Executive Summary SITUATION: Once the largest computer manufacturer in the world, Dell has slipped to third in line behind Lenovo and HP. With sales of their once famed laptops and PCs quickly declining, their market share has taken a hit as a result. Lenovo and HP are not only to blame for Dell’s demise, Apple and Google have established new markets for smartphones and tablets that has shifted demand to these new toys away from laptops/PCs. These new disruptive technologies are a cheaper and thus more accessible substitute to the old guard (laptops and PCs). COMPLICATION: With Dell’s old core business in rapid free fall and competition eating away at its margins, Dell shares have plummeted from their all-time highs. As a result any …show more content…
The 5 year PEG Ratio of Dell is 2.17 versus 1.12 for Lenovo and 1.645 for the industry. It can be inferred from the Peg Ratio that Dell’s EBIDTA growth rate for the next 5 years is going to less than its peers and the industry. From the ROIC chart shown below, it can be seen that Dell’s ROIC has decreased from 2008 to 2010 and increased in 2011 by about 10%. However, the ROIC is projected to decrease to 2014 and then remain stable @ 20% for the next 10 years. Based on the APV and comparable multiples valuation, it can be seen that the future of Dell looks bleak as it stands today. The Personal Computers (PC) industry is not a great industry to invest in unless you are ready to innovate and adapt to the changing demands of consumers. Adding this to the fact that consumers are slowing moving away from PCs to smartphones and tablets makes it a no-brainer for Dell to make significant changes to its business model as soon as possible DEAL STRUCTURE Dell’s 2013 interest coverage ratio has decreased from about 44 in 2011 to 17.6. This trend is a bit of a concern as the risk of bankruptcy increases with more debt. Dell has about $21.8 billion in liability obligations and $10.9 billion in excess cash ((Yahoo Finance). At a $13.75 per share, an equity amount of $3 billion is needed to complete the deal. It is recommended that Michael Dell stays on as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) after the LBO deal.
The two most important factors responsible for fueling the movement toward drug regulations in the 20th century were that patent medicines were abused and the associated drug use with minority groups (Levinthal, 2012). With little or no restrictions on drugs by any government agency, patent medicines had a broad definition and were distributed in various ways. Interestingly, the medicines were a far cry from today's medicines as there were no restrictions that required all of the ingredients to be listed on the container the medicine was distributed in. Furthermore, a popular trait was the traveling medicine show that included a "pitch man", whose responsibility was sale his patent medicines (Levinthal, 2012). As the traveling medicine shows became more popular and more drugs were sold, the number of drug-dependent Americans grew and resulted in the establishment of the Pure Drug and Trade Act of 1906, of which made it a requirement to list ingredients on all medicines distributed (McBride, VanderWaal, & Terrry-McElrath, 2002).
Nearly all of us are familiar with the witty rhymes and colorful drawings of Dr. Seuss. Simply hearing the name will evoke thoughts of colorful fish, a small mustached man that lives in the woods, and of course the Cat in the Hat. However, before he started his career writing children’s books, Dr. Seuss was a successful political cartoonist for several major news outlets in the United States prior to the outbreak of World War Two. The cartoon discussed will be one released right after Great Britain's policy of appeasement is put into place. Dr. Seuss’ aim was to convince the American people that Great Britain’s plan would never work.
more discounts then Dell may be able to afford, or increase spending in areas of investment for
How, if at all, would your answers to Question 3 chang e if Dell also repurchased $500 million of common
Dell Computer Corporation was founded in 1984 by Michael Dell. From the early 1990s until the mid-2000s, Dell was ranked as a PC market leader relying on their distinctive marketing pattern “Direct Model” which undertook direct communication with customers and provided customized products. Recently, the PC industry is facing inconceivable worldwide competition, and Dell is gradually losing their competitive advantages by using its direct model in critical business segments. The company is facing shrinkage of growth, increasing competition, declining quality of customer service, and limitation of expansion. These issues have an enormous impact on Dell’s position as a technological giant in the PC industry.
In this paper I will be discussing two norm violations I witnessed, and one I committed. When I first received this assignment I had to get familiar with the terminology and understand what different types of norms there are. Norms are expectations of “right” behavior for a person to follow in society. Society created social norms to provide a guideline for members of society to follow. If we lived without these rules it allows people to not be accountable for their actions. Social norms are ideas or ideas that are expected for society members to follow. Each culture, and subculture has their own social norms to follow. According to James Henslin, (2015)(2015) “Values are the standards by which people define what is good and bad, beautiful
And in Michael Dell’s own words about the future: “The epicenter of the company has really shifted to these other areas and away from the PC,” Dell said. “If fiscal year ‘11 was about getting operationally fit, then fiscal year ‘12 will be about leveraging this strength.” (Ricadela, 2011).
* In 1985, Dell shifted it’s company’s focus to assembling its own brand of PCS & business grew dramatically with $70 million(Rs.364 crores) in sales at the end of the 1985.
as a percentage of revenues. Dell is well managed and knows how to control their costs. The company is on top of every detail and there are no surprise costs to harm the company. (Part 2, Item 7, Form 10-K, Dell Inc. 2011) The net income performance of the company has been excellent for fiscal 2011 with an 84% increase from the previous year. This big increase in net income resulted in a 1.6% growth in profit margin and a 2.5% growth in ROA (return on asset). Higher revenues and good cost control are responsible for these growths. Another reason for the growth in net income is the change in the business operation of the company. Its service operations are expanding and have a lower cost than manufacturing the products. Fiscal 2010 had a decrease in net income of 42.2% mainly due to the drop in revenue and the acquisition of Perot Systems. Dell is planning to
Dell Company has a successful business strategy. As it is following cost leadership strategy. Its success story is hidden in cost proposition, delivery, and unique customization. In response to the high performance and better chances for growth Dell is applying two way strategy parallel to one another.
In 2001, Dell’s ROA and ROE drop to the lowest point through the life of the case. This large drop is due to the net income declined (42.77%) in 2001
The most important questions facing Dell was – how to grow and at what cost. The purpose of this research is to analyze Dell’s core strategy, its working capital management, and come up with a plan to finance its future growth by evaluating its financial statements.
By exploring the possibility of going private, Dell appears to hope that it can finally fix the problems that have led to a 40 percent plunge in stock price over the last five years.
DELL’s PC and laptops business have strong market share in the United States and is fast gaining market share worldwide with a double-digit growth rate in countries such as India and China. DELL is ranked the world's number two PC maker with a market share of 13.7 percent for the 2nd quarter of the year 2009, according to the industry tracker IDC. Due to the recent global economic downturn, DELL posted a 22% decline in PC revenue, which made up to about 60% of DELL’s overall revenue (Source: Reuters 7/10/2009 - Appendix 1.1). PC and laptops are DELL's core businesses. DELL’s PC business continues to grow in Asia and the focus will be in China and India for the next few years.
PC industry is characterized by fast declining ASP year over year. Together with the increasing component costs from 2009, both Dell and HP are facing squeezing profit margins (HP 2010; Dell 2010). In the first quarter of 2011, HP’s gross margin for its Personal System Group (PSG) is as low as 6.4% (Epstein 2011). Similarly, Dell’s gross margin of PCs is often 3 to 5% (Wang 2010). This indicates that if both