The authors clearly stated that the design of their research used a cross-sectional design.. It would have been beneficial if the authors’ could have noted that the design was a non-experimental and time related.
Population and Sample The population targeted used an eligibility criteria which consisted of post CAD patients between 60 and 85 years of age. The paper lacked reporting the accessible population through geographical location. Thus it was not clearly stated where the participants were recruited from and how they were contacted to participate within the study. Confounding variables such as socio-economic status, other chronic illness diagnoses and education levels were not addressed in the sampling section. The sample technique used was noted by the author as a convenience method. Although this is the most common and economical type sampling it does come with flaws such as atypical population and the risk of bias (Loiselle, Profetto-McGrafth, Polit, and Beck, 2011). Although the author noted that this was a sampling by convenience the subjects need to be an eligible to meet the criteria and sub group categories. Therefore, this most likely was done with a quota sampling method (type of non-probability sampling). The sample group consisted of both genders and were between the ages of 60 to 85 years of age and fit all criteria to be in the study. The study was divided into three categories (Acute, Rehab and Maintain). The participants were either going to enter a
Longitudinal design is one of many studies that researches utilize to study human’s behaviors. In these types of studies the individuals are left alone without any type of contact with the researchers. The reason for
The researchers used purposive sample but did not give any explanation as to why this choice sampling was made. It is essential to describe the sampling process in a research where this facilitates the reader to distinguish any bias in the whole sampling process. In studies using participants, the process of how to select, access, inform and retain research participants requires considerable thought. Sampling is a key issue, because it is
For the purpose of this study, the researcher intends to use a cross-sectional research design where all the data will be collected at the same time. The distribution of the research questionnaires will take place over a time period of two weeks where the main data will be collected from the respondents.
Researchers or research teams who elect a quantitative study are going to determine the relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable within a population (Babbie, E.R., 2010). There are two types of quantitative study designs: descriptive and experimental. A descriptive design typically measures the subject once and establishes the association between the independent and dependent variables (Mujis, D, 2010). An experimental design measures the subject before and after a treatment and establishes causality between the variables (Brians, C.L. et al, 2011).
A single-subject design of research was utilized. This research design is a prevailing and practical tool that is applicable for assessing interventions with the participant seeking specific habitual behavioral changes under a given set of circumstances (monitoring SSB intake). The design involves a AB structure, where “A” is the baseline (regular daily SSB consumption) phase and “B” refers to intervention phase (limiting SSB intake). Outcome was recorded during both phases, which made it easier to understand because it showed (intake) what happened on a day-to-day basis. Baseline data will be collected daily at the home (setting) of the participant for one week and entered into a questionnaire and chart at the end of the week. The following week the participant did the same thing, but only this time SSB intake was monitored daily to see if limits could be put on consumption, the behavior the participant wanted to change.
The criteria I used to determine the study design is looking at what kind of study the research is. In descriptive and correlational studies, there are no treatments involved (Burns & Grove, 2011). Since this study has treatments involve and the researchers have control over the treatments, it is experimental. Experimental study also uses a smaller sample size like the sample size in the article. It also involves 3 characteristics namely: (1)
Barratt, H., Kirwan, M. (2009) Design, Application, Strengths & Weaknesses of Cross-Sectional Studies [Online]. Available from: http://www.healthknowledge.org.uk
groups. 24 of the elderly patients studied met the requirements of having some form of
did not reveal the sampling technique used. It is assumed that a consecutive sampling technique was used to select the sample group of patients that met the study’s eligibility criteria, including the inclusion and exclusion criterion. Tests such as the mini-mental state examination were performed to control confounding variables. Descriptors were utilized including medical condition, location, and enrollment in a diabetes and hypertension monitoring system of the population. Machado et al. did fail to list the number and characteristics of potential participants who declined to participate in the study but did account for this occurrence with a 10% increase to the sample calculation for losses and refusals (2017).
In the modern age of health,education and public safety, society relies on rigorous research methods to find answers to complex issues dealing with social issues and general concerns. Ultimately, some short-term research methods may initially fail; however, continued extended research should surely result in success and benefit future generations. Depending on the topic of research; some research methods might be more appropriate than others. For example, clinical and laboratory experimental trials might receive better consummation if they use Quasi-experimental and Classical Experimental design rather than Cross Sectional Studies and Longitudinal Studies which focuses more on psychological experiments and behavior studies (Addison) (2015).
Furthermore, on to the text, would provide how studies can be tested/experienced to get the given information one is seeking for. Study designs, are procedures on how an individual would engage to gather their data. There are two types of design studies, one is the cross-sectional approach and a longitudinal study approach. The cross sectional approach is a study based on observations representing a single point in time. In comparison, with a longitudinal approach would be a study design that involves in collecting data at different points in time.
Burns and Grove (2009) describe sampling as “a process of selecting subjects, events, behavior, or elements for participation in a study”. In this study, the researchers obtained a sample of the population to be studied by using the self-selection method. The participants were selected from a specific geographic area and adults affected by DMT 2 in ambulatory care setting agreed to be a part of the study after a door to door calling was conducted to identify the subjects. Creatinine level was
Sample (sampling techniques, sample size, sample characteristics) Two authors independently reviewed the references to identify studies for inclusion and extracted data to assessed risk of bias in all included studies.
e. I did not recognize any potential bias introduced by the sampling method used. The researcher states the eligible requirements to participate in the study and the results reveal the significance of the use the patients and the effectiveness.
A study design is the procedure that guides a researcher on how to collect, analyze and interpret observations. It is a logical model that guides the investigator while he navigates through the various stages of the research. Study types can be classified severally depending on the research strategy employed. A study type can be non-interventional that is ‘observational’ where a researcher just observes and analyses researchable objects or situations without intervening. Non-interventional study designs can be exploratory, descriptive or comparative. A study can also be