Dental Negligence Research Paper

Prompted by another practitioner, the government intervened in the case of Dr. John Roger Lund, a Saratoga, Calif. dentist who was arrested June 6, 2016 for performing unnecessary procedures on his patients and bilking insurance companies out of hundreds of thousands of dollars (Dentist). The 28 counts of felony insurance fraud included factitious charges and superfluous procedures done on patients with healthy gums and teeth. One individual had 18 root canal procedures completed by Lund during a five-year period, which is considered to be overly aggressive treatment. Due to patients’ lack of awareness, Lund and many other practitioners are able to manipulate the modern, insurance-driven, healthcare system and operate with a sense

Patients’ have a right to receive high standards of performance from the dental practitioner they consult (Wilson, 2009); hence, such conduct must be actively demonstrated in order to earn the trust and confidence not just of the individual patient but the community. However, there are many concepts and issues that guide how dental professionals practice, such as: interprofessionalism and commercialism versus professional ethics. For these reasons, the dentist has a responsibility to make sure that their competence to practice is maintained through a governing body, which establishes standards of entry, conduct and performance to ensure safe dental care and quality dental outcomes (Rattan, 2007).

After all, we have gladly provided exceptional care in our offices – how can we ethically fail to address the need for ongoing dental care for those who may have many years still ahead of them but lack the ability to come to us? (Brown, 5)

The plaintiffs, George C. Simkins, Jr., Milton Barnes and W. L. T. Miller, are dentists (practitioners) licensed to practice and practicing dentistry in the City of Greensboro, North Carolina.

Several legal issue may also be applied to this case. The reason the hygienist did not agree with what the dentist wished was because he based his chosen treatment on the fact that “..it has been that way for a long time, and I think we can maintain her with a cleaning periodically” (Rosenblum, 2010, p. 170). Though the previous charting did not reflect this explanation. If the periodontal disease progressed and the patient sought legal recourse, the dentist could be considered negligent and be found guilty of malpractice (Cameron & Zarkowsi, 2010, p. 125). If another dentist reviewed the dental history and charting, it is quite likely that he would take a different course of action.

Dentist’s arguments: The dentist was successful in his defense at first instance. This is because the trial judge found that it couldn’t be definitively stated that the dentist was dishonest or fraudulent as opposed to simply incompetent. Since the allegation of fraud could not be relied on for the purpose of vitiating the consent given by the plaintiff, then the trial judge concluded that the tort of trespass could not be made out but that a claim in negligence

So what happens when need a dental specialist and your very own dental specialist is out of the workplace or on vacation? What happens if you endure serious damage that includes your head, jaw, or mouth and you require proficient restorative consideration? What happens if there is an issue with the work you've had done on your teeth or mouth and you can't get to your own dental specialist sufficiently quick?

It is important for every dentist and dental hygienist to be knowledgeable of the prevention, diagnosis and management of a medical emergency in a dental office. Being well prepared for any occurrence can make a difference in the outcome for the patient. It is essential to know what tools are available, how to use them and what the warning signs are. Some emergencies are very common in a dental setting considering the stress it can cause, anxiety and lengthy appointments. Communication with your patient is key to a smooth appointment. Many hints can come from simply doing an overall appraisal and talking with your patient. Being aware of patient’s fears and medical history can positively impact the outcome of the appointment and help you be prepared for any medical emergency.

In April 2003, after retaining Amy Reisen, Esq., in Millburn, New Jersey, paying $3,500.00 for legal help with many violations. She mails Colleen McCarthy copies of my dentist 's statements that remain past due. Ms. McCarthy calls Amy Reisen many times, pushing for Mike 's meeting demands. After twice confirming May 22, 2003, at 9:30am, Colleen McCarthy enters two hours late, at 11:30, not with Mike but with Jimmy Newman, his late father, wasting $525.00 of my paid attorney time.

Dear Department of public Health Respectful top quality Investigation unit Mr. Gary Griffin, and the Department of Human rights & quail opportunity My name is Mr. Steven Omar Bryan amen, “first my I request for a full Investigation and may I also request for a civil court trial including myself and all parties involved in the reason for my teeth’s being Cracked an great part of my injuries head aches and pain to my future and my Healthy and lively hood please carefully review my Oral Argument and Patient Record.

The medico-legal community has experienced a rise in medical negligence claims in the past six years, as patients are becoming more aware of their rights regarding health care and medical treatment. South Africa has struggled with medical negligence law in the past as there were inefficient procedures for patients to make such claims. However, attorneys in South Africa are bringing experience and professional legal services to the table to help the public receive justice and compensation after suffering from medical negligence.

On 2/4/2016, you had a dental appointment, but DENCAP could not find you in their system. Therefore, you called Harbor Health and were advised that you have dental insurance as your premium was paid, however a spreadsheet that included your name wasn’t sent to DENCAP. Consequently, your appointment was canceled. Afterwards, you called DENCAP twice and DENCAP contacted Harbor Health but no one addressed your concerns or returned your call. You expressed, that you were unable to use your insurance and attend appointments due to errors made by Harbor Health and asked to be contacted to discuss these matters

Our discoveries revealed some delays in dental care services. There was up to 3-4 month wait time for inmates to be seen by the dentist for follow up care after the triage of sick call was completed. The audit team found 110 inmates on the wait list for follow up services. It is the team’s assumption that the dentist was not as familiar with the dental standards and procedures outlined in the ACA performance-based standards 4-ALDF-4C-20.

“Too many times we see special needs patients who have been held down, papoosed and head-boarded while receiving brief treatment at other offices. While we understand that the care of these individuals can be challenging, they shouldn’t be shortchanged by a quick cleaning, no x-rays or an extraction instead of saving a tooth because that office can’t stabilize the individual in a comfortable and humane fashion.” (Dr.Kaminski) Patients with disabilities and special needs deserve the same kind of dental care as a patient who does not. Special needs patients require more care and attention than patients that do not have special needs or disabilities. Patients with medical conditions that

The allegations made by patients against the healthcare practitioners were true, hence umbrella of healthcare institutions and practitioners had to bear the liabilities arising from the actions of medics. The outcome was that the patients suffered because of recklessness of the healthcare professions.  They ought to adhere to stipulated rules and regulations but this did not happen. As a consequence, the National Health Service Litigation Authority was compelled to pay out more than £36.3 million as compensation for the victims (Toolan et al. 348).