Describe The Three Theories Of Ethical Violations In Corrections

In the United States there are four main goals when it comes to punishment which are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation (DeJong, 2016, p. 288). The main goals for these punishments are to maintain order over society and to prevent recidivism (DeJong, 2016, p. 288). This ties into the Ecology perspective. By maintaining order over society and preventing recidivism, it ties into all of the issues regarding the Ecology perspective which requires for each issue to address the individual, family, community and society. Maintaining order over society and preventing recidivism strives toward making a safer environment for the individual, family, community and society. There is no universal agreement for making the severity of punishment just or fair (DeJong, 2016, p. 288). When it comes to retribution the person who is getting punished deserves the punishment (DeJong, 2016, p. 289). Retribution refers to when an individual commits a certain crime then that person must receive a punishment proportionate to that crime or suffering that they may have caused towards the victim (DeJong, 2016, p. 289). Regarding deterrence there are two types, general deterrence and specific deterrence (DeJong, 2016, p. 289). General deterrence focuses on the society in general and wants to scare everyone away from committing crimes (DeJong, 2016, p. 289). Specific deterrence focuses on criminals that have already been convicted and wants to prevent them from

Now, in order to truly look at the topic at hand, I feel that it is necessary to examine a few different viewpoints when it comes to this ethical issue. These viewpoints are called deontological, and utilitarianism. Each approach provides a unique look in the idea of capital punishment and will help to look at the consequences at the present time, as well as in the future. The question of whether it is ethically acceptable to take the life of someone is at the heart

Bentham, J. (1789). Punishment and deterrence. In A. von Hirsch & A. Ashworth (Eds., 1998), Principled sentencing: readings on theory and policy (2nd ed.). 53-57. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

PLEASE NOTE: Philosophical theories of punishment, such as deterrence (based on the ethical theory of utilitarianism), retributivism (based on the ethical theory of deontology), denunciation, and restorative justice are covered comprehensively in a different course, PHL 449, Philosophy of Punishment.

The goal of general deterrence is a punishment that sets an example for other would-be criminals. Punishment must be tough enough to dissuade others from committing similar crimes. Incapacitation places offenders behind bars and removes the opportunity for continued criminal activity. Specific deterrence seeks to impose consequences that outweigh the profits if criminal activity. The goal of retribution is that the seriousness of the punishment is equal to the seriousness of the crime. This is referred to as just desert. Rehabilitation focuses on treatment programs and helping individuals with underlying problems that may have motivated them to commit crime. It assumes once the underlying issues are resolved the individuals will no longer be

The Eighth Amendment states that the execution must be constitutional and not a savage punishment. There are times when the punishment will not occur successful and a painless death is not guaranteed (Schmalleger, 2015).

When it comes to The Constitutional Amendments there is a lot of opinions. Most of the time the Amendments are argued is when the government is trying to change them, and when americans are fighting for our rights. The eighth amendment states “ Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed , nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” This amendment for most people would include the death penalty. The death penalty is a very controversial topic so I will state my opinion in the next couple paragraphs.

The ethical dilemmas that law enforcement professional face on a daily basis are vast, the ethical dilemmas that correctional officers face are unique and in today’s environment, extremely persuasive. The ethical dilemmas’ that affect correctional officers include theft, contraband into the facility, and misuse of authority to include sexual misconduct (Brasswell, McCarthy, and McCarthy, 2015). One wonders, how does an ethically responsible individual come to the crossroad of ethical impropriety? Can these ethically corrupt actions ever be defined as good; does this misconduct hold a positive place in our correctional system? A utilitarian view of misconduct and more specifically sexual misconduct would look at the overall good that is created

Sorry for the late response Dr. Brightman. However, there are several different punishment philosophies that are used throughout the world. One form of punishment is retribution where the offender is required to pay back society for the crime he or she had committed. Another form of punishment is rehabilitation where the offender is put through a program, such as a medical, psychological or educational one, to transform the offender into a law-abiding person. Also used is deterrence where the offender should come to the conclusion that the crime is not worth the risk of the resulting punishment. Also incapacitation is used where the offender is denied the opportunity to commit further crimes, usually through prison or exile. And of course

Because this method can rise up the jail population, it should only be used when a criminal is outrageously violent (This would mainly define people who commit heinous crimes such as aggravated assault and manslaughter). By taking outrageously violent offenders off the streets, the society will be a much safer place to live since the fear of encountering the violent. The fourth and final way that the criminal justice system can reduce crimes rates is through the use of retribution. This is form of punishing criminals involves the use of “just desserts” which means that the amount of punishment administered to the offender is guided by proportionality, with minor crimes receiving more lenient punishments and more serious crimes receiving harsher punishments (“Definition of Retribution in Criminal Justice” n.d.). An example of this type of punishment would be having a criminal be put to death for killing a victim. This type of justice can be related to the saying “an eye for an eye” since the criminal is receiving a punishment proportionate to the unlawful act that they committed (“Definition Of

The first philosophical underpinning I will introduce is Retribution. This process of punishment is derived from the famous “eye for an eye” mentality. Retribution focuses on proportionality and punishes offenders based on the severity of their crimes. Therefore, a person who has committed murder will receive a longer sentence that someone who was brought in for shoplifting according to the principles of retribution.

A second approach focuses on issuing punishment to, or obtaining retribution from, those who have committed serious crimes.

Ethics determine what is considered decent and acceptable behavior in society and it is a key aspect of life, whether it is at work, home, or in society. As bizarre as it seems, some things may not be illegal, but can be extremely unethical. Yet in the same sense what is unethical varies by the person. The purpose of this paper is to expound the differences between the three main ethical theories in criminal justice. While elaborating on how an agency can be improved when applying the correct theory to the problem.

There are many controversial points of view on the death penalty in America’s society. Is the death penalty socially correct? Is it just? The death penalty is an execution sentence that a person convicted of a capital crime must face. A person can only be sentenced to death in 33 states (deathpenatly.org). There have been as of April 1, 2012, 3,170 death row inmates in the Unites States history, with an exception of the two inmates in New Mexico and eleven in Connecticut that remain on the death row due to the law not being made retrospective to these inmates. The controversy whether the death penalty is just or unjust has been a debate in America for many years. There have

There are five goals of punishment per our justice system, reason being is for every action calls for a reaction. Whenever a person commits a crime or react to a thought process there is consequences that needs to be put into play. discipline is any adjustment in a human or creature's surroundings that happens after a given conduct or reaction which lessens the probability of that conduct happening again later. These punishments are: Retribution which is punishment inflicted on a person who has harmed others and so deserves to be penalized. Anyone who feels they need to infringe on the rights of others and does not deserve to suffer the consequences does not have a fear of the amount of punishment they shall receive. The reason for retribution