Deontology Theory : Ethics And Moral Reasoning

The Deontology theory is one that I find quite interesting. I had never heard of it before I read the book. This philosophy describes a rational being and what it entails. As nurses we feel a sense of duty to our patients and this philosophy divulges into how duties and laws are set in stone and cannot be changed. We will always feel a certain duty to patients that will never waiver. There are two different duties that Immanuel Kant, the most influential philosopher with deontology, brought up, and they are the hypothetical imperative and the categorical imperative. The hypothetical imperative is an optional duty that is suggested so that an outcome can be achieved. (Butts & Rich, 2016) The example that the book gives for this is “If I want to become a nurse, then I have to study during school more” (Butts & Rich, 2016, p. 21), and I think this is an incredible example. The optional part of this is the studying. Obviously, if someone does

“Deontology is a moral theory that emphasizes one’s duty to do a particular action just because the action, itself, is inherently right and not through any other sorts of calculations – such as the consequences of the action” (Boylan, 2009, p. 171). In many aspects deontology is contrasted with utilitarianism. Deontology is based upon principle and does not calculate the consequences (Boylan, 2009, p. 171). Deontology attracts those seeking a stronger moral attraction because it refers to commanding rather than commending and commanding is a stronger structure (Boylan, 2009, p. 172). The

We might want to trust that everybody is thought to be equivalents, paying little heed to sexual orientation. Both guys and females have properties that are vital commitments to our every day lives and to our general public or any general public. Men and ladies both assume parts in the public eye and inside the home, yet these parts are thought to be altogether different. Men ladies still are not generally considered as equivalents, even nowadays. Despite the fact that sex balance has made considerable progress in the previous couple of decades, regardless we have a mountain to move to accomplish uniformity and stop sexual orientation predisposition

This essay will include the background and development of deontological and teleological ethics. Also, it will compare and contrast the absolute and relative ethics. Finally, it will contain the ethical issues which can affect the operational activities of the business. In order to support the points, it will also include the real life examples.

Ethics and virtue have been a very contentious issue facing society for centuries. Many argue over the merits of various theories, each with its own philosophies and assumptions. It is this argument that has given rise to many popular and followed theories of ethics and virtues. The theories discussed primarily in this document include the virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological theory. Each is very distinct to the others in regards to its principles and assumptions regarding human behavior. Each however, has merit in regards to question of ethics and virtue, and how it should subsequently be valued.

In order to make an artificial intelligence (A.I) program the most human, it must include deontology in its framework, because the robot would have a clear sense of right and wrong, its actions would have both positive and negative effects, and it would emphasize its value as a human being. Deontology based ethics are “concerned with what people do, not with the consequences of their actions” (BBC Deontology). Because the A.I would have a strict moral code, it would not stall in the limbo of “it depends”. Deontology provides certainty, so the A.I would always know what is a morally right action and what is not. This could yield positive and negative effects because some people would agree with the A.I’s reasoning when it came to making a decision,

Ethics is a study dealing with standards that prescribe rules on what people ought to do based on various criteria such as obligation, human rights, and virtue. More precisely, it is a development and establishment of one’s moral principle. And under the normative ethics, there are three categories of ethical frameworks: virtue ethics, consequentialism, and deontology. In this essay, I will more concentrate on consequentialism, especially utilitarianism, and deontology to make compare and contrast analysis of each other and how each case works differently and causes divergent result in the same scenario.

There are three main philosophies that can be used as ethical processing when determining whether or not to carry out an action: utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. Each philosophy has its own set of pros and cons that set them apart from the others. Overall, utilitarianism is the most secure philosophy to use in your personal, everyday life. Utilitarianism deserves the most emphasis because it is situational, broad yet certain, and it incorporates parts of both deontology and virtue ethics.

In South Park, South Park illustrates normative ethics in society and people. The characters and scenarios are well scripted to categorize the three main theories of normative ethics; utilitarianism, deontology and virtue ethics. The show constantly displays the universal mindsets of multiple people within various situations and how one effects the other and the world. Majority of these scenarios, virtue ethics brings about the best results for those within the South Park community and the main characters. In the following, I will argue why virtue ethics is the most effective theory to always follow of all theories and how always following a utilitarianism and deontology approach can cause conflict within oneself and society.

I have chosen to apply deontology to my cause because I am advocating against the morally wrong action of discrimination against visually impaired persons during hiring. The deontology approach focuses on the rightness or wrongness of an action based on its adherence to a universal law. There is a duty of organizations, and in this case, companies to act in fair and impartial ways and ways that benefit the society. Society includes the visually impaired as well as the able-bodied. Thus, according to its duty, companies should hire employees in a way that ensures that all members of the society have an equal chance at securing a job according to their abilities and aptitude. With appropriate tools, the disabled can be as competent as the able-bodied.

The opponents argued that the deontology framework was unacceptable. It created impractical standard which cannot be used in catastrophic circumstances. The scholars who disregard the tortured justification on deontological frameworks argued that torture may be justified under certain circumstances from consequential grounds. Bufacchi and Arrigo (2006) believed that if it is the lesser of two evils and is better to avoid the great one. The ticking bomb scenario was acknowledged to describe the situation in which using torture so as to gain the information about the location of the ticking bomb from the terrorist. In examining, using torture can be regarded as the lesser evil so as then to prevent the greater evil. To develop this argument,

Kant’s theory of deontology and Mill’s theory of utilitarianism provide starkly different approaches to assigning moral value to ethical dilemmas, two modern dilemmas being commercial surrogacy and physician-assisted suicide. This essay will expound upon the process of deciding moral value within each ethical theory and then apply this decision process to the two ethical dilemmas. Arguments will be posited in support or in opposition to the proposed ethical dilemmas according to the ethical theories. The discussion will revolve around the theories as proposed by the specific authors mentioned above in their relevant works.

Describe the main principles of the two normative ethical theories of deontology and utilitarianism. Compare and contrast the two theories, bringing out any problems or limitations you see in each.

I have reason to believe that treating others with respect, integrity, trustworthiness and justice is important to living my moral lifestyle. Many virtues such as honor and respect were taught to me through my parents about biblical and virtuous lessons. The reason why I moral is to reap the benefits from being virtuous. Indeed, people are not born with the moral instincts, these are to be learned through discussion, research and personal experience. Although my motivation for this is technically not the same as classical theories my theory however is permissible to deontology. Deontology is the study of morals based on reasoning. Youths do not know right from wrong or if virtues are necessary. Therefore, Moral development in human beings

Ethics, also known as moral philosophy, is a subject of philosophy that engages itself in systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong. It investigates questions of right and wrong and of the best way of living for people. In this essay I am going to explain the differences between the ethical schools of consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics and argue that in my opinion deontology is the most reasonable theory of the three.