Description Of A Letter On A Client

Can plaintiff Ron Arnett state a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) under Pennsylvania law given that Arnett was located twenty feet from the accident that injured Sarah Nolan, saw Ricky Landis running toward the pool and realized immediately after the impact what had happened, but viewed the impact while underwater; and though they share an emotional bond, Arnett and Nolan are not biologically or legally related?

This claim arises out of a lawsuit filed by Plaintiff, Debra Nathan-Nenn, on her own behalf, and on behalf of her minor son, Grey Hoffman. The Amended Complaint alleges in general that Ms. Nathan-Nenn executed a written lease to rent a house from the insureds starting on June 1, 2013. The plaintiffs further allege that starting on the day the plaintiffs took possession of the house, the drain in the kitchen sink was not working and the insureds failed to correct this condition. The complaint continues to allege additional deficiencies in the rental property such as mold growth in one of the bedrooms and in various locations of the house due to excess moisture and failure to patch exterior openings, insufficient heating, holes in the exterior walls, an unfinished deck, insufficient weather sealants, vermin in the crawlspace, frozen pipes and lack of running water. The plaintiffs further allege that the insureds have failed to address and resolve the above issues. The most serious claim is that the mold present throughout the house caused the plaintiff and her minor son to become ill.

I arrived on scene and met with the landlord, Michael T. Bryant (M/W, DOB: 09/25/1990), while Deputy Vaughn met with the tenant. Bryant was having an issue with a tenant who agreed to stay at a rental apartment until the unit he was going to rent to them was cleaned and ready to rent. The alleged tentative agreement between the tenant and Bryant was for 15 days in the temporary apartment. Bryant stated when the original rental property was ready to rent, the tenants did not like it and stayed in the temporary apartment. Bryant had a problem with that because the temporary apartment the tenant was living in was already to rent someone else.

The letter informed Complainant that his rent was being readjusted to $100 per month effective November 2017. Respondents state that they did not receive this letter until around mid-December 2017. Subsequently, Respondents adjusted Complainant’s rent to reflect new monthly charge of $100. However, Respondents assert since November 2017, Complainant has failed to make any rent payment of $100 even after the rent adjustment. Respondents maintain that Complainant’s failure to make his November rent payment which led to the issuing of the eviction notice. Respondents maintain that Complainant’s source of income had absolutely nothing to do with the decision to issue the eviction

I responded to Trojan Commons Apartment B1 in reference to a damage to property call. Upon arrival, I made contact with Courtney Doolittle. Doolittle stated that when she arrived at her residence this afternoon, she noticed the door had shoe prints on it. When Doolittle opened the door, I observed the foot prints located on the door and structure of the door had been damaged, as someone tried to gain entry. Myself and Doolittle walked through the apartment to see if anything was missing. Doolittle stated that nothing was missing at this time. I advised Doolittle if she noticed anything missing, to call Troy Police Department. Doolittle stated that this damaged had to be done between Thanksgiving Day and today, before she arrived to the

The dishes in the kitchen sink where stacked nearly a foot tall. The kitchen counters had miscellaneous tools, junk and trash stacked all over it to where there was not any visible counter space. There were piles of laundry approximately two feet tall and three feet in diameter, clean and dirty, in the kitchen and the laundry room but I was unable to differentiate between the two. The kitchen and dining floor, which was white tile, was mostly black with what appeared to be and smelled like animal feces but the Dunn’s stated this was mud from the driveway. I advised the Dunn’s that they should clean the residence and that I would follow up in a couple of days. The Dunn’s assured me the residence would be cleaned in a day. I

Police involvement was necessary since security was unable to assist that night; security services are complementary since the guard must service all three of Ms. Miner’s complexes, thus encouraging the use of police with emergency situations. Ms. Miner was uneasy when she learned about the assault and personally emailed the Plaintiff to inquire about her condition and to clarify that damages to the unit be repaired. Yet, Plaintiff responded by placing the blame on her ex-boyfriend for the damage, claiming that he wasn’t a guest (Exhibit 7); nonetheless, Plaintiff reluctantly paid $2500 for repair costs

Carr was to file a complaint with either council or the Court of Queen’s Bench. The first advisement would be to search all municipal and enforcement records to investigate if Mr. Carr had ever been issued a written order for clean-up, staff documentation regarding the unsightly premise and create a list of all formal complaints regarding his unsightly property. If a past written document for removal had been issued and not followed through with, then Small Town may be able to avoid legal repercussions by verifying that this was follow up with the non-compliance order. As this is unlikely to be the case based on given information, the next recommended step would be for Small Town to issue an acknowledgement of error to Mr.Carr. This brief acknowledgement would apologize for removing his abandoned Carr’s without formal written notice and advisement that all costs of the removal would be covered by Small Town. To ensure that the document would not create additional legal loop holes in the case that Mr. Carr proceeds with litigation, the document should be created or advised by a legal expert prior to being sent to Mr.

Continue by furnishing facts like date of the lease agreement and address of the property in 1.1. Enter the name of the tenant and the name of the landlord in the spaces provided in subsection 1.2. Describe the property in detail in 1.3.

(4th Amend. Compl. ¶¶ 17-19.) Further, according to Plaintiffs, the property’s water supply came from a well, which was not safe for drinking. (4th Amend. Compl. ¶¶ 20-22.) Also that month, Nenn allegedly informed Defendants that a “large hole on the side of the house near the bathroom . . . remained open and in disrepair,” which left the “insulation totally exposed to the elements,” certain windows were missing trim and weather sealing, and that “another large hole existed near Nenn’s bedroom that allowed the exterior elements to penetrate” the property. (4th Amend. Compl. ¶¶ 23-28.) Plaintiffs allege that Defendants failed to make the repairs within sixty days. (4th Amend. Compl. ¶¶ 26, 28,

Miner agreed to rent unit #3 to Plaintiff, a former tenant of Portola complex. Plaintiff worked as a waitress at Danny’s restaurant and resided in unit #3 for one year before her lease expired on December 31, 2016. Although Plaintiff regularly paid rent in a timely fashion, during her tenancy however, multiple noise complaints and damage sustained to the unit has subsequently lead to her renew lease denial on December 2, 2016. Moreover, Plaintiff never repaired the garbage disposal in her unit in accordance with her leasing agreement.

The apartment building is located on 357 Lake Hill Drive, California. The complainants are the five other families that are living in the building.

While walking through the residence I noticed a large amount of trash throughout the residence along with animal feces on the floor and in the bath tub. See attached images.

The reporting party (RP) stated there is a resident named Dale who is very difficult to engage. The RP stated Dale has "called him out" to fight. The RP stated he felt threatened by the resident and called the police. According to the RP the police told the administrator/owner Beverly Juniel to give the RP an eviction notice. The RP stated Dale steals personal property from residents and has defecated in the yard. According to the RP Dale does not want to be in the facility but does not control his money. The RP stated Dale's sister control his money and refuses to move him. Because Dale's sister does not buy him cigarettes he steals them from residents including the RP. The RP stated he walked away from his cigarettes and lighter for a few

I would like to inform you that I have received the confirmation from Jeremy Dittmer that they can help us with the sexual harassment and unlawful discrimination in the workplace.