Degree of Globalisation of Ford Motor Company

Global competition in recent years has had a great effect on the American automotive industry. More efficient cars being developed overseas posed a threat to local companies’ market shares (Investopedia, 2015). Market shares of largely well-known companies such as General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler all suffered losing between three and ten percent of their previously held market shares between 2000-2014 to foreign competitors (Investopedia, 2015). For decades, the United States had the best technological advances in the industry and it was very difficult for competition to survive. In response to this, companies overseas invested significant amounts of money into researching new innovations and ways to produce better automobiles than the United States (Investopedia, 2015). Also, because of the difference between currency values, the cost of labor in other countries is lower than here. This allows foreign companies to be able to sell their products at lower costs and attract customers through undercutting their competitors’

The presence of Ford Motor cars is very strong in terms of global aspect, because it operates in six continents. So they are present all over the world.

Organizations that strive to be a leader in an industry must look beyond their domestic boundaries and expand into international markets. The Ford Motor Company remains the second largest automotive manufacturer in the United States and fifth largest automotive manufacturer in the world with Toyota leading the way. This essay will address the Ford Motor Company’s strategic approach to compete internationally and identify which resources and capabilities make it attractive to compete internationally. Additionally, the Ford Motor Company’s diversification strategy options will be described. Lastly, we will identify how chosen diversification strategy options would lead to a strategic fit for the Ford

The Ford Motor Company and General Motors have greatly influenced and shaped the global automobiles industry over the 20th Century. While there are other big car-makers both in the United States and elsewhere in the globe, the two companies have been the commonest and significant players across the entire sector. This research focuses on an argument of how competition between both companies has benefited them.

Increased globalization is the direction that all major multinational corporations are moving towards. Ford had made a good attempt at making a world car that proved to be partially successful in the beginning of sales. The company has learned that locational specialization is an extremely important aspect to selling globally because of the differing personal preferences and legal demands.

The auto industry adopted new globalization trends that could steer the restructuring of global manufacturing in order to meet the challenges of global economies. There was the need to improve on efficiency and maintain a competitive level in the automobile industry. Automotive manufacturers from Asia, Europe, and the US adopted global trends such as integrating low- income countries into the global division of labor. The aim of the automobile industry in adopting globalization was to enable it shift from the economies of scale to the economies of scope. The industry started focusing more on manufacturing capabilities that could enable it meet the increasing marketing demands. The rapid changes in technology-forced automakers

This paper examines the expansion of General Motors overseas in its various phases, as well as triggers for internationalization and the problems faced during the process. The paper also considers what benefits have been achieved through international growth, and how the company can be classified with regards to Bartlett and Ghosal’s 4 typologies. Finally, the paper discusses the concept of a “world car,” meeting the demands of customers across the globe.

Ford in 2011 is on the rebound, having recovered from the darkest hours in the late 2000s. The company for the company is that many of its competitors are also rebounding, and there are significant long-run changes in the automobile industry. Ford needs to determine a strategy that will take the company through the next decade, and improve the company's competitive position. The company has four of the top fifteen best-selling cars in America, but also needs to set strategy globally, as many of the best automobile growth markets are overseas. Another strategic consideration is that CEO Alan Mulally remains in the process of changing the organizational culture at Ford, which had become stagnant and unresponsive to the changes in the industry environment.

Over the years, the U. S. auto industry's market has been experiencing fluctuations due to many reasons including: price, quality and foreign competition. General Motors Corporation (GM) which had been the leading car and truck manufacturer had been experiencing declining market share and facing stiff competition from both U.S manufacturers and foreign imports such as the Asian auto producers that included Toyota, Honda and Nissan. The main reason for increased foreign competition was that foreign cars were more fuel efficient, smaller, less expensive, and often more reliable than their American counterparts.

Differentiation requires a constantly changing product line and is more successful when the company is able to offer a portfolio of products that complement each other, which enriches the experience for customers and satisfies a variety of consumer needs. And when differentiated products truly satisfy customers’ unique needs, the company is able to charge premium prices. For customers to be willing to pay a premium price, however, Ford's products must truly be perceived as unique in some way. The ability to sell goods or services at prices that substantially exceed the cost of creating the differentiated features will allow Ford to outperform its rivals and earn above-average returns.

In 1913, Henry Ford revolutionized product manufacturing by introducing the first assembly line to the automotive industry. Ford’s hallmark of achievement proved to be a key competence for the motor company as the low cost of the Model T attracted a broader, new range of prospective car-owners. However, after many decades of success, customers have become harder to find. Due to relatively new threats to the industry, increasing numbers of cars and trucks are parked in dealer lots and showrooms creating an alarming trend of stagnation and profit erosion. Foreign-based automakers, such as Toyota and Honda, have expanded operations onto domestic shores and, in turn, have wrestled

The United States Automotive industry has been dominated by five major auto manufacturers: GM, Toyota, Ford, Chrysler, and Honda. As globalization increases the domestic automotive market (GM, Ford, Chrysler) suffers from foreign competitors. Although with high entrance barriers the market suffers little to none from new entries. There are several reasons for this the largest being capital. It takes a lot of capital to obtain manufacturing plants, raw materials, as well as to hire and train employees. PASTEL Analysis

The main driving force behind the decision of BMW to turn to globalization was competition from global companies in Germany, the United States and Japan who are major competitors in the luxury segment. The automobile industry is highly globalised with many major manufactures operating all over the world. Automobiles built in one region are sold, with necessary changes, around the world. The main force for global convergence was the virtual disappearance of the national manufactures being squeezed out by the international giants and the standardization of markets across international boundaries. Forced by international regulatory bodies at regional level and fuelled by ever more intensive global communication.

Government persuade and pressurize automotive assemblers to increase local content but the reality of the situation is that there local manufacturers aren’t as competitive as they would like to be or they aren’t as competitive as those suppliers and automotive assemblers internationally. The reason being is supply chain issues cause inefficiencies that impact a local automotive assembler to gain competitiveness, (Naude & Weiss, 2011).

The characteristics of the global motor vehicle industry are a boom in certain places and a bust in others all due to economic conditions in different nations. Four years after tow of Detroit Michigan’s big three went into bankruptcy American car makers are going “full throttle” with sales in August hitting an annual rate that if substantiated can take them back over 16 million and that is a rate that was last hit before the economic crisis and 80% higher than 2009 when GM and Chrysler went into bankruptcy. The opposite is happening in Europe being in its sixth year slump now and with a weak economy, high petroleum prices and an aging