Declaration Of Independence Research Paper

American colonists should support the Declaration of Independence and the Patriots in the Revolutionary War. Great Britain was taxing the American colonists because of Britain’s great debt from the French and Indian War. Britain made the quartering act, the stamp act, townshend act, and the tea act. This is taxation without representation and it was unjust. The Patriots were angry and rightfully so. The King was making the colonists pay taxes on imported goods to decrease his country’s debt, the Patriots were outraged and wanted freedom.

And by doing this, it might be a good idea in the king’s eyes, but it’s not the best idea in the peoples. Which is whom you are ultimately trying to please. In the grand scheme of things that is what the British were missing in their “perfect” colony, pleasing the people. (DCT 2)

This is the same argument that Paine makes when he explains that the ruling of England is flawed because the King of England’s “speech, if at may be called one, is nothing better than wilful audacious libel against the truth, the common good, and the existence of mankind; and is formal and pompous method of offering up human sacrifices to the pride of tyrants” (Paine 58). As we can see, both authors argue that the King of England is a tyrant; this is one of the many reasons that the colonies must unite and break away from England.

In the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson exposes the British King of his tyrannical antics toward the colonies to his readers.

After the French and Indian War, Britain did numerous things to provoke the colonists to revolt against the tyrant king, King George III. The British taxed unfairly and enforced ridiculous laws on the colonists. the colonists rebelled due to anger and disgust toward Britain, and through pride and patriotism toward their future country, they fought for independence. King George III was a cruel and unfair man. He treated the colonists wrongly and ungraciously.

For two decades prior to the American Revolution, the Americans developed a series of grievances against the British government for the policies restricting the American colonies. In the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, those grievances were listed including British charges of trading and taxations. The Americans stated that the British have no right to restrict the colonies, therefore, there are enough reasons to separate from the Great Britain. However, the colonists blamed and faulted King George III for incidents caused partially by the colonists themselves. My perspective on this issue is that the charges leveled in the Declaration of Independence against the King were mostly valid with few exceptions.

English colonizes were held under rule of the King and Parliament. As time went on the settlers began to search for independence. Taxation without representation was a leading cause for the fight for independence to commence. Eventually the colonists won their independence. The King and Parliament could of done a multitude of things to retain control of colonial affairs and minimize the trend towards independence and some policies may have succeeded, but the colonists truly believed they deserved freedom.

Unjust Actions From the beginning of the colonies there was always unrest on whether or not they should be dependent on England. This was a debate that was had amongst colonists since before Thomas Jefferson drafted the Declaration of Independence. Declaring their independence was the colonies last standing offense to the King before he decided that England needed to step in. To the English monarchy, the colonies were unjust in declaring independence from them due to their ownership of the lands where the colonies lie; however speculation may tell Americans today that Jefferson was just in his actions against the crown.

One may ask “Were the American colonists politically correct when rebelling against England? Was it their ethical duty to rebel or should they have tried to resolve the matter peacefully?” One could ask themselves this question, “What would I do if I had been in their situation? This question can be answered as follows.” Samuel Adams said it best when he said, “Among the natural rights of the colonists are these: First, a right to life; Secondly, to liberty; and Thirdly, to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can.” The colonists tried reasoning with the King through correspondence, but to no avail. Left with very little choice, the colonists really had two options: First, to stay under the rule of a tax-happy King, or two, fight. Picking a fight with the world’s strongest empire would be no easy task! Not to mention, the King lives over three thousand miles away, and he could care less about the colonists’ wellbeing. He thought they were below a peasant! So, did they have a right to rebel? One could only come to one conclusion, and that was the same conclusion the colonists came to FIGHT!

The colonists claimed that “[they] have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over [them]... They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity.” and in the end the British sided with the monarchy. The colonists felt betrayed by this and decided that there was no point in trying to comply with the monarchy no

Second, the king had a right to be mad at the colonists! When the New York Assembly met in 1766, they REFUSED to follow the Quartering Act the king out in place. It was as if you were directly insulting the king. And yet the colonist still got mad about the Declaratory Act. The king is tired of the colonist disregarding his authority.

If we had gotten representation from the British, things would be much more peaceful. The colonies have kept trying and trying with peaceful tactics but we only get turned down and ignored. Everyone would like to keep the peace, but we’ve run out of peaceful options. I realized this after I listened and read about what Patrick Henry and Thomas Paine had to say. The British rejected our peaceful offers and doesn’t care about us. The colonies should be independent because we have the right to govern our own country and not have to deal with unfair taxes.

Normally this is a bad sign of a society, with no representation the colonists can't have any say in what their tax money is being spent on. However, the colonists didn't truly want representation. At that point in 1775, the colonists who wanted to separate from the British Empire were in positions of power where they could give an offer to Britain. The offer would be that in return for paying higher taxes, they could have a seat in parliament. Obviously for such low tax rates they don't deserve a seat in parliament compared to the taxes Britons are paying. The separatist colonists wanted to not have representation just so they could say how bad the British Empire was. Would you support a group who essentially lied to get sympathy? Another reason others might say that supports having a revolution is that the British Empire was involving the colonists in arguments and wars the colonists didn't want. "... Great Britain, [will] directly ... involve [America] in European wars and quarrels; and [make us enemies[ with nations, who would otherwise seek our friendship..." (Thomas Paine, "Common Sense") That seems like a fair argument, "Why should us American colonists get involved in wars in Europe?" But if you're in the British Empire, shouldn't you expect that your military will be needed in wars fought by your Empire? I mentioned previously how Britain defended the

In the Declaration of Independence it states that all men and woman are created equal. Although that some may consider the ideal more important. Unalienable Rights, Rights to alter or abolish government, and consent of government none of these ideals would be able to happen in America if we didn’t have equality.

After the petition of the colonies stating that Great Britain should give consent when comes to taxes, we got response that if we don’t reverse our positions we will be dissolved to self-govern. When we didn’t reverse our positions, they immediately dissolved every single one of the assemblies, which is the most appalling decisions a king can do. You shouldn 't silence the voice of opposing concerns; not only does it shows that you want a quick and easy solution, but also that you rather be surround by people who only agrees with you. He dissolved assemblies from all thirteen colonies, with representatives for each one of them, which further prove how ignorant he is if that doesn’t give him a reason to at least negotiate. How can we make changes if I will be immediately kick off my own position, how will I be able to get my voice heard?