Designer Baby Research Paper

The rich have the financial capability to access designer babies’ services. They can choose the traits that they want the child to have. This also demonstrates the desire for perfectionism, and this is not compatible with being a good parent. An insistence of a parent to have a child of a certain sort be it an athlete, musician or politician amount to parental tyranny. These attempts can constraint the prospects of a child to flourish as the parents try to preferences and expectations on a child. Providing the child with the genes to be an athlete does not mean that the child will enjoy sports. The child may be having a talent that will make him useful to the entire globe, and this should be natured. Children should be appreciated as gifts and be accepted as they

Imagine a world where having a baby was like looking through a menu at some fancy restaurant. Imagine being able to choose how a baby will look and act. As mind-boggling as it sounds, scientists and researchers came across an unbelievable discovery: it is possible to design and edit a baby however a person may like. Hanson asserts that personality, gender, appearance, intelligence, hair color, and height can be changed using technology that was originally used for animals (Hanson). These babies are called designer babies. Phillip Ball, a science writer, claims that it is possible to change the genetic makeup of an unborn baby using bio-technology. However, these changes can have more negative effects than positive. Although most countries have not legislated the use of genetic modification, studies have been done on human embryos in China (Ball).

A designer baby is genetically engineered baby. In other words designer baby is an edited human examples are parents’ choice of eye color, skin color the child being smart or active. The first designer baby was created in the year 2000. A designer baby can also not contract diseases you can genetically make the baby be immune to a family disease or any certain diseases. What are the benefits of having a designer baby?

As we stand in the world today, we as humans have never been more technologically advanced or scientifically intelligent. We have the ability to explore outer space and the depths of the oceans. We are even in the process of developing organs using 3D printing technology. But there is a limit to the extent of advancements that humankind can reach before some begin to pose dangers to humanity or become unethical. Currently, technology is being developed to expand the procedure of in vitro fertilization to genetically modify embryos. The products of this engineering are commonly known as “designer babies”. This technology, when fully developed, would grant parents the opportunity to select against possibly life threatening or altering conditions such as cystic fibrosis, schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s. Using this technology, parents would also be able to make extensive selections regarding their baby’s gender, physical characteristics, and possibly even personality traits and talents. While it is positive advancement to be able to select against life-threatening diseases, the creation of an a-la-carte baby is unethical and crosses the line between positive sociological developments and immoral manipulations of nature for many reasons.

Though it is evident that the concept of “Designer Babies” would prove unpopular amongst the majority of society, there still remains to be advocates for a future compromising of GM children. It is argued that gene technology will bring about a new age of human beings who are happier, smarter and healthier. Supporters look forward to a future when parents could quite literally assemble their children from genes listed in a catalogue. A future in which the health, appearance, personality and life span of our children become mere artefacts of genetic modification.

The escalating supremacy and receptiveness of genetic technology to engineer and "design babies," now gives parents the option to modify their unborn children, consecutively to prevent their offspring's from receiving genetic disorders such as: "sickle cell diseases, cystic fibrosis and down syndrome ," or conceivably, make them blue eye coloured, intelligent or else blessed with enviable qualities. Would this mean there will be an increase in the superiority among the rich, both physically and mentally, or will this modification be available for all to exploit, or would we be evidencing engineered babies facing unexpected genetic predicament? The highly contentious issue of designing unborn children to be a perfect "epitome" is thoroughly investigated and examined in the article of, lead author of

Living in such a fast paced society people look at new technologies as almost being something that they are forced to try. Biological and technological advances become so over bearing that we almost can’t resist. Although Stephan L. Baird in his article Designer Babies: Eugenics Repackaged or Consumer Options? And Bonnie Steinbock in her article Designer Babies: Choosing Our Children’s Genes, take issue with “designer babies”. Baird believes that this technology has already enabled “designer babies” and now the concern should be over regulation. Steinbock, on the other hand, is both critical and dismissive of “designer babies” and doesn’t believe parents have

Day by day, an accretion of advancements and improvements are formed across the world. Prominent developments occur rapidly, like the use and creation of technology. Technology has and continues to create an immense effect on how we live our daily lives. Its use is ranged from how information is found, travel, communication, and more. However, the advancements of technology seems to interfere with the circle of natural life, life that is brought into our world. It has changed the lives of unborn children, whom are in the form of an embryo. Altered by a new technique and process of genetic modification, that is commonly referred to as “Designer Babies”. This genetic modification, genetically modifies the DNA of an embryo to achieve desirable traits amongst them. It changes an unborn babies development and future life. While it may seem that designer babies can be a positive life change, there are negative effects that outweigh, due to the fact that it goes against human nature; genetic probability, expectations, diversity, and religious prospects.

(Thadani 2). The process of “Designer babies” involves fertilizing the egg by the sperm in a test tube outside the mother’s womb, and altering the genes. This procedure is also called Pre- implantation Genetic Diagnosis, known as (PGD). It is noble to eradicate disorders and diseases. Some people use the process for non- health reasons. When the screening is opened up to non-related health, 72 percent disapprove of the procedure, (“Introduction to Designer Babies: At Issue.”). According to a June 2006 paper published by Kathy L. Hudson of the Genetics and Public Policy Center, many people wanted to enforce a line between acceptable and unacceptable uses for PGD. (Hudson 1). By 2009, the Fertility Institutes in Los Angeles were letting parents select their children’s hair and eye color. The procedure brought over 4 billion dollars a year to the clinics. Clinics were focused on the money and no the important things, like the patients. They did not have the best interest in their patients, as much as they did in the money. (“Introduction to Designer Babies: At Issue.”). The public had a very negative view about using PGD for personal traits. (“Introduction to Designer Babies: At Issue.”). The clinic changed their policy after the outbreak of the public. (“Introduction to Designer Babies: At Issue.”). Also the procedure is very risky. The procedure involves some risks to the embryo, and some parents with no personal history of disease or disability. (Briggs 2). If the process is not done correctly and carefully, the embryo may have a chance of being terminated. (The Ethics of “Designer Babies”). The procedure also causes a chance of mutation. (“Preface to ‘Genetic of Enhancement of Human Abilities’”.). The technology

I’m treated differently than everyone else because of my race. I don’t understand it, though, because I look exactly the same as my peers. They mock me and tell me I’m inadequate, fake, and alive only due to the organ crisis. I tell them I have no idea what they are talking about, because my doctors told me that I’m just like everyone else. They laugh in my face and spit on me, ruthless in their play. I run home to my living center and cry myself to sleep.

Technology has made leaps and bounds over the past several years; it has come to have tremendous effects on how we live our lives; from transportation to how quickly we can access information. Recently, technology has begun changing the lives of children, especially infants. A new form of genetic engineering can genetically modify the DNA of an embryo to achieve specific or desirable traits; this is referred to as “Designer Babies”. This procedure will ultimately change lives, for better or for worse. While it may seem to most that designer babies are beneficial, they will actually cause more harm than good.

Even though there are several advantages of designer babies, this technology also brings some negative consequences for humans at the same time. First of all, the safety concerns, much like we saw with early recombinant DNA research include both potential dangers to the offspring of patients treated and to the environment(Shapiro). As this technology has not developed completely, it may cause the termination of women’s embryos and damage gene pool(Designer babies). Second, for the moral concerns, children whose genes are modified may live in a priority group, which could create a social gap or inequality in society. Based on the differences in abilities and intelligence, opportunities will spread unevenly. Furthermore, designer babies may result in gender unbalance and increase gender inequality because some parents hold desires of having a child of a particular sex. According to some statistics, the male to female ratio is already nearly 1.2 in China and some parts of India. In 1990, there were 100 million women “missing” as a result of various forms of discrimination(Savulescu). Moreover, the creation of designer babies allow the gaps of economic status to increase. Since the process of designer babies requires developed

Foremost, the rich can get designer babies way easier than the lower classes are able to have, but at least we can have numerous experiments. For example, in the article,

This will increase the segregation between the richer and poorer parts of society. Also this could create prejudice and discrimination between the “Designer” and “Non-designer” children, with “classes” created between them. The non-designer babies could miss out on opportunities, such as jobs because people are more likely to take the “optimum” candidate for something. The use of designer babies could also create a gap in society, as there will be a loss of individuality and diversity. This is because parents will choose the prime characteristics such as intelligence or athleticism resulting in everyone being relatively similar. The means the ability to “change” and evolve as humans will falter. Who would want a world with everyone the same? It is also concerned that these techniques will be developed with innocent intention, for example repairing a faulty gene, but will be marketed to people or abused by the government and turned more into a business rather than a medical

The idea of designer babies has been present in science fiction literature and films for decades. From Huxley’s novel Brave New World, in which babies are grown in vats and there is no such thing as family, to the 1997 film Gattaca, in which children who are genetically engineered are considered superior and a person’s value is based entirely on their DNA (Molina, 2016).