Destruction Of The Armada Research Paper

I think the most important reason as to why the Spanish Armada failed was because of Medina Sidonia (the Spanish leader). This is because he was a poor leader and has never been a noble leader also in the DVD it said that Medina Sidonia’s mother even doubted him. Additionally he was sea sick which wouldn’t really help the Spanish because it would be hard for him to controlling everything. The tactics that Medina Sidonia used didn’t work well as none of his strategies worked such as the Spanish used a crescent formation. This was useless as if they tried to fire they would have destroyed their own ships as a result it meant that only a few certain ships were able to fire the cannons and the formation got split up.

In addition, there were many domestic and foreign policies Philip II created during his rule in power. One policy he created was against the Muslims. As of the year that he created the policy, he lost half of the strength of his navy from losing wars with the Turkish Empire, as talked about before ("Philip II"). While attempting to repair his navy back to its full strength once again, the Muslim pirates attacked Spain. Prisoners were taken, but King Philip was able to bring back his navy, but soon enough, the Turks attacked again and it was looking very poor for Spain at this point ("Good King Philip?"). After many more small wars, both sides were left with very little military presence, so Spain and France signed a truce. Philip II also created a two-fold policy: “He sent ministers to Portugal to build up support for him being king which would have meant Spain absorbing Portugal into her kingdom” (Trueman). He also created a very large army, also stated above. The noblemen of Portugal supported Philip II, and also clearly hoped to get rewards for their support. Nearly all of the problems Philip II faced were results of his policies and problems that were soon to be fixed.

These natural circumstances prevented the English ships from being able to leave the harbor. There was almost nothing the English could do but wait for the tide to turn. If fact, Drake and Howard finished playing a game of bowls even after they got the news that the Spanish Armada was approaching. Their inability to leave the port set them at a disadvantage; however, the Spanish did not take the opportunity to attack them while they were practically defenseless. Instead, they kept on sailing towards Flanders. This lack of aggression on the Spanish part is due to the fact that the Armada did not have many offensive military strategies. If the Spanish were more prepared to fight a sea battle, they most likely could have sailed into Plymouth Harbor and attacked without much opposition. Nevertheless, that was not the case, so the Armada kept sailing and was forced to miss what could have been an opportunity for an easy and effective

I believe that the reason the Spanish Armada failed to invade England was for two reasons; the first being due to bad weather, the second due to the hell burners. I chose bad weather and hell burners because without the strong winds the hell burners would not have reached their destination (the ships). The reason the hell burners are involved in the failure of the armada are because, they (the Spanish) were Catholics, so fire symbolises hell (from the name hell burner) and death. During the panic about the hell burners the Armada lost their defensive formation, ships and lives. If the weather was not bad they wouldn’t have needed to return back to get the ships repaired because there wouldn’t have been a storm. To conclude without bad weather

The Spanish armada started in 1588 and finished around a month later. The Spanish lost dramatically for several reasons. This essay will tell you why the Spanish failed so badly and why England won.

Philip II and Elizabeth I are two of the most important figures during the 16th century. Philip played a major role in Spain once his father (Charles V) stepped down while Elizabeth was a key figure in England as she ruled and showed her feminism. Both figures had a rough path to lead as the subjects were always a problem. To understand Philip carefully, the full history of his reign is crucial when looking at Spain. Challenges were already given to him from his father and Philip had to learn fast. On the other hand, Elizabeth had a rough childhood and she had to win over her subjects. Through critical examination of primary sources, strategic characteristics will be presented while under what influence they were in throughout their reign. Therefore, the opposite backgrounds to the throne, resistance from subjects, and different strategies ultimately led these two together through war.

How far can the abdication of Charles I in 1555 be considered a key turning point in Spanish History 1474-1598? After the abdication of Charles I in 1555, his son Philip II became King of Spain, leaving a country that had experienced many difficulties through the last century. Events such as Civil rebellions, an uncertain monarchy and non-uniform religions had struck Spain, and various events had affected its history. However, while the abdication was an important turning point in Spanish history, there are various other events that also impacted it greatly.

Before the Spanish invasion The goldsmith was abundant before the Spaniards arrived each culture or indigenous community working in different ways and made different items such as punches, chisels, axes, needles, hooks; these objects performed with messages or content that could transmit symbolic figures of gods or offerings Dios.Los offered to some people who inhabited America before the conquest had reached to develop urban societies, while others only practiced a simple farming or engaged in hunting and gathering. The Mayans, Aztecs and Incas built complex irrigation works, applied agricultural techniques and organized theocratic states. They also invented a calendar of 365 days (while Europe was guided by the Gregorian less accurate than

Also, before Philip sent the ships out Admiral Sanata Cruz, Spain?s best sailor, died and Philip replaced him with the Duke of Medina-Sidonia, who suffered from seasickness and did not really want to do the job. Was this a good idea? And should the Spanish of waited to find a new leader who wanted to do the job?

In 1588, King Philip II of Spain sent a fleet of one hundred and thirty ships to her majesty Elizabeth I’s England to ultimately eradicate Protestantism. His country, Spain, was fully Catholic, so being Protestant would have been considered an act of high treason. Already provoked by England’s their religious intent, he was pushed over the edge when they started pirating ships from the Spanish Netherlands (currently the Netherlands, formerly ruled by Spain) for goods. He sent over a mighty fleet commanded by Admiral Marquis of Santa Cruz and the Duke of Medina Sidonia to regain control of the North Sea and exterminate Protestantism. Despite being vastly outnumbered, due to ingenuity, skill, and luck, the English forces were able to

The Spanish Armada is about a boat that set sail in July 1588 by the Spanish, and it was ordered by the catholic King Philip ii of Spain to invade England and take down the protestant Queen Elizabeth i. Queen Elizabeth i, was catholic but then became protestant. The Church did not like her decision and they wanted her to become catholic again, so the Pope encouraged King Philip ii of Spain if he could try to make England catholic again. King Philip agreed to do what the Pope had asked of him. For years King Philip ii wanted England and he was in need of a Queen and since Elizabeth i was not wed he proposed to Elizabeth over and over again, but Elizabeth wanted to make the decisions and wanted to be in charge for her country and she did not want to marry because she did not want to be told what to do by her husband, so she declined all of Philip’s marriage proposals. Philip agreed that he would give her time and he would be willing to be patient for her and the throne, and wait for Elizabeth to accept his proposal.

That is interesting how they could not find any reasoning behind calling the ship “she.” Maybe it is another tribute to Athena? For the "Battlefield England: Spanish Armada" video, I agree with what you said about it seeming like neither side really won. Spain had definitely lost with only a third of the people surviving and dozens of ships being destroyed. Though England won in keeping the Spanish from invading, it is crazy that the nobles were refusing to pay the crew members. I was surprised that there was not more celebration and rewards for the crew after avoiding an invasion from the Spanish that could have been so fatal to the English crown. I also found it interesting that Mayans lived while Europeans were going through the Dark Ages

Between the years of 1535 and 1547, some sixty-six Spanish ships were captured by French corsairs (Lane 19). Shortly after in the 1550’s, the Spanish came to regret their passive defense strategy when French corsairs made their most punishing raids ever on the Spanish West Indies. They descended on colonies like Puerto Rico, Hispaniola and Cuba, and caused heavy destruction that they never really recovered from. Finally in the early 1560’s, Spain was forced to react with expensive long-term defenses. Since the Spanish waited so long to do so they not only lost wealth because of what was captured, but now they also had to spend money to protect what was left.

The Spanish Armada was Dated in1588.Fleet assembled by King Phillip II of Spain to invade England.The Armada was defeated by the skill of British military leaders and by rough seas during the assault. England's victory over Spanish forces established England as an emerging sea power; it was one of the great achievements of Queen Elizabeth I. Deafeat helped bring the decline of Spanish empire.

The Spanish armada was the attempted Spanish invasion of England. This invasion was set into action to stop the heresy, king Philip II of Spain had claimed Elizabeth I of doing as she had accepted the protestant form of Christianity and implemented it throughout England. the Spanish set off with 130 ships and the English had significantly fewer ships, that were much smaller. The Armada ultimately but the cause of this failure had been heavily debated. Some historians argue that it was due to English having many advantages over them both in their leadership and their tactics. Others argue that it was due to the storm that scattered the ships. Many also argue that the Spanish unpreparedness was the fundamental reason for the failure of the Armada as they lacked experience and skill, and their failure was inevitable.