Designer Babies Research Paper

A good thing of having a designer baby is that the baby won’t have any problems it will live happy that it is immune to dangerous diseases. Designer babies can be the future of humanity they can be smarter, more fit and healthy it can help society in a good way. Either way instead of designer baby’s there is gene modification.

Let me start by saying that the equipment has yet to be found a hundred percent safe for the embryo or the mother making the chances of a negative outcome a higher stake than it would initially be. Moreover, since the technology is fairly new it creates several unknown possibilities that researchers are unaware of. One of those big issues is being that when genetically modifying the embryo it may affect the gene pool which can cause difficulties later on throughout the family's genetic makeup. Also a huge problem through the lens of health is the fact that parents may use genetic modification for their superficial purposes, such as seeking out a blonde haired, grey eyed baby for appearance concerns rather than health concerns. Which can cause some health issues for the embryo if the parent becomes overly obsessed with the baby key features and not solely on the baby's health concerns. This key concept is a huge con when the topic of genetic modification of human embryos comes to the

The contemplation of designing your very own baby by picking and choosing specific traits may seem very intriguing, and most beneficial or exciting as a parent. Although as a repercussion of it can cause harm towards the parents themselves and the child. However, genetically modifying babies can result in benefits if used properly, but negative effects come along with the process of it all that can result from it. Genetically

The possibility of making a designer baby could be happening soon. It is no longer an issue of whether it will happen; the question is when will it happen. Today researchers are making fast advances in information on the human genome and how to change and adjust genes. Utilizing pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), parents can choose particular developing embryos to guarantee a specific sex or to prevent a disease. Nevertheless, this innovation may be utilized to choose eye color or even the intelligence of a child. People should not be allowed to design their babies because it is not morally correct, it could create discrimination against the disabled, and it could affect the child 's mental well-being.

(Thadani 2). The process of “Designer babies” involves fertilizing the egg by the sperm in a test tube outside the mother’s womb, and altering the genes. This procedure is also called Pre- implantation Genetic Diagnosis, known as (PGD). It is noble to eradicate disorders and diseases. Some people use the process for non- health reasons. When the screening is opened up to non-related health, 72 percent disapprove of the procedure, (“Introduction to Designer Babies: At Issue.”). According to a June 2006 paper published by Kathy L. Hudson of the Genetics and Public Policy Center, many people wanted to enforce a line between acceptable and unacceptable uses for PGD. (Hudson 1). By 2009, the Fertility Institutes in Los Angeles were letting parents select their children’s hair and eye color. The procedure brought over 4 billion dollars a year to the clinics. Clinics were focused on the money and no the important things, like the patients. They did not have the best interest in their patients, as much as they did in the money. (“Introduction to Designer Babies: At Issue.”). The public had a very negative view about using PGD for personal traits. (“Introduction to Designer Babies: At Issue.”). The clinic changed their policy after the outbreak of the public. (“Introduction to Designer Babies: At Issue.”). Also the procedure is very risky. The procedure involves some risks to the embryo, and some parents with no personal history of disease or disability. (Briggs 2). If the process is not done correctly and carefully, the embryo may have a chance of being terminated. (The Ethics of “Designer Babies”). The procedure also causes a chance of mutation. (“Preface to ‘Genetic of Enhancement of Human Abilities’”.). The technology

First of all, the technical definition for a designer baby is a baby whose genetic makeup has been artificially selected by genetic engineering. This is combined with in virtro fertilization which is fertilization of an egg outside the womb to eliminate genetic disorders and diseases (Thadani 1). Even though this seem a noble purpose, there is a chance that scientist will abuse this procedure. Genetically engineering the child will not only eliminate disorders and disease, but give parents the ability to choose attributes for the child. Using this method, parents will most likely start designing babies to favor the way of life that the parents want. For instance, the parents might want the child to be intelligent, so they enhance this attribute but when the child grows up he or she might want to be an athlete. Altering the gene for intelligence might affect the outcome of whether he or she will have any

I think we should have designer babies because what if someone can’t have kids and they want a baby? What do they do adopted or just make a designer baby, just think about it would you want you child to have something wrong with them. So now with designer babies, your baby won’t have anything wrong with it that you don’t want. According to The Ethics of Editing Human Embryos “Imagine if genetic diseases could be removed from the very biological code of our species — a future in which the likes of hemophilia, cystic fibrosis or dozens of other afflictions are simply edited out of human embryos. In April online in the journal Protein and Cell, a team of Chinese scientists reported the first documented experiment to do just that.”

This will increase the segregation between the richer and poorer parts of society. Also this could create prejudice and discrimination between the “Designer” and “Non-designer” children, with “classes” created between them. The non-designer babies could miss out on opportunities, such as jobs because people are more likely to take the “optimum” candidate for something. The use of designer babies could also create a gap in society, as there will be a loss of individuality and diversity. This is because parents will choose the prime characteristics such as intelligence or athleticism resulting in everyone being relatively similar. The means the ability to “change” and evolve as humans will falter. Who would want a world with everyone the same? It is also concerned that these techniques will be developed with innocent intention, for example repairing a faulty gene, but will be marketed to people or abused by the government and turned more into a business rather than a medical

Are designer babies good or bad? There are many arguments that come up when this topic is mentioned. The ethical dilemma of inheritable genetic modification, which is the changing of genes that are passed on to future generations, is humans shouldn’t play God. The production of designer babies is morally wrong. But then again they could help a family and human being from suffering. An advantage of creating designer babies is that they could remove a disease from a family’s genetics. That was one of the goals of the Human Genome project. Scientists wanted to map out the entire DNA of a human. Similar to what we have now in our government

In Mary Shelley’s, Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein becomes fascinated with the secret of life and sets out to discover what life truly is. Thinking he discovered the secret to life, Victor successfully creates a living creature out of old body parts. Unfortunately, the creature becomes dangerous and goes on to murder Victor’s family and friends. Though Frankenstein is fictional, with modern technologies, the creation of designer babies is an increasing reality. Designer babies are genetically engineered in vitro for specially selected traits, which can vary from lowered disease risk to gender selection (“Ethics of Designer Babies” 1). With the possibility of designer babies becoming a reality, many ethical arguments have come into play. Within these arguments the pros and cons of designer babies are discussed and many ethical issues are brought up.

Over the course of human existence, we have been able to design and devise revolutionary technology to suit human needs and desires. But with the advancement in technology came a whole new world to discover with more complications and problems. Humans are so keen to learn and discover that somewhere in between we have forgotten about what the consequences of that could be. That’s exactly the issue with designer babies. We are venturing into uncharted territory of human genes with advanced technology, who knows that the world is capable of doing. Brain Hayes, a senior writer for American scientist supports my reason and states “This runs many risks. It's used in many countries to avoid the birth of female children” Each year there are thousands of sex selective abortions because some cultures find sons more suitable than daughters for religions and economic demands. According to ‘population research institute’ based on the natural ration of boys to girls which is 105 boys for every 100 girls born there should only have been 47 million boys born than girls in the past 15 years but because of sex-selective abortions there were approximately 71 million more boys than girls born, meaning a huge 24 million sex-selective abortions occurred, which is absolutely ABSURD. Before finishing Hayes also includes “This designing aspect would also lead to an objectification of children as commodities” Think about it do YOU really want YOUR children/s to be identified as merchandise… or just another “product”? If the misuse of technology doesn’t change your perspective on designer babies may be the next reason

However, the concept of designer babies is still relatively new; thus, it raise concerns about the safety of this technique. Also, the process of designer babies has only been experimented on rabbits and rats, so it has yet to be tested on humans. Therefore, there could be hidden risks and side effects for humans that have yet to be discovered until after the procedure is completed. The issue of competence emerges because “patients must understand the treatment involved and the potential side effects, as well as the probability of possible outcomes” (Morrison and Furlong, 2014, p. 262). The editing of the genome is still a mystery as there could be unexplored territories. There could be the possibility of cleaving the wrong genes and as a result serious side effects may occur when necessary genes are sliced. In addition, unpredictable consequences may occur in future generations, so prospective problems may not always appear until the birth of the baby (Pang and Ho, 2016). Thus, it raises the risk of the emergence of new types of diseases or disabilities if genes are edited. It will be difficult to tell when problems arise during the process and it may eventually show up only once the irreversible procedure is completed. Furthermore, “the success rate of impregnation is lower than most would like, harvesting eggs from the woman—a procedure not without burdens—may have to be done multiple times” (Suter, 2007, p. 930). Women will have to undergo the risk of implantation even though it is not guaranteed that she will become pregnant as a result. The cost of this procedure is quite significant, but there is still a chance that the process may not work or is ineffective. Therefore, it is not possible to know the potential risks until it emerges, so it questions the safety of designer babies because there is still more to learn about the technique since it is still

And if this is successful it can lead to a better understanding of genetics which can lead to a better understanding of more positive things to improve on the human life. Another good think about designer babies is that it can reduce risks of diseases which can prevent future deaths caused by diseases, And with that it can also reduce inherited medical conditions for example obesity, and cancer. And most of all it is not mandatory meaning if you do not wish to have your baby enhanced, in any way you don’t have to.

The remarkable advancements in technology and the exceptional discoveries in science has brought this generation one step closer to unlocking the secret to the modification of embryos to our own wishes. Designer babies allow society to customize offspring that hold certain, desirable traits through the process of genetic engineering during in vitro fertilization. Although scientists have possibly found a way to genetically modify the genes of a human embryo, it has become clear to me that I disagree with the process of engineering a child as people will use it only for appearances, be misused that’ll lead to a form of abortion, and create a gap within society.

There has been a debate about whether to use genetic engineering to create “designer babies.” Some people believe that these could be used to rid the human species of genetic diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson's, and some kinds of cancer. Others believe that designer babies could lead to a new kind of classism. I believe that we should not use genetic engineering to create “designer babies” because Crispr, the method used for genetic engineering, has not yet been refined enough to be used safely in humans, and the babies being modified don’t have a say in the matter.