Department Order 914 Case Study

After the Japanese attack on the American naval base at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. USA enters a war against the Japanese and President Roosevelt declared the 19 February 1942 Executive Order 9066 . The executive order 9066 consisted of transportation and introduction to anyone who was Japanese or Japanese descendent consentracion camps. Many of the transladados were Japanese and American resulado was forcing more than 100,000 people to leave their homes and belongings to be imprisoned only because of their race. The justification of the American govierno for aprensar and detain suspected Japanese Americans since the govierno believed they could have helpers or spy in the attack on Pearl Harbor. The camps were closed until after the reelection

The Petitioners, officials of the State of North Carolina, are askeding for the decision of that case to be overruled. They argued that “if inmate communications on legal problems are not restricted, there is no further obligation to expend state funds to implement affirmatively the right of access.” The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

This appeal involves a dispute regarding the interpretation of overtime pay provisions outlined in the Howard County General Pay Plan (“HCGPP”). Appellant, Lynda Neser (“Neser”) contends that she was deprived of compensation to which she was entitled under certain provisions of the HCGPP. Neser filed a grievance with the Howard County Personnel Office. A personnel officer denied Neser’s grievance. Neser then appealed the personnel officer’s decision to the appellees, the Howard County Personnel Board (“the Board”). The Board adopted the findings of the personnel officer and affirmed the denial of Neser’s grievance. Neser then filed a petition for judicial review in the Circuit Court for Howard County. The circuit court affirmed the

During the Second World War the Americans held 120,000 Japanese Americans in camps that was isolated, uncomfortable, and overcrowded. Even if their families were treated this way 33,000 Japanese Americans still served in the military. The Americans would see their Japanese neighbors as aliens and untrustworthy, however the Journalist would have false reports about them, which then made the suspense against the Japanese Americans bigger. Executive Order 9066 was signed on February 12, 1942 by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and had 120,000 of his American soldiers go to the detention camps until the war was over. A few weeks after, there wasn’t any trials, so they had to force the Japanese Americans to go to the camps and had to abandon their

In your grievance filed at Buckley Unit, you claim you requested an Inmate Wells 187589 be added to your Do Not House With list and COIII Jones refused your request. Your resolution is to have your disciplinary ticket removed from your record and transfer you to Rast Unit.

The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to honorable or general, under honorable conditions and a change of reentry code. The applicant contends that she was having family problems and the chain of command granted her emergency leave to return home and rectify the situation. The applicant states, in effect, she was pending separation in accordance with AR 635-200, Chapter 6 (hardship discharge) due to a lack of a family care plan. The applicant contents that upon her arrival at Fort Hood, Texas, she retrieved her children, follows the orders given to her by the chain of command. The applicant further states, that she maintain communication with her new chain of command in Korea and until

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden's response is affirmed. The Arizona Department of Corrections has entered into a contract with Century Link to provide telephone service for inmates and their families. The Century Link Company is complying with the terms of their contractual obligation with ADC. ADC inmates are not authorized to have internet access. Therefore, your proposed resolution is denied.

In your grievance filed at Red Rock, you claim staff confiscated photos from your incoming mail. You further assert, Department Order 914 does not prohibit photos of the female anatomy from a medical perspective. Your resolution is to receive and possess the photos.

The Court has issued a Show Cause giving the Department 21 days to respond to complaints raised in correspondence from James E. Houck, # 421-024. He raises several complaints; however, the Court’s Order directs that the Department presently only address Mr. Houck’s claim that “he is in danger from known enemies and an inmate was placed in his cell by a correctional guard to kill him.” The Court has directed that the response include declarations and verified records. See p. 4 of Order.

In your grievance filed at Central Unit, you claim COIII Forman refused to provide you staff assistance to help you gather evidence for your pending disciplinary hearing. You are requesting that COIII Forman receive sanctions and retraining on being a Disciplinary Coordinator.

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Bureau Administrator's response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 903 INMATE WORK ACTIVITES

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden’s response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 905 INMATE TRUST ACCOUNT/MONEY SYSTEM

Again, it would appear from the plan language of the complaint, that Petitioner’s issue b is that the District failed to

What are “Form 941” taxes and why is Stan classified as a monthly depositor of Form 941 taxes?

How mail is processed is up to the discretion of the institution. Outgoing mail is the property of the institution until it is handed over to the Postal Service. Until it is accepted by a Postal Service employee, or deposited in a Postal Service mail receptacle, correspondence is no different than any other inmate property. Correctional facilities are well within their authority to open, examine, and censor inmates outgoing correspondence and packages. Most facilities have a system to allow privacy for special mail, such as legal correspondence, communications with members of Congress, courts, and other similar circumstances. But these policies do not preclude screening inmate mail for dangerous materials.