The process of decision-making, and the models used during this process, has long been a focus in the field of Urban Planning. Part of this focus has been a discussion regarding which decision-making model is best suited for this profession. One often employed but highly controversial model for decision-making found in this field is the rational planning model. This model, which was first adopted by planners in the 1950’s and 1960’s, focuses on addressing the problems of cities and their inhabitants through a series of comprehensive and rational steps. This multi-step model assumes that following a sequence of interdependent steps will result in finding the best possible solutions for any proposed problems.
Within the field of urban planning this model of decision-making is most often applied to the creation of comprehensive master plans, and it often begins with first establishing a vision for the city and creating a set of goals, in order to reach this ideal vision. This first step also includes working to identify, comprehend, and define problems that should be addressed within the master plan. One important aspect of this entire decision making process is ensuring a variety of voices are heard, so that decision makers have a shared understanding of any problems facing potential stakeholders of this process, and so that they can work towards implementing common goals. The next step of the rational planning model involves gathering information and developing a set of
Most of us have to make decisions from the time we wake up until the time we go to bed at night. Answering questions like what should I eat for breakfast, can I make that yellow light and should I go to the gym or go out for pizza all require us to make a choice or a decision (Robbins, S.P., Judge, T.A., 2009). At work I am challenged with collaborating with managers and other leaders to make decisions based on scenarios and events that occur in the hospital.
The ability for one to make rational decisions is vital, and this is especially true for decisions that can have enormous consequences. The process for making rational decisions is tedious, it requires one to have the opportunity to deeply process, evaluate, and re-evaluate available options. This suggests that rational decisions must be made in the absence of external parties because external influences are capable of preventing individuals from processing information for themselves. Otherwise, this would likely result in the individual coming to rash conclusions that cater to the external parties. Unfortunately, under most circumstances, it is a challenge to make rational decisions, because as social animals, we constantly expose
Before making an important decision, it is very important to set up clear goals of the decision. In the prompt, the town of Surette must decide whether to convert the abandoned building into a private office space or a new community center. The town has developed two distinct goals they want to accomplish through the decision. One of the goals is to gain revenue from the conversion of the building. The other goal is to increase the standard of living for the citizens of Surette. This is a very difficult decision because each option has its strengths and weaknesses. Nevertheless, we can simplify this decision by employing the rational decision making model discussed in our textbook. In order to reach a rational decision, I will review the information provided in the
Rational decision is a state of being agreeable to reasons. The correct decision is not just reasoned but it is also optimal for solving a problem. Mr Weekes, the operation manager, employed series of analytical steps to review possible outcomes for problems by discussing it with managers to come up withdevise particular courses of action.
1. The four-step model for decision-making; See, Judge, Act, and Evaluate, applies onto the storyline by providing more insightfulness and reflection onto the decisions each character performs. In such cases, Sam uses this method by somewhat agreeing to let his daughter, Lucy, go into the foster care system. This was shown when he later confides and agrees to see Lucy on a limited amount of times each month. Even though at first, he was upset and furious having his only daughter taken away from him, he slowly managed to admit to this term when he recognized Lucy's happiness and safety.
Over 443,000 people die from smoking each year! Smoking, alcohol, drugs, and much more, are all preventable yet they all kill hundreds of thousands of people each year. With, D.A.R.E. there are fewer and fewer people who do these things and overall fewer deaths due to them. Now I will tell you about the D.A.R.E. program.
The city of Huron public works has been evaluated through a QSPM matrix to come up with several strategies that would be effective to the organization. A QSMP matrix is “an analytical technique designed to determine the relative attractiveness of feasible alternative actions. This technique comprises Stage 3 of the strategy-formulation analytical framework; it objectively indicates which alternative strategies are best” (David, David pg. 378). There were many strategies tested in the QSPM matrix to come up with the top two strategies, which are building a new water treatment plant or remodeling the current water treatment plant. In order to decide which strategy was best fitted both of the strategies were put into an EFE and an IFE matrix. The outcome of an EFE and IFE matrix, SWOT analysis, and QSPM matrix, will determine which strategy will be best to implemented for the City of Huron.
I believe the planning model that better described the event in this case is rational planning. The underlying factors are the issues at hand that surrounded the idea of going to war. Although it seem rather quick that Americans went to war however, it was done with step by step evaluations. According to the rational planning, the problem was clearly identified. At that point, it was devastating attack of the Iraqi. Right away, American were expected to retaliate. The obvious second step was not to go to war which would have been alternative solution but the President fears that they will strike again if American did nothing. They also thought about the consequence of their action and others opinion was looked upon but the consequences was overlooked due the massive attacked that was committed. Then the plan of action was to strike and invade Iraq without no effective plan (Starling, 2011, p.215). The plan they had implemented was turned around against them because other insurgent came and they started committing many atrocities against the citizens of Iraq (Starling, 2011, p.214).
A department head who does not display qualities of a good leadership is a recipe for disaster. Dealing with someone who is incompetent and takes credit for your job can be frustrating and exhausting at times. There are ways to deal with such situations at work and this paper deals how to manage
It combines many factors or steps in policy process, which usually needs much time to develop public policy. Probably, the most influenced idea about the process is coming from theoretical point of view of policy process. This method is known as rational models. The rational models compromise with the ideal process of policy.
After the choosing the alternative it must be implemented with careful planning that highlights a clear plan of what will happen and also take time to identify potential problems and potential benefits that could result from implementation.
The rational decision-making model describes a series of steps that decision makers should consider if their goal is to maximize the quality of their outcome. In other words, if you want to make sure that you make the best choice, going through the formal steps of the rational decision-making model may make sense. The following are the steps taken to come to a rational decision: 1. Identify the problem, 2. Establish decision criteria, 3. Weigh decision criteria, 4. Generate alternatives, 5. Evaluate the alternative, 6. Choose the best alternative, 7. Implement the decision, 8. Evaluate the decision.
Chapter 1 walks the reader through the need for easy methods of policy analysis and planning as our problems in society become more complex and difficult to solve. This chapter starts with the introduction of a set off systematic procedures or what is known as policy analysis methods that can be used to solve our complex problems. Then there is a subgroup of these methods that are basic methods, which assists with quick results and in making good policy decisions (Patton, Sawicki, & Clark, 2012, p. 3). Some disagree that there is a set of procedures that can be used to assist in solving problems however a standardized methodology has developed and been applied (Patton et al., 2012 p.
This report will discuss about the approach to rational decision making process. It discusses how an everyday problem faced by management can be tackled by using
These 8 propositions provide a basis from, which to explore the ramification of public participation, both as a concept and as a decision-making technique. The need of public participation in planning is more clearly expressed by Bolan (1967), “No matter how we improve our substantive knowledge of how cities function, and no matter how we improve our capabilities in information handling, operations research, and prediction, if there is not a corollary development of community’s capacity for improved decision-making within the framework of democratic process, there is the real possibility that heavy investment in the current forms of city planning techniques will have been in vain.”