Deontological Ethical Framework

This paper primarily consists of a personal response to a few questions about ethics in business. Describing the meaning of ethics sets the criteria for evaluating if actions are ethical. Looking at current and future career work, the concept of ethics is applied to predict ethical challenges. Based on this coursework, and outside research, resources will be identified that may be beneficial when business ethical challenges arise. The coursework on ethics covered law, conflict of interest, accounting, environment, finance, marketing, management, reputation, and corporate social responsibility. All of these topics are corporate concerns. Some topics may present dilemmas during the course of business. The responses in this paper

In order to make an artificial intelligence (A.I) program the most human, it must include deontology in its framework, because the robot would have a clear sense of right and wrong, its actions would have both positive and negative effects, and it would emphasize its value as a human being. Deontology based ethics are “concerned with what people do, not with the consequences of their actions” (BBC Deontology). Because the A.I would have a strict moral code, it would not stall in the limbo of “it depends”. Deontology provides certainty, so the A.I would always know what is a morally right action and what is not. This could yield positive and negative effects because some people would agree with the A.I’s reasoning when it came to making a decision,

Deontology is an ethical framework, which states, that the rightness and wrongness of an act depends upon the nature of the act (Burkhardt & Nathaniel, 2014). People believe that healthcare disparities are not an issue in America today. Although, many minorities are receiving healthcare, the level of care revealed is not equitable. Today, minorities are not getting the same quality of care as the majority group, access to healthcare is not easily attained, and millions of minorities are uninsured. Kant asserted that moral rules are absolute and apply to all people, for all times, and in all situations (Burkhardt & Nathaniel, 2014, p. 44-45). The ACA is creating the opportunity for all Americans to receive health insurance with fewer disparities in the quality of care. To find knowledge of the right course of action the categorical imperative can be followed. The categorical imperative states, “act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law (Burkhardt & Nathaniel, 2014).” Meaning, if an action is morally right, it can reasonably be imagined to be a strict law. Unequal treatment regarding others is morally wrong. Every American should get the same opportunities and have the resources to allow for those opportunities. Every American should have access to healthcare and health insurance. The ACA is creating opportunities for Americans to achieve access.

Virtue ethics acknowledges compassion, truthfulness, and courage. It also describes the avoidance of selfishness and sets forth that if a person does “good” then the person will receive a “good life” in return (Plato). On the other hand, deontological theory acknowledges the actions and the results (Kant). In this essay I will be comparing these two theories to decide which of them was used to resolve an ethical predicament that I had to face.

You are certainly correct that deontology would produce a different ruling on this case. In brief, deontology focuses on the duty of individuals (Summers, 2014). Summers (2014) noted that this duty isn’t always the most significant increase of good for a person (p. 5). I cannot agree with you more that the court did not uphold its duty to Nancy Cruzan. This ruling of the court was clearly based in teleological theory, or considering a decision based on the consequences that would result (Summers, 2014).

Deontological ethical, according to deontologists certain actions are right or wrong in themselves and so there are absolute ethical standards that must be supported. The problems with this position are concerned with how we know which acts are wrong and how we distinguish between a wrong act and an omission. Philosophers such as Nagel argue that there is a fundamental concept of right which makes our actions, while this might be dominated in certain circumstances. There may be an absolute

The term “Deontological” derives from the Greek word “deon” which means obligation or duty, it’s primary focus is based on rules. The Deontological moral theory is considered a Non-Consequentialist moral theory, it asserts that the nature of an action is not simply dependent on expanding the good if the action did go against it, it is considered to be moral. The deontological ethics are what one talks about when it refers to principles, which teaches that some acts are deemed right or wrong because of the sorts of things. One has a moral obligation to act accordingly, despite of the bad or good outcome that will be produced. One that follows the deontological ethics should do the right thing even if the out turn is harm. One’s main duty is to do right if the outcome is a negative result.

After careful consideration, I disagree with the proposal; one being there are laws I must abide to as a health professional and secondly, the right thing to do is tell the patient and gain consent; therefore, I will be discussing deontology theory and virtue ethics.

Deontological Ethics are based on normative ethics position that judges the morality of an action that in line with rules. In other words, deontology falls within the nomenclature of moral theories that guide and assess our choices of what we ought to do (deontic theories), in contrast to (aretaic [virtue] theories) that—fundamentally, at least—guide and assess what kind of person (in terms of character traits) we are and should be.

From the moment we are born, our parents make sure to teach us the right from wrong. As we grow older we begin having our own thoughts and learning the ethical and unethical things of life. In today’s society, we are all expected to be more open-minded and respecting of others way of life and culture. That’s what being a Global Citizen is about. Through Global Ethics we have learned so far, that we can all relate to three important moral theories. These theories are known as Consequentialist (Utilitarian), Deontological, and Virtue. Through this paper I will also be discussing a case study found in chapter two, based on the Selling of Human Body Parts, and how it’s seen through the lenses of Cosmopolitanism and its four criterions, as

?Leadership can be described as a process of social influence which has the tendency of maximizing the efforts of other people with an aim of achieving a goal. As a leader, I subscribe to authentic leadership. Authentic leadership is an idea that has been around since ancient times and refers to a style of leadership that is very consistent with the personality of the leader and their core values, these values include; honesty, being ethical and practical in all dealings (Fidler, 2013). Authentic leaders put more emphasis on building their legitimacy. This can only be possible if the leader presents honest relationships, coupled with ethical actions. The leader will be able to positively influence others in achieving the goals

The three that resonate most with me is Normative, Utilitarian, and Deontological ethics. Ethical theories aid in explaining why and in what way we make ethical decisions. I find that in my case, it would depend on the particular situation to what ethical theory I would chose. For example, Normative ethics is based on how others may judge me, so for example if I decided not to attend church on a Sunday my family would not pleased, so based on the normative theory I may decide to attend to conform to my family attending church on Sundays. Utilitarian ethics is another one that resonates with me. I believe that sometimes one must make decisions based on the good of most. An example would be withholding upsetting information, because knowing to

Kant’s theory of deontology and Mill’s theory of utilitarianism provide starkly different approaches to assigning moral value to ethical dilemmas, two modern dilemmas being commercial surrogacy and physician-assisted suicide. This essay will expound upon the process of deciding moral value within each ethical theory and then apply this decision process to the two ethical dilemmas. Arguments will be posited in support or in opposition to the proposed ethical dilemmas according to the ethical theories. The discussion will revolve around the theories as proposed by the specific authors mentioned above in their relevant works.

In their personal and professional lives, people can and, unfortunately, sometimes do go against their moral and ethical standards. Ethical standards are what it means to be a good person, the social rules that govern our behavior. Ethics in business is essentially the study of what constitutes the right and wrong or the good or bad behavior in the workplace environment. A business is an organization whose objective is to provide goods or services for profit. The organization has a group of people that work together to achieve a common purpose. The moral challenges that these men and women face each day along with a whole range of problems that could occur, are why ethics plays such an important

The theoretical consideration on ethics in business focuses on the ecological as well as social responsibilities of a company within a community as ethics are regarded an important aspect in the external self-presentation and the perception of the organization in economic terms (Köster, 2002). The relationship between human resource management and ethics has been