Design And Develop The Hip Prosthesis With Cementless Fixation For Specific Breeds Of Dogs

must look into the past to see where the problems started and how they have evolved.

2010. Association between radiographic assessment of hip status and subsequent incidence of veterinary care and mortality related to hip dysplasia in insured Swedish dogs. Preventive Veterinary Medicine; 93(2/3):222-232.

Hip dysplasia can happen in any dog, animal, or human. It is caused by their genetics traits. Even if both of parents don’t have the disease , it can still happen in any dog or animal. If ether parent of the dog has hip dysplasia, then the dog’s offspring are at greater risk for developing it. If neither parent has hip dysplasia, then it is very unlikely that they will get the disease. If there are gene carriers it, then they can get the disease. You can greatly reduce the incidence of hip dysplasia through selective breeding and carefulness.

In this essay, I will introduce what I did in this semester of this course, and also will outline what I learnt from this course and in the process of the design and prototype making. Meanwhile, I will reflect what I would to do if I met the iteration of design and prototyping for the same problem space. And in the last part of this essay, a reflection analysis of the project, which related to the theoretical context provided by the lecture material and self-directed research will be provided in this essay.

After passing through these stages, an agreement is made before continuing to the design stage. Here all inputs/outputs, hardware/software for the new systems is designed. The creation and editing of the interfaces, codes and reports are worked.

What are the key issues (sub-problems) that need to be analyzed in order to solve the main problem?

This action requires the analyst to have an understanding of the components involved and the process being investigated. By considering, then discarding or retaining scenarios that may have caused the situation, the analyst will be able to narrow the scope of the investigation until the source of the problem has been uncovered.

We will be approaching this case by first analyzing situation broadly and then narrowing down our focus right to the problem and conclusion stage

This phase requires all the experts on the team to brainstorm and identify risks. If phase I isn’t done well, the rest of the process will suffer.

Introduction: (provides the big pictures and context), problem description, analysis and study, results, summary and future work (more of engineering), appendices and references.

Identifying and analyzing the problem. According to Brest & Krieger (2010), the first step in rational decision-making is identifying and defining the core problem facing the business. All related information to the identified problem needs to be gathered and then critically analyzed in order to determine all faucets of the problem (Brest & Krieger, 2010). This process will help the individual identify and separate the symptoms of the underlying problem from the root cause of the problem (Brest & Krieger, 2010). The individual should also determine whether the problem is controllable. Once the root cause of the problem has been identified, the individual can then apply logical reasoning to begin analyzing the problem in further detail (Brest & Krieger, 2010). A detail analysis is necessary to determine the severity and level of

Review the context of the research problem- One must think carefully and focus on the teamwork. This helps the researcher to determine the findings of their project and it will produce enough information to be worth the cost. One has to identify the environmental variables through which it will affect the research project.

apply these principles. The example considers the inputs of a design engineer and the inputs of the

What are the key issues (sub-problems) that need to be analyzed in order to solve the main problem?

Conceptual is more concerned with long-term results, brainstorming of alternatives, creative approaches to problem solving and taking higher risks. No idea was eliminate and the team sure to choose a higher risk plan, which could result in economic extra for the company. The team made conceptual sketch of the pack burning breaker coaster and the make stronger mass slide.