Deontological and Teleological Ethical Theory

Is slavery evil, or should it be supported, the way it was practiced by the South in the 1850s? Was it the problem of the North, or the savior of the South? It depends how it’s looked at. And this will tell you that slavery is evil. Why? Slavery is wrong lawfully. It is wrong morally. And to the owners and slaves, it changes them. Basically, if slavery messes around with the system and the people in it, it isn’t a good thing.

Kantianism: In my opinion Immanuel Kant is the quintessential deontological philosopher. Those following Kantianism ask two questions before acting.

There are similarities and differences in deontological and teleological ethical systems. Each of the ethical systems will be discussed in a compare and contrast so that they are made clear to what they mean. There are seven major ethical systems that are either deontological systems or they are teleological systems.

On the other hand, rejecting the divine command theory, and accepting that moral principles exist independently of divine

Slavery is morally and ethically wrong because it allowed a person to control every aspect of another person’s life. Slaves from every culture were limited on basic rights and were always told what to do, never having a chance to live their life the way they wanted to. The most horrible aspect to slavery was the fact humans treated other human like they were not. In the document “ The Regimen on a Tobacco Plantation”, a slave Charles Ball explained how slavery devalued people as people by saying, “ [slave owners] used me worse than they had a moral right to do, regarding me merely as an article of property, and not entitled to any rights as a man, political or civil.” (Digital History). A human being’s rights, freedoms, morals, opportunities,

This ethical theory is mostly associated with its progenitor, Immanuel Kant, although other forms of deontology exist such as moral absolutism, divine command theory and contemporary

In one word, “Freedom” which is the opposite of slavery is the reason why slavery is so wrong. Slavery is another person physically and mentally owning you. Even, one do not have the right in his/her own body. Slavery, means you are not free even if you 're well fed, if your health is taken care of by your owner, even if your freedom is guaranteed. One’s existence as a slave involves being forced to perform services for someone, if you are obliged to others even if you do not want to give your consent, you then are enslaved.

First of all, we will discuss the origin end evolution of Divine Command Theory. There are three central assumptions about the correlation between morality and religion. We may focus on one out of those three assumptions. This assumption points out that somehow there is a direct relation between a divine being and what is morally appropriate. Russ Shafer-Landua explains this argument by claiming: “Morality must be created by someone, and God is by far the best candidate.” (2014 The Fundaments of Ethics p.63) God’s omniscience (all-knowing) is which gives the best credentials for designing a moral code. Also, this assumption claims that without the existence of God there would be a lack of morality, considering that we need some authority to guide us. Our disapproval of certains action do not make things wrong, since as human beings, we have a limited overall vision. Shafer-Landua also shows that due

The only reason slavery is wrong is that it is cruel, and makes men cruel and leaves them cruel.

Promoting gender equality and empowering women and girls is a priority for the United States. Women’s equality has came a long ways. Women used to have it very hard historically, but even today women still experience some inequality towards men. In this paper it will examine the equalities in: voting, the workplace, and sexual harassment. This paper will also so how the ethical theories of Deontology and Utilitarianism plays a part and how the ethical perspective Emotivism also plays a part.

Deontology is morals of obligation where the ethical quality of an activity relies upon the idea of the activity, i.e., hurt is unacceptable regardless of its results (McKenna, 2014). This idea was presented by a philosopher, Immanuel Kant and subsequently broadly alluded as Kantian deontology. The choice of deontology might be proper for an individual, however, do not really create a decent result for the general public (McKenna, 2014). The specialist understanding connection or relationship is by nature, deontology rehearse is broken, the setting of restorative carelessness emerges. This convention drives clinicians to do great to patients, reinforcing the doctor-patient bond. The ethical theory of deontology "does not look primarily at consequences of actions, but examines a situation for the essential moral worth of the intention of the act, or wrongness of the act." This theory of duty-based ethics would apply to the issue of restrictive restraint since ethically, the action of when to use or not to use restraint is dependent on the nurse's intent as opposed to the consequence (McKenna, 2014). Morally, limiting a client's freedom of movement cannot be commonly applied, so minimizing this occurrence and

Deontology based ethics relies on acts themselves, rather than the consequence of the act, to determine the morality of a situation. The ethics of deontology places special emphasis on the relationship between duty and the morality of human actions. Under this form of ethical behaviour, one cannot justify the morality of an action by showing that the result or consequence was good. Deontological ethics makes it imperative that a person fulfil’s his or her duty to act accordingly, despite a bed result. The two deontology based principles, the ‘Hypothetical Imperative’ and the ‘Categorical Imperative’, are described by deontology’s most influential philosopher, Immanuel Kant.

Kant believed in three things to test the moral worth of an action;

Deontological moral systems are usually primarily by a focus upon adherence to independent moral rules or duties. In order to make the correct decisions, we just have to know and understand what a moral way to think or act, and what is the right way to act and respect the rules that exist which regulate those duties. When we follow our way of living, then we are behaving morally. When we fail to follow our duty, we are behaving immorally.

Is it right for our society to be held for immoral behavior when it is already being displayed in our society and within the cultural areas in our lives? Right or wrong ways are always among our society, and when we are dealing with an ethical theory deontology system seems more established. This ethics theory, conducts a matter of right and wrong. This indicates our behavior, whether it is morally or immoral and which deals with human relationships to see how we comprehend towards others and how they comprehend toward us. Human activities normally depict one’s ethical nature, adhering to the moral values of the deontology theory. John Stuart Mill, states “that each individual got benefit only from the nobleness of others, with his own nobleness serving to reduce his own happiness.”(Mill, J. S. 2008) We have happiness and unhappiness that are developed as a consequence of an action; normally people judge their actions solely whether if it is considered right or wrong by virtue of their consequences and what matters in life. With this I do agree that people should be liable for their immoral act. In this essay I will explain the core principle of deontology theory, and the principle that supports the question that were purposed and express an objective on the basis of that argument.

The Divine Command Theory is one on the world renowned theories that assists me in making ethical decisions. In an article written by Michael W. Austin, he states that