Deduction Vs Deductive Reasoning

With your second argument is more of a deductive argument as premise one and two are true and the conclusion is guaranteed. So this would be a valid deductive argument. For an inductive argument the conclusion should

Criminal profiling has become a very popular and controversial topic. Profiling is used in many different ways to identify a suspect or offender in a criminal investigation. “Criminal profiling is the process of using behavioral and scientific evidence left at a crime scene to make inferences about the offender, including inferences about personality characteristics and psychopathology” (Torres, Boccaccini, & Miller, 2006, p. 51). “The science of profiling rests on two foundation blocks, basic forensic science and empirical behavioral research. Forensic science includes blood spatter analysis, crime scene reconstruction, and autopsy evidence. Empirical behavioral research identifies offender typologies, relates crime behaviors to suspect

The purpose of this study is to identify the accuracy of FBI criminal profiles, to evaluate the effectiveness of the released profiles, and to analyze the most useful aspects of the criminal profile. The data collection and analysis that will form the foundation of my research will be a qualitative procedure that will answer the following questions: How accurate are FBI criminal profiles? How effective are the FBI criminal profiles? What aspect of the FBI criminal profile has most contributed to the apprehending of the criminal?

Induction and deduction will be codependent on each other in order to make an argument stronger. Induction lends itself to making conclusions based on several pieces of information gathered, whereas deduction uses syllogisms and enthymemes to make a straightforward conclusion. Writers can use these powerful tools to develop arguments and explanations that would make sense to the reader and proof how failsafe their argument is on

Nomothetic profiling is deemed helpful in identifying patterns through various forms of studies to gather general, typical, common and/or average characteristics of offender groups. It’s these characteristics that through the studies investigators can hypothetically infer in the way that it’s not necessarily in each individual case that is addressed, but they actually represent the theoretically possible and the probable circumstance to develop understanding for further interpretation from gathered intelligence. Therefore, problems arise when nomothetic methods are used inappropriately to make overly confident inferences or conclusive interpretations because regardless the overwhelming data gathered from various groups of mass murders and

The three foundational assumptions of criminal profiling are homology assumption, behavioral consistency, and behavioral differentiation. These theories are connected to each other and work together. The homology assumption is the assumption that criminal behavior that is similar means offenders will have similar characteristics as well. Behavioral consistency means that an offender’s behavior when committing crimes will be consistent. Behavioral differentiation means that the behavior between offenders is distinguishable from other offenders. The homology assumption is the primary theory, and the others work with this theory. Although there is very little research that has been done to support the homology assumption, the little research done

Criminal Profiling Although criminal profiling is not the flawless and magical process that entertainment television portrays it to be, it is a valuable investigative tool that aids in the analysis of crimes and the manner in which they are committed. This behavioral and investigative method is useful in helping investigators to accurately predict and profile the characteristics of unknown criminal subjects or offenders. Criminal profiling is based on the belief that it is possible to predict certain characteristics of an offender by examining the specific details of their offenses. By combining the knowledge of social and forensic sciences, profilers can make useful predictions about individual traits or behaviors an offender likely possesses.

As the crime rate grows in this country and the criminals become more sophisticated, the investigative tools of the police officer must also become more sophisticated. One such sophisticated tool does exist and may help answer the question commonly voiced by police and others at the scene of a violent crime, "Who would do a thing like this?" This tool is the psychological assessment of crime profiling. (Ault & Reese, 1980) Police Departments and Government agencies and offices across the world are now using criminal profiling on a daily basis to help aid in catching dangerous criminals.

Personality traits of offenders are classified on the basis of evidence from crimes scenes that profilers believe to be related to one another. Therefore, “given the very nature of profiling, controlled experiments and hypothesis testing becomes an improbable task” (Woskett, Coyle, and Lincoln). Basically this means that criminal profiles may, at times, be correct; there is no way of accurately or efficiently testing the hypothesis of the profiler. This lack of being able to test the validity of the hypothesis could lead to the wrong person being apprehended for a crime they did not commit. Also, according to James A. George, “…the fundamental assumptions of offender profiling have no scientific support, the scientific community has challenged its methodology, denying its general acceptance, and peer reviewed journals fail to find empirical support for the theory.” Based on what George said, it appears that even through extensive research and testing there has been no success at proving that criminal profiling is a reliable process based on fact and exact science. Being considered a non-scientific process is bad enough, but also faulty research was used to create the criminal profiling classification

According to Ebisike “Offender profiling is a crime investigation technique whereby information gathered from the crime scene, witnesses, victims, autopsy reports and information about an offender’s behavior is used to draw up a profile of the sort of person likely to commit such a crime” (Ebisike, 2007). Since it was first introduced in 1974 by the FBI, the method of profiling has been defined in many ways by theorists, critics, the media and the general public. Throughout the evolution of this method there have been profiles created that have successfully described the criminal and some that have not. The argument put forward in this essay is that criminal profiling isn’t a reliable method of investigative work, however it is in some sense

Supporting Argument- I find this to be deductive because the premises of reptiles being cold-blooded and snakes are reptiles match to the

Criminal profiling has been made known as one of the most useful techniques in offender profiling, a technique practiced to help define the behavior of an offender before they reach the height of their criminal career.

forces such as the FBI and the police use criminal profiling as an investigative tool aimed at helping them identify or predict characteristics of criminals who are not yet identified. Criminal profiling as an investigation tool allows investigators to compile and establish the right description of the criminal implicated. Investigators can also use geographical profiling to establish the location of the criminal. The criminal profiling procedure is used by detectives to satisfy certain needs in the investigative report. For example, to enable law enforcement officers to get a high profile of the criminal conducted on the basis of psychological and social aspects of the offender with the purpose of understanding the circumstances of the crime being committed. Next is providing the investigative bodies with a perfect psychological assessment of the criminal. Based on the information gathered from the crime scene, a profiler can acquire on the mental status of the offender that is very helpful in homicide cases since the reason for carrying out such an act is effectively identified. Criminal profiling mostly focuses on the crime scene because the organization or disorganization of the criminal is established because there are criminals who have a tendency to plan things ahead before implementing them.

Criminal profiling also known as offender profiling is an investigative tool used to create a psychological portrait of suspects and determine the location of a suspect through their behavior and personality. Offender profiling is used when the suspect’s identity is unknown on cases dealing with serious crimes such as murder, sexual assault, kidnappings, etc. There are two main directions of criminal profiling, the first is is the profiling of a criminals personal characteristics and the second is geographical profiling. Profiling of a criminal’s personal characteristics is used when they want to find out who the suspect is and what possessed them to commit the crime. Criminal profiling is centered around how the brain works and somewhat stereotyping suspects to find their location or who their next victim may be. Psychological studies have shown that the personality and other mental developments of the offender can lead them to make certain decisions when committing an offense. Criminal Profilers of today have endless amounts of resources available to them besides evidence from just the current crime, past cases, criminal studies, interaction with past criminals and personal experience

Inductive logic is the form to achieve a conclusive and specific knowledge through general rules. It is the urge of humans to construct patterns of observation through time. We all use simple induction all the time; for example. We assume that because the sun has