Descriptive Language In Lord Of The Flies

In addition to his actions, Simon’s encounter with evil further characterizes him as a Christ figure and an oracle archetype. The novel’s title, Lord of the Flies, originates from a mistranslation of Beelzebub, another name for the devil. The sacrificed sow head on a spear, called the Lord of the Flies, symbolizes the devil. Since Simon’s confrontation with the Lord of the Flies occurs in the midst of a delusion, it can be considered a prophecy similar to an oracle’s vision. Both Christ and Simon meet with the devil while in altered physical states. Simon’s confrontation with the Lord of the Flies is a result of severe dehydration and an epileptic fit indicated by “a pulse [that] began to beat on the brain” which parallels Christ’s meeting with the devil during the forty days he went into the wilderness without food or drink (Golding 138). In his vision, Simon realizes that “things are what they are” because

“They were black and iridescent green and without number; and in front of Simon, the Lord of the Flies hung on his stick and grinned. At last Simon gave up and looked back; saw the white teeth and dim eyes, the blood—and his gaze was held by that ancient, inescapable recognition” (Golding 138). Once an offering to the “beast”, the pig’s head swarming with flies that had been severed by Jack and placed on a stick, manifests into the Lord of the Flies, representing pure evil. Simon, embodying the goodness of man and peace stumbles upon the head. The interaction between Simon and the Lord of the Flies is almost an interpretation between good and evil. The strong symbolism in this book gives a deeper meaning and a definite truth

The encounter with the Lord of the Flies supports Simon’s thoughts that the beast that the boys are hunting for is not an actual animal. The Lord of the Flies tries to persuade Simon to let go of his rational thoughts and be taken over by his primal instincts in order to have fun like the other boys. However, when Simon’s silence declares that he refuses to let go of logic and rationality, the Lord of the Flies realizes that Simon knows what the beast really is—the innermost part of the boys. Simon seems to make this connection that the Lord of the Flies is representational to the inner beast within the boys almost instantly. “His gaze was held by that ancient, inescapable recognition”(Golding 139). Simon instantly The Lord of the Flies quickly makes the connection, too. “You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you? Close, close, close! I’m the reason why it’s no go? Why things are what they are?” (Golding, 1 ). The Lord of the Flies is symbolic to all the evil that is in humans. As Simon realizes that he was right about the beast, he tries to go back to the other boys to warn them about his discovery, but the Lord of the Flies gets angry. “This is ridiculous. You know perfectly well you’ll only meet me down there—so don’t try to

In Lord of the Flies, William Golding uses figurative language in the beginning and end of chapter 3 to illustrate the difference in personalities between Simon and Jack, which is shown through the description of the forest through their perceptions. To keep order on the island all the boys have specific jobs to do. Jack was assigned to be a hunter and Simon was helping Ralph with building shelters. While in the forest, Jack is searching for pigs to kill. While he was searching for the pigs, he was on the ground sniffing for any traces of animals near by “Then dog-like, uncomfortably on all fours yet unheeding his discomfort, he stole forward five yards and stopped” (Golding 48). The language presented demonstrates Jack and how he is losing civilization and beginning to turn

Both of the boys change a lot during their stay on the island. Ralph begins the novel as a leader and role model to the other boys. But eventually, the group gives in to savage instincts and Ralph's position

Both of the boys change a lot during their stay on the island. Ralph begins the novel as a leader and role model to the other boys. But eventually, the group gives in to savage instincts and Ralph's position

From the perspective it is written in, the reader can only see something as how it is written. The first example is when Piggy died. "Piggy fell forty feet and landed on this back across a square", because Roger had pushed a giant rock on top of him (201). From this, the reader can see that Roger had killed Piggy. But from the third person perspective, the reader will never know if it was intentional. From the perspective it is written from, the reader will never know if Jack and Roger planned this death because from reading the novel, the reader would be able to tell that Jack and Piggy have this hatred that started in the beginning of the novel. The communication between Jack and Ralph is never shown throughout the book. The second example is when they decide that they should create a fire. Jack and the boys ran up the mountain to create a fire. The boys never made the huts like how they were supposed to instead, they went “howling and screaming up this here mountain”(45). From the way the story is written, it shows that Jack was only into the idea of a fire, not a signal fire. This is a problem because, Jack decides to make the signal fire and not tend to it. He did not communicate this to Ralph or any of the other boys, so the signal fire went out. The last example is when all the boys were at the assembly and they were discussing the beast and what the littluns saw. They were

In the novel "Lord of the Flies" careful attention is payed to the way the in depth descriptions of the island was used to create imagery and pursuade the readers response. For example on page 14/15, there is much emphasis on the brightness and colour of the island. This influences the reader to think that the island is like a

In chapter 4, Golding uses words that are very descriptive but at the same time, he uses words that are restless and scary. For example, "the sun gazed down like an angry eye" (Golding 82). This shows that the sun was angry at them. Golding also uses a peaceful description, but it also has a restless undertone. For example, "snapping sharks; floods of light; odd succession of mirrors" (Golding 81). These words make the peaceful description strange and unpleasing. But overall, I liked the way Golding wrote this chapter because it is quite descriptive and understandable.

Figurative language is a main component in showcasing the emotions the characters reveal. An example being when the author writes “ The children huddled up to her and breathed like little calves waiting at the bars in the twilight.” This portrays the children's emotions with more emphasis and really shows how they watched everything Granny Weatherall did with precision. This type of writing really helps the reader understand what is going on within the characters and their actions. The author also displays figurative language in the way she describes how John would be in the situation of them still being together. She describes him as being more of a child, rather than taking a parent role.

Throughout this magnificent novel, William Golding collaborated civilization with good and savagery with evil. The English boys were civilized, humane, and educated as they slowly acclimatized themselves to a vulgar, primitive, and swinish life in the jungle. The rivalry between civilization and savagery is represented between the two main characters Ralph and Jack: Ralph represents tranquility and leadership, while Jack represents boorish and lust for power.

Strong diction in writing can help the reader receive a better understanding of anything the author is trying to portray. In the novel, Lord of the Flies written by William Golding diction is used throughout the book to help create an ominous setting. Words such as lagoon, creepers, witch-like cry, and flashed are strong choices of diction which helped Golding create an ominous setting.

Man has been evolving through time ever since he began to exist, he starts out as a savage animal in the wild, and since evolves to the civilized person we know today. What would happen though, if man had to go back to the wild? Would they go back to their savage ways? This is shown in the book, Lord of the Flies by William Golding, when a group of young boys find themselves stranded on a deserted island. The theme of this book is loss of civilization takes men back to the savage that they have evolved from, and literary devices illustrating the theme are tone, diction and allusion.

One of the characters that are introduced as a stereotype is ‘the fair boy’.The stereotype used to present Ralph is a cool boy who is only friends With other popular boys as he didn't care about the other boy from the beginning as he said “wait a minute” this show that he doesn't care about anything apart of leaving and finding his way out. This character is really important to the novel as it says ‘the’ in front of ‘fair boy’. He is one of the popular boys who has a high status as it says ‘piggy looks up at Ralph’. This shows piggy admires Ralph as Ralph is more popular and the cool boy. As Ralph has a high status piggy looks up to him. This also shows piggy has a lower status than Ralph. “The fair boy” can also show the description of him the “fair”could also be referring to his hair colour and the readers were told that in the first paragraph shows his one of the most important characters. Golding also introduces as to another character “other boy” and ‘fat boy’ he is not popular as he has a low status. Before in the novel Golding calls him “the other boy” clearly from the beginning we are shown that he is not important as we are not even told about any description about him. He is also shown as a really clever child who wears ‘specs’. In society people who

William Golding, the author of Lord of the Flies, includes many metaphors, often incredibly dark ones, in his writing. In Lord of the Flies he has some very important metaphors about human nature. He shows this very strongly with many characters. Specifically, Jack, Piggy, and Simon; the human representations of savagery, reason, and human goodness. The book is named because of a pig that gets killed and gets its head put on a stick. The pig head attracts flies, hence the name, Lord of the Flies. Throughout the book there are many symbols but, I believe the pig to be the strongest symbol that truly shows the depths of human nature through the traits of many characters in the book according to their personal relationship to the pig. The pig shows, in more ways than one, how there is a beast inside of all of us, it just takes longer for some to let it out.