Democracy vs Dictatorship

Many countries in the world have democracies, but there are still some where there is a dictatorship. In a dictatorship, nobody is free or safe and nobody will

Comparing the U.S. governments ability to meet the needs of its citizens compared to that of a dictatorship is far superior. A dictatorship is designed to benefit one or few individuals that have achieved power using capital or force. Their only concern is for themselves and what will increase their power. The U.S. form of government is restricted to the power of the constitution.

Joseph Stalin used his intellect, and power, to outmanoeuvre his rivals to become leader of the Soviet Union. Using carefully planned propaganda including, painting, statues, and a series of cultivated posters Stalin immortalised and glorified his leadership. These state-manufactured images created a ‘cult of personality' around him, subsequently, creating an image of a heroic worshipped figure, who was associated with every aspect of soviet society. Stalin controlled the media and according to the historian Moshe Lewin, Stalin single handily, ‘become the system,’ (Lewin in Pittaway, 2008, p.137.)

In conclusion, dictatorship is where one person is in full control of everything and the people must do what the dictator says. The people don’t have very much freedom and the dictator may do anything he pleases. Dictatorship has been around for a long time but still is a role in our lives

The idea of democracy is the power of the people that they have democratic rights such as the doctrine of democracy and the freedom of expression. In a complete democratic society, everyone is born equal. People not only have power in democracy but also have a responsibility to the society. In addition, democracy relates with Constitutions and election. There are a lot of democracy societies except the United States. As a democratic country, the United States and Canada have similar political and rules, but still have differences.

If you compare Oligarchy vs Democracy on how stable a government these can provide, then certainly dictatorship wins hands down. Oligarchy government often resort to violent methods to curb any kind of public uprisings to protect its power and ruling status in the country.

Joseph Stalin, from the time that he was a low level revolutionary to the years that he spent as the dictator of the Soviet Union, always knew what he needed to do to achieve his goals. His organized rise to power allowed him to gain a steady flow of followers who would support him for decades to come. Stalin received a minor government position in 1917, but by the time a new leader was needed in 1924, he “had turned the largely routine post of Party general secretary into the most powerful office in the Soviet Union” (“Joseph Stalin) and “had built a personal empire for himself through his control over committee appointments at all levels . . . expand[ing] the leading Party organs with his supporters, who then voted against his rivals”

Following the timeline of Josef Stalin’s ruling as a leader of Soviet Russia, it can be seen that his positive accomplishments brought Russia from a period of

A democratic republic best protects the people against tyranny when compared to a pure democracy. A pure democracy is deficient because a large group of people can put one person in office who can abuse his power to be unfair to minorities. In a democratic republic, you have multiple representatives, elected from each state, who meet to administer the government. The group of representatives can be influenced by each other. Therefore, there is no real difference between a democratic republic and a pure democracy. However, in our current system, we are governed by two parties, which produces the likelihood of tyranny if a party was to become more strong than the other. Having two central parties also reduces the number of beliefs shared in the government. Therefore, several smaller parties would benefit the people the most because it diversifies our government and prevents the rise of central power.

Stalin served as the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from 1922 until 1953(the year of his death). Initially starting with a limited power position, Staling rapidly gained power and became the party’s declared leader.

I am going to discuss a constitutional democracy form of government and a dictator form of government. We in America live under a constitutional democracy. First, a democracy, as most know is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people (Constitutional Democracy, n.d.). A constitutional democracy affords protections of the people from those elected to lead the government ensuring their rights are not violated (Constitutional Democracy, n.d.). These protections come from the foundation of the created society and backed up by law (Constitutional Democracy, n.d.). Unlike a dictatorship, our democracy may be overseen by those elected to power, however, the people ultimately retain that power (Constitutional Democracy, n.d.). In a way, there is a form of dictatorship in our

Stalin influenced the world of politics since the start of his reign in 1924. Stalin’s economic policy is believed to be one of the best models for poorer countries and many think that he single-handedly destroyed socialism. Most importantly, it is thought that Stalin “molded the features that characterized the Soviet regime” (Gale Staff, 5). His strict policy inspired many of the modern-day rulers in their grapple for power. However, his political impact is only a speck of dust compared to his other prominent actions. Stalin is most famous for the Great Purge, the execution of thousands of citizens due to his paranoia, and his military operations were one of the main causes for the rise of the Cold War. Like Hitler, many articles were written and numerous studies published about Stalin’s life and intentions. Today, his name is met with a mixed reaction. While some admire the way Stalin helped Russia regain its title, most often he is criticized for the harsher laws he placed on the people (Gale.org, 3). His visual reputation has also been quite influential. When he was alive, Stalin blurred out all of the scars from his childhood sickness in photos. He also walked with a limp that usually heavily concealed. For this reason, when people met Stalin they were often disappointed and left with a lesser opinion. Learning from his mistakes, modern executives often hide their flaws to ensure utmost

A dictatorship is a government ruled by one commander. An example of this is Iraq. Saddam Hussein is the dictator of Iraq. Whatever he decides becomes law. Dictatorships are similar to absolute monarchies in that they are very oppressive to the people of the country. The major difference between the two is that absolute monarchies are families inheriting their power while dictatorships often result from military takeovers or from an elected official who refuses to step down from his elected office.

Democratic and non-democratic are the two main types of regimes. They differ on the ways they govern over the people. Democratic and non-democratic regimes can be compared and contrasted by the institutional structure, rule of law, methods of political control, and political socialization.

As systems of government, Democracy and Dictatorship exhibit key differences in how leaders are elected, power is distributed and how people are governed. Nations that have a democratic element are those where the people have a substantial say, through a system of voting, about who is representing them in the government, and where leaders are not governing for life. In