Democracy Or Vote Based System

There are two types of democracies, direct democracy and representative democracy. As one would expect, the two are very similar. Direct democracy and representative democracy are both systems of government in which power lies with the people whom are govern though the power of voting. The power of voting is how both systems emphasis the importance of people’s rights. There is also a common sense of self-empowerment to the people being govern in both types of government due to this right. Furthermore, there is a mutual prominence towards majority rule in the two systems.

Democracy is a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, and is one with representative institutions and a rule of law.

Over the course of the Revolutionary War, the people of the colonies fought for freedom, liberty, and a fair government. They were pursuing a better society, and wanted a non-tyrannical administration. They needed their government to reflect this. The Constitution addressed and embodied the ideals and opinions of the people during the Revolutionary Era, which included a need for a representative democracy, checks and balances on the government, and a protection for the citizen’s rights.

In a democracy the citizens have the right to choose who represents them in government by having elections. This is what the government use to let the citizens make a decision on the individual or group that are going to represent them in Parliament, the citizens make their vote by choosing from a variety of potential candidates and they will vote for the candidate that they believe will

In a true democracy, the general vote is the deciding

In the majoritarian vision of citizen control, concentrated power is necessary. Majoritarian elections act as

The government we have today revolves around people. We vote for all of our government officials therefore we are a democracy. The majority

The guideline where the people are the definitive wellspring of overseeing power and choices are made focused around majority rules guidelines. For example we vote for our government officials. This is important because citizens have a voice and that voice is heard through voting (Patterson, 2013).

However, the extent to which this model is still democratic can be questioned. On the contrary, the delegate model believes that a representative should faithfully convey view of constituents. This form of representation can be said to better support democracy as it uses the classical concept of democracy: popular sovereignty, the principle that there is no higher authority than the will of the people (). Democracy is where every single person has a say in the affairs of a country. If only the representative’s judgment is voiced, is it still considered to be democratic?

For instance, if the parliament, acting on public opinion, was to make a law severely curbing the rights of some minority, the supreme court has the right to struck it down as unconstitutional, irrespective of the public support behind that law. This principle takes into account the notion that popular sentiments should not always be reflected in state policies, especially when they contradict the law. The process of judicial elections, however, is entirely based on public support as the basic legitimizing criteria for the justice system and fails to consider the fallibility of popular opinions. And, when judges are elected to their offices, the cannot work irrespective of public opinion which helped them gain their seat in the bench. Therefore, election of judges contradicts the basic principles of democracy as well as independence of the judiciary.

According to (text 1 lines 25-30) “Ideally, a democracy will take into account the interests and views of all the citizens. But if some regularly vote while others don’t, officials are likely to give greater weight to the

Voting allows the participation of all types of a country's individuals to contribute to the development of their society. However, it is often times beneficial only to a population's majority. Thomas Jefferson once called this a “tyranny of the masses,” which

A weakness of democracy is the “Tyranny of the Majority”. This is an inevitable pitfall, because in a democracy, the power is vested foremost in the people the constituting the society itself. Alexis de Tocqueville wrote on this concept:

It has also been suggested that a basic feature of democracy is the capacity of eligible voters to participate freely and fully in the life of their society.[14] With its emphasis on notions of social contract and the collective will of the eligible voters, democracy can also be characterized as a form of political collectivism because it is defined as a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives.[15]

one essential conviction, expressed in the word democracy itself: that power should be in the hands of the people. Although democracy today has been slightly inefficient in this idea, with the wealthy, elite class challenging this right, “it nevertheless claims for itself a fundamental validity that no other kind of society shares….” To completely understand the structure of democracy, one must return to the roots of the practice itself, and examine the origins in ancient Greece, the expansion in the Roman Empire, and how these practices combined make what we recognize as today’s democratic government.