Desiderius Erasmus - "prince Of The Humanists" Essay

The renaissance of the twelfth century was a revival of cultural and intellectual activity from 1050 to 1250. Guibert of Nogent’s autobiography, A Monk’s Confession: The Memoirs of Guibert of Nogent, and the prologue of Peter Abelard’s Sic et Non (“Yes and No”) are both products of this time period, having been written in 1115 and 1122, respectively. While Abelard’s text primarily focuses on applying reason to religious matters—a very renaissance thing to do—Guibert sheds light on a greater variety of affairs. Both documents indicate the strong faith that one would expect to find in people during this era of religious enthusiasm. Together, the documents paint an informative picture of the intellectual activity and culture of their times.

To begin, the past experiences of Erasmus and Luther affected their approach to reformation. Desiderius Erasmus was born in 1466 and died in 1536.

European literature of the late fifteenth century and early sixteenth century was a time marked by increased individualism and an inclination to remove all of the remnants of medieval society. It was a time of protest and reform of the ideals, that were once thought to be correct, to more modern ideas, such as free will and that the self-made individual occupies the center of a rational universe. As this new concept of individualism began to spread, there were apparent discrepancies between the noble ideals presented by the modern renaissance humanists and the reality of human behavior. The discrepancies are shown clearly by the Pico’s “Oration on the Dignity of Man” and Erasmus’ “Praise of Folly.” In the text by Pico, he describes the ideal characteristics of this new renaissance humanist movement emphasizing the individual. While in the text by Erasmus, he shows the shocking reality between human fallibility and human perfectibility.

The Renaissance describes the period of European history from the 14th century to the late 16th century. During this time The Renaissance was only seen as a form of rebirth, it wasn’t until later in time where people viewed the period differently. Some say it was one of the greatest ages of human cultural achievement. Jules Michelet and Jakob Burckhardt, for example, view the period as being characterized by the rise of an individual, scientific inquiry, and geographical exploration, and the growth of secular values (La Renaissance). “Nicola “said that he had personally broken some tablets that had been placed as a decoration in a church not far from Porcia, declaring it was wrong, and that they did not belong there and were...merchandise...and that figures should not be placed in church.”” (The Cheese and the Worms, Page 20) The Renaissance gave birth to many artistic views and skills. Much of the art involved religion in which Ginzburg points out that no one is supposed to worship any images of God. This points to one thing that Menocchio learned from

In William Manchester’s “ A World Lit Only by Fire: The Medieval Mind and the Renaissance: Portrait of an Age” He demonstrates the change in the "Dark Ages" from the dependence on religion to independent thinking. Ancient concepts were questioned and proven wrong after thousands of years, and the power of the what finally surpassed the authority of the Pope. Manchester expresses the transition within Europe from the Medieval Times to the Renaissance that included multiple changes in the intellectual, religious, and political aspects of life.

In thousands of years of history, people’s view of man changes overtime. One part, in particular, the time of the Renaissance changed man’s view of man. The Renaissance was a time of prosperity which started from 14th to the 17th century. The Renaissance first started in Italy and later spread to Europe over three hundred year course. During 1350 to 1650, the Renaissance changes Italians and Europeans’ view of man from studying previous works of the Greeks and the Romans. The Renaissance changed man’s view of man by astronomy, anatomy, and culture.

The Middle Ages lasted from 500 CE to the early 1300’s. It was a time of poverty, disease, and religion. After the Middle Ages ended, Europe was during a time period called the Renaissance. The Renaissance lasted from 1300-1700. People in the Renaissance had a limited education, but as it grew, it introduced a movement called humanism (Background Essay). Humanism praised the beauty and intelligence of an individual (Background Essay). The Renaissance ended up being a time of evolution and these two time periods changed the world for the better. The purpose of this essay is to explain how the Renaissance changed man’s view of the world.

In the 16th Century, Europeans had their faith shattered and were forced to realize that there was doubt in what they believed in. From the countless wars being fought in the name of religion, to the once great and wealthy countries that needed to reaffirm their place in the world, ‘all that they had once taken for granted was suddenly cast into doubt’ (446). Europeans were desperately searching for new foundations to put their faith in ‘in the face of intellectual, religious, and political challenges’ (446). This period is an example of the expression “Age of Doubt, Age of Uncertainty”.

“Desiderius Eramus of the Netherlands was the most prominent of the Christian humanist” (“Humanism” 1). Eramus was famous and known as the prince of Humanist. He wrote the New Testament in both Greek editions and Latin editions (“Renaissance Humanism”3). “Eramus became famous all over Europe, living mostly in Holland, England, and Italy. While being compassionate to Martin Luther’s criticism of the Catholic Church, Eramus never forsaken Catholicism (“Renaissance Humanism”3). “Eramus refused the educational methods of the University of Paris as well as worked for the enhancement of modern-day civilization by means of criticizing the troubles of the day judged next to Christian knowledge” (“Humanism” 1). Eramus was born in Rotterdam Netherlands, in 1466. At nine years old he went to school at Deventar ran by a humanist named Hegius. Eramus went there and studied theology. Eramus first major was called “Enchiridian Militis Christian”, which came out in 1502. This book was about true religion and piety, while throwing some criticism at the church. To pursue his studies, Eramus was spurred by poverty to enter a monastic order in 1486 (Melton 1). Eramus tried to fight for his rights with the churches. Ermaus argued for reformation, that wouldn’t bother the leader of the church. He disagreed with Luther’s excommunication, but Eramus

During the Renaissance of the sixteenth century, Europe experienced a golden age of new works of art, literature, and advancement in medicine. However, as these advancements spread across the European nation-states, the order of the Protestant Reformation began to rise. Christian humanists and middle-class patrons opposed the religious mores, creating unorthodox standpoints of the European Christendom. Likewise, in Erasmus' The Praise of Folly, the allegorical figure, Dame Folly, criticizes the follies of influential groups and individuals of the sixteenth century. Rather than creating a written work that agrees with the conventional views and methods of the period, Erasmus takes a modern approach instead. Erasmus uses a peculiar technique

Erasmus’s Praise of Folly is a humor-filled satire of pretty much everything. It is filled with wit and sarcasm which make light of serious problems and blow insignificant issues out of proportion all the while bringing a smile to the reader’s face. It is not stinging humor at the expense of others (unless, of course, the shoe fits), rather it is directed towards everyone. Erasmus even includes himself in the joke, practically parodying himself in the first section (xvi). In Praise of Folly, Erasmus uses this humor to criticize without the harsh judgment of seriousness. His humor parallels the import of his subject. When Folly discusses the

The Renaissance, a revival of antiquity starting in Italy around the middle of the 14th century, had broad implications for the way western society would operate thereafter. It would no longer focus on the church and its dictates, although they would still play a part. It would no longer have its government seated in Rome, with small pawns of the church controlling the land, although the church would still have a hand in government. It would no longer shun the vast stores of knowledge created in the past and ignored for a thousand years, although opponents would remain. The ideas of humanism, individualism, and secularism would come to play a role in society as they had in the past. Niccolo Machiavelli lived in a time when the

For centuries, people looked to religion for the answers to their greatest questions. The Church had a firm grip of how people viewed the world. God's will was to be followed without question and any attempt to explain a phenomenon without God's involvement was heresy. When the Renaissance began to spread across Europe, the qualities of humanism became more prominent. Scientific and rational analysis was becoming of great interest compared to supernatural explanations. Renaissance world-view can be characterized by a growing humanistic orientation that can be demonstrated by analyzing cultural artifacts from the era.

At the turn of the 16th century, the Italian Peninsula was marred in brutal conflicts. Nations across Europe, such as France, Spain and the Holy Roman Empire constantly raged wars to keep each other out of the numerous territories around Italy. During this tumultuous time period, a man named Niccolo Machiavelli studied in Florence and witnessed firsthand the issues that rulers often faced while attempting to conquer these Italian cities. His experiences prompted him to write a literary work on his opinion of the ruling class, and his philosophy on how rulers should rule over their subjects. However, his novel The Prince, is an interesting outlier of the time, as parts of it contradict the popular social view of Humanism, which focused on the

Erasmus believes in the need of a universal language, both in verse and prose. He was well versed in Latin and in Greek. Erasmus and Thomas More were both staunch Catholics, opposed the reformation  as proposed by Martin Luther but thought the church needed 'adjustments'.  Erasmus differed from some of More's ideas, for instance he believed in free will of the individual,  whereas More did not. They all advocated social reform and were interested in improvement for society. Erasmus thought science unworthy of a gentleman. "Erasmus appeared as a responsible and constructive critic of society. He attacked the superstition and formalism of late medieval religion, offering in their place a simple piety that could appeal to all levels of society."(Wilcox)