When viewing this painting, one’s eyes focus immediately to a barefooted woman wearing a tattered yellow dress. In one hand she is carrying the French, and in the other a rifle. She is not alone. This woman is leading a revolt against the government during the French Revolution. Behind her are hordes of diverse people following her into battle. There are people of all sorts. There are members of the French bourgeoisie who are wearing suits and top hats, members of the more educated class that are wearing the bicorne hat (type of hat Napoleon wore,) and members of the working class. All around them lie dead bodies, but these people do not care for they are trampling them. On the right side of the painting, part of a building in the distance is visible. The rest, however, is covered in a thick smoke. Beside the woman is a kid flaunting two pistols, and beneath her is a man crawling towards her whilst staring up at the French flag.
The use of color in this painting
…show more content…
The use of emphasis in this painting is one method that Delacroix uses to, in essence, emphasize the greatness of the liberation. No matter how many times you look at this painting, every single time you will be drawn into the center with the woman and the flag. The woman carrying the flag is the obvious focal point in this piece. She is the object that is the center of everybody’s attention. This is why Delacroix deliberately made her the brightest and most standout piece of the painting. He did this to glorify the revolution by making it the one thing everyone is fixated on. Another design method he uses is balance. The variation between the dark and light colors creates a since of hope. The brightness of the flag symbolizes this hope of liberation. Everything else in the painting is darker. This balance is showing the light (Liberty) breaking through the darkness (French Government) like the sun peeking through the clouds on a rainy
CLS- The painting depicts the people in Guernica in an abstracted composition of multiple figures describing the lose of the wounded and the chaos the war that result in a tragedy.
I was not looking hard enough, behind this painting there is history and made me look at it differently. I really liked how he used the history in his artwork and unique style of using different colors and scenarios usually not seen, like the mixing of Gods and Mortals mentioned in paragraph four. I’m sure like any other painting that has to do with history there may be two sides of it. Some people may agree with what the painting shows and others may oppose. I believe this painting shows a little bit of the history of France. I believe the community of france took this painting as a well explanatory paining and there is really nothing negative of this portrait. To other cultures it may be hard to understand the story behind at first because we may not know who the figures are at first but once you study it and maybe search them it will all start coming piece by piece and coming to the realization of the actual work and what is behind
A mother cries in agony while holding a small child in her arms, most likely one of the many victims who lost their lives. On the far right side of the painting, you can see a woman on her knees, examining the skies as if she is expecting another bomb to fall from the sky. It is evident that her right leg is already injured. Violence and anguish is displayed in this famous piece of art.
Concerning color, there is a stark contrast between the figure on the painting and the background. More specifically, the figure of the woman is predominantly delineated in white color, especially pale, ashen white, as far her apparel and facial complexion are concerned, while there are also various hues of grey, with respect to her hair and accessory feather. These white and grey shades are vividly contrasted with the prevailing red and crimson hues of the background (viz. the drape, armchair, and table). Moreover, one can detect colors of dark green (jewelry), some beige on the left (pillar), and darker or lighter shades of blue on the right side of the canvas (sky), which all in concert and in addition to the subtle purple hue forming the sun or moon exude a certain dramatic sentiment. Also, there is brown, which often easily segues into gold (viz. books and attire details respectively). The main contrast of colors between white and red would be interpreted as serving the purpose of rendering the figure of the woman, and especially her face, the focal point of the work, despite, paradoxically enough, the lush red shades at the background. Bearing that in mind, the significance of the woman’s face will be enlarged upon later, when discussing aspects of her identity.
He is extremely angry which can be seen from the way he leans forward threateningly. His wife shows more restraint and sits back, straight backed against her chair and stares at her husband sulkily. The wife’s stoic demeanour and with her arms defiantly crossed at the chest suggest an empowerment which the man is uncomfortable with. Here we see two contrasting halves to the painting. On the left we see anger, discord and noise in the man and the child at his feet. On the opposite side we see calmness with the quiet dog and control with the restrained woman.
In The Third of May, 1808, you can see the lines of the guns from the men on the right drawing your eye to the men being shot at on the left. While the soldiers wear mostly dark clothes the few to the front grows lighter in their hue as to not be forgotten by the bright light being shown on the victims of the painting. Behind this scene, there are people in dark clothing or ones that almost fade into the hill behind them, that are cowering in fear.
The portrait is displayed horizontally with a gold trimmed frame. The subject is a female that looks to be in her early 20’s sitting upright on a large brown chair. If the viewer travels up the painting the first indication of the woman’s class is her satin, blue dress. The saturated blue shines and falls in the light like water. Paired with the dress are her exceptionally detailed endings to her sleeves. The lace is even painted as though it is translucent, allowing a little of the blue dress to show through the sleeve. Flowers throughout history have symbolized innocence of a woman and her virginity. The repeating theme of flowers, in the sleeve cuffs and ribbon) in the woman’s attired suggests her purity or innocent nature. Another very details section of the painting includes the corset/torso details. The sewing suggests texture in the torso with small beading in between. Towards the top of the chest in the center, the female seems to bear an extravagant, ribbon piece with a tear drop bead in the center. The light pink
In the top portion of the image, you see that Jesus and the two other individual simply have fabric tied around their waists to cover their genitals. But one other has a different color of loincloth, unlike the other two. I do not why one of them has a different color of loincloth. The soldiers also have a metal vest with designs , you can see them if you look closely. Towards the middle of the painting, Jesus body is the brightest out of all three. On the right bottom part of the painting, are the Virgin Mary and St. John, they are looking to their left at what is unfolding before their eyes.
This painting depicts an event of human and political aspects that greatly interested Gericault who chose to display it at a monumental scale to portray the horrifying explicitness of the Senegal, 1816 shipwreck in which the captain had deserted his crew and passengers, leaving them to die.
The painting was commissioned by Baron de St. Julien, a wealthy member of the assembly of the French clergy. The artist depicts a man lounging playfully in a luscious green bush watching a young woman happily swinging in an elegant and colorful dress. Both subjects seem overjoyed and caught in the moment, escaping from reality for a fleeting moment. The woman is swinging with such vigor she has lost her shoe, but this doesn’t seem to make her upset. The artist uses softer pastel colors throughout giving the scene a dreamlike feel. The woman is the focal point and has a bright elegant dress. This painting expresses a happy moment where there is no care in the world, and all is peaceful.
I find it interesting that in the painting there is a young girl with her hand covering her face, it seems she is sad about the bird dying. It appears that her father’s hand is around her, and he is explaining something to her. There is an even younger girl who must be the other girl’s sister. She looks worried and has an arm around her sister. The painting is suspicious and a lot of the people in the painting seem frightened. The older man in the middle looks really scary. Everyone seems engaged in conversation except the man in the middle who is looking at the viewer. The people in the painting are dressed rather nicely and seem well-to-do. It is night time in the photo because there are candles and a moon out the window. I wonder why this
The painting does not show the French soldiers facial expressions, but there is a full details on the expression of the brutality the Spanish went through. It shows a several emotion which shows men covering their eyes, while others are praying .The painting shows hate, horror, fear, and the civilization. The color of the painting indicates the mood of the story behind it. The color is very dim , melancholy in the sky and the face of the people. The light in the painting shows forgiveness for the French soldiers. I found it odd that a painting from the 19th century still talks about the way humanity still is today. People in power seems to be unable to feel human emotion. It make complete sense that brutally will never
In the front of the painting we see the main figure raise his hands along his head while his eyes and his mouth is widely open in horror way, and screams of seeing something scary and dread. In the background seems two people wearing hats, and behind them a landscape of hills.
This painting was created 5 years before the French Revolution occurred and thus this painting has been seen as the spark that ignited the thought of revolutionary thought (Roberts, 2000). This Painting was Jacques- Louis David’s first royal commission, and he chose a scene from Roman history in order to portray a political statement (Roberts, 2000). The painting displays 3 soldiers who are known as the Horatii brothers whom were chosen by Rome to defeat the Curiatti or to die trying (Schnapper, 2009). The man in the center is the father of the three brothers holding three swords of his sons and raises his hand in promise or sacrifice that his son will achieve their task (Schnapper, 2009). Finally, the women on the right who are already grieving for their sons as if they are already dead (Schnapper,
This painting was a direct reflection to what was happening in the July Revolution. Delacroix looked out of his window and saw this happening right before his eyes and was inspired to draw this painting.