Desperate Measures Research Paper

Public health researchers with the UC San Francisco group, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, conducted a longitudinal study of 956 women who sought an abortion and were turned away. Diana Foster’s study reveals what happened to the women’s economic standing, health and relationship status after being denied their right. She claims that, “When a woman is denied the abortion she wants, she is statistically more likely to wind up unemployed, on public assistance, and below the poverty line” (Newitz). This is clear because one of the major factors in a woman’s decision to abort, is because of her awareness that she will not be able to financially support her child. One of a woman’s most formidable fears is to fail to adequately raise her child and provide him with his greatest odds to succeed. Naturally, a mother’s ultimate goal is for her children to have a better life than she did. This fuels the majority of people’s ambition and determination to obtain a comfortable and promising life style, to then pass on to their offspring. Women living in poverty seek abortions because they do not want to bring a child in a life of misery and suffering. The decision to terminate a pregnancy is not just blindly decided, all aspects of the mother’s and child’s life are considered. In fact, after initially being denied the right to abort, the survey demonstrates that 45% of the women were on public assistance (Newitz). However, Foster concludes, “a year later, they were far more likely to be on public assistance — 76% of the turnaways were on the dole…67% percent of the turnaways were below the poverty line” (Newitz). Therefore, it is evident that not allowing women to legally have abortions creates more strain on the state because of these mothers' increased dependence on social assistance programs.

The case of A.C.L.U and Planned Parenthood v. Pence has brought attention to the Supreme Court with the question of which of the two is of greater importance: the duty to honor the woman’s autonomy versus the duty to respect potential life. Indiana’s governor, Mike Pence, has signed a House Enrolled Act No.1337 to amend the Indiana health code, which will go in effect on July 1 of 2016. The act affects abortions in several ways which include that doctors much provide perinatal hospice care information to women considering abortion after receiving a diagnosis of a lethal fetal anomaly, prohibits all abortions solely based on fetus’s race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, or diagnosis of the fetus having any disability, and lastly requires the women to take responsibility financially for the disposal of the remain of any abortion or miscarriage. After the act was signed into law, A.C.L.U of Indiana and Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky sued Governor Pence on the grounds that the law was unconstitutional. The A.C.L.U and Planned Parenthood won in the district court. The case was appealed to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals and was reversed. Today, the court responds to the petitioners’ appeal by holding that Indiana’s House Enrolled Act No.1337 is unconstitutional. This decision stems from the recognition that the law while attempting to do its duty

The court also recognized that the right to privacy is not absolute and that a state has valid interests in protecting maternal health and protecting potential life. A state is allow to ban abortion after viability, except when it is necessary to protect a woman’s life or health. The ability to make this personal health care decision has also enabled women to pursue educational and employment opportunities that were often denied before the Roe case, The Supreme Court noted that “the ability of women to participate equally in the economic and social life of the Nation has been facilitated by their ability to control their reproductive lives” (Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 1992). According to the Economist, "Roe v. Wade may have liberated many women; yet it has also trapped America in an irresolvable clash of absolutes. On April 18, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court gave politicians the permission to interfere in the private health care decisions of women and families by creating the first federal law banning abortion procedures. The federal government made a decision to ban and criminalizes abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy . This ban affects more than just the women who need second-trimester abortions due to the fact that the Court's decision dismissed more than 30 years of precedent that prioritize women’s health when it came to laws that cast restriction on abortions. In the states that have passed laws similar to this, many women and their families were put into agonizing and tragic situations; being unable to end a pregnancy for serious medical reasons (Federal and State Bans and Restrictions on Abortion). As Politicians across the country succeed in restricting access to abortion, women are facing the consequences. Laws that restrict access to abortion hurt women's

Abortion debates have been taking place for centuries, just like the debates and arguments supporting the women of America that have suffered to receive and maintain equal rights, and rights in general. The case between Plaintiff Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, “PPINK,” and Indiana is important to all American women, Planned Parenthood is a non-profit organization to provide healthcare and planning to women and families, this clinic also supports and provides surgical abortions. Indiana passed a law to change abortion regulations, this law sets back women who seek abortions and clinics

The topic I have chosen is Abortion Surveillance. The purpose of this report was to focus on women throughout the United States who have had legal abortion. According to the article and reported by the CDC a total of 664,435 abortions were documented in 2013. The data was reported from health organizations throughout 50 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City. The main population that was focused on all races, ethnicities, and economic standings of women between the ages of 15-44 years old. Which means during the 2013 the ratio of 12.5 abortions per 1,000 women or 200 abortions per 1,000 live births accrued. Positive note, the abortion rate did go done 5% from 2012 to 2013. The source of data for this article, which can be found on table 4-1 is Abortion Surveillance, Center of Disease Control and Prevention, Alan Guttmaker Institution, and Planned Parent Hood Federation of America.

Throughout many generations, American citizens have categorized themselves into two separate groups in relation to abortion, which has become a large complication in today’s society. Every day, protesters throughout the nation are either fighting for pro-life or pro-choice views on abortion. Disagreement between both groups occurs often, pushing further states into passing laws to restrict abortion, such as parental notification, waiting periods and ultrasound requirements. In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the first federal law banning abortion procedures and allowed politicians to interfere in the private health care decisions of women and their families. This federal abortion ban criminalizes abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy, which doctors claim are usually the safest and most effective way of protecting women 's health. Although abortion is currently legal in the United States, individual states have the ability to regulate and limit the use of abortion due to Article IV in the Constitution, which states that “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a

Web. 1 Dec. 2014. <http://www.bpas.org/bpaswoman/Surgical abortion>. "Introduction to Abortion." Controversial Issue.

Opening statement and paper focus- abortion is the most controversial right being debated today Abortion is the deliberate ending of a pregnancy by removing

Laws have been established in many states to promote or hinder access to abortions. Medoff (2015) designed a study to determine if restrictive state abortion laws had a significant effect

Since it is necessary to take birth control pills every day for prevention of pregnancy, birth control is for only particular people having enough money. According to CBSNEWS, compared with wealthier counterparts, there are far more unplanned pregnant women who are low-income due to their lack of affordable birth control pills. Additionally, Washington University reveals the fact that the annual birth rate of 15 to 19-year old girl who was accessible to free birth control was 6.3 per 1000 while that of girls the same age who had no access to free birth control was 34.4 per 1000. Even though some people concern about harmful influence on mother’s health and insist that abortion is less harmful for mother, Guardian News found that “worldwide 47000 women die each year as a result of unsafe abortion.” That is, having no abortion saves 47000 people’s life each year rather having bad effect on mother’s body. Therefore, free birth control is a remarkable way to diminish

Abortion is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy that is most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. The large majority of the world's people-in developing and developed countries-live in areas where abortion is legal at least for health reasons, and the recent trend has been toward further liberalization of laws. Where abortion services are not legal, they are frequently available from physicians to women who can afford to pay for them. Abortions provided by medically trained personnel have proved to be much safer than childbirth. However, mortality related to non medical abortions are still major public health problems in areas where medical abortions are unavailable.

Many women who want an abortion are from low income and/or broken families. It is needed because they are worried around money and rely on insurance to help pay for the procedure. Without the insurance to help cover the procedure - which can be up to 1,500 dollars - it makes it hard for these women to get them. These laws are established to make abortions safer for women but many of them are making it harder to obtain an abortion and making women wait longer for their procedures.

Making abortion illegal forces women to undergo unregulated and dangerous procedures that put their lives and future reproductive health at risk. Recent research carried out by Sedgh et al. (2016) has found that during 2010–2014, an approximated 6.5 million unregulated abortions occurred every year in Latin America, up to 4.4 million during 1990–1994, and at least 10% of all maternal deaths were due to insecure abortion annually. The reason for maternal morbidity is due to abortion complications such as uterus perforation or disease of the reproductive tract, forcing women to seek for urgency medical operations at public hospital. Consequently, approximately 800,000 Latin American women have hospitalised for such complications annually. The data

Although the frequency of abortion has declined in the U.S., its controversy created a social conflict that echoes the inequality of women and their right to choose what to do with their own bodies. Nonetheless, there are other questions regarding abortion that is conflicting with society. A couple of those reasons of those reasons include when, where, and how to get proper abortion procedures or why the woman is seeking an abortion. Each of these decisions is delicate and carries its own weight and should be handled accordingly. Determining a safe method of abortion is wise for the mother to lessen the chance of long term health problems, death, or psychological problems. However, many people are unaware of how they get

Throughout history, women have been oppressed by their rights. Women have been seen as nothing else but a mother that works in the home. Anything out of childcare and housekeeping was considered abnormal. And slowly as time has passed women have gained more rights. But in recent news, one topic has always been controversial - abortions. Abortions is a medical procedure that terminates a fetus while in the mother’s womb. Before abortions became legal, women were performing their abortions without medical assistant putting them at more risk. After it became law more women began to seek help, but there are still some restrictions on whom can get a safe abortion. Women have to go to extreme measures to get a safe abortion, and with the more restriction, some women have turned away from professional aid and have begun to use different tactics. The more restrictions there is, the more pain there is for some women.