operations is not to generate choice but can take out from the documented that already saved. Next an organizer should search the mission of a decision. In other words they need to define what is to be accomplished by it (Quick & Nelson, 2013). The decision criteria are important as mentioned by Dubrin (2002). The several criteria are consumers must aware of varies in quality of products, there not happen inflation, workers must consider the quality of improvements and lastly job satisfaction should not be reduce.

All the techniques assisted in following the decision making steps including measuring the impact which is easily forgotten. It is very important to ensure our decision was effective and if it was not. Understanding why the decision was not effective and re evaluating the alternatives and the issues that come into play will help us identify what was missed or overlooked so the problem can get fixed. This also helps ensure the same mistakes are minimized, if not identified so the same issues do not reoccur and something can be learned for the future.

Alternatives analysis. Are there multiple ways to achieve this scope? If so, what are the pros and cons for each alternative?

Once a decision maker has defined the problem, he or she needs to identify the decision criteria that will be important in solving the problem. In this step, the decision maker is determining what’s relevant in making the decision. This step brings the decision maker’s interests, values, and personal preferences into the process. Identifying criteria is important because what one person thinks is relevant, another may not. Also keep in mind that any factors not identified in this step are considered as irrelevant to the decision maker.