preview

Descartes 'First Meditation'

Decent Essays
Open Document

In the First Meditation, Descartes introduces the idea that everything must be placed in doubt. He argues that everything he had known to be true came to him from the senses or through the senses. However, the senses must be doubted for at any moment, he could be dreaming or his senses could be deceived either by God or some malicious demon.
Descartes starts off by acknowledging that everything he had once accepted as true, had come from his senses. However, his senses have deceived him, so it is important that everything he has known must be doubted. By doubting, it will enable us to discover what will be the truth. He then goes on to acknowledge that there are some things which he cannot doubt, like the fact that he is sitting in front …show more content…

Thus, he establishes the premise that there are no certain indicators which enable one to differentiate between being awake and being asleep.
He supports this by suggesting that the images that are seen in dreams are representations of real, existing things. He provides an example of painters. He states that when painters create what looks like something completely new, it is actually not something new. Instead, the painters are taking two different things that already exist and combining them together. Descartes further proves this premise by accepting that it may be possible for a painter to create something new, however, the painter would have to use colours that already exist so that certain part will still be real.
Descartes continues his argument by providing the premise that certain more complex disciplines, such as physics, astronomy, and medicine can be doubted but more simple disciplines, such as arithmetic and geometry cannot be doubted, for whether he is awake or asleep two plus three will always equals …show more content…

Thus, he will work on doubting everything so he does not continue to be led into falsehood.
Descartes premises are open to criticism. Firstly, Descartes claims that everything he had believed to be true came from his senses, but since his senses have deceived him, it cannot be trusted at all. However, Descartes does not take into account that without trusting his senses, he will not be able to seek what the real truth is. Since he claims that everything comes from the senses, this must mean that real truths along with falsehoods must come from it.
Secondly, Descartes argument that we are unable to differentiate between being awake and being asleep is unconvincing. In reality, there are factors that occur in the ‘dream’ world that would just not be possible in the ‘awake’ world. For example, while dreaming, I am provided with super natural powers that I do not have while awake. Descartes leaves this particular argument open to criticism for he does not cover all grounds of

Get Access