Developing A Rationale And Process For Selecting Individuals

Butcher, D. (2008, November 13). 5 Strategies for managing employees after layoffs. Industry market trends. Industry market trends rss. Retrieved from http://news.thomasnet.com/IMT/2008/11/13/5-strategies-for-employers-managing-surviving-employees-after-layoffs/

If Avie is required to lay off some employees hired for the third shift, the best way to determine who should be laid off is based on seniority and/or ability. The ability of employees to change jobs and learn new skills, along with their performance is heavily weighed when making layoff decisions. Since Avie is not unionized, layoffs to senior employees can still occur. The practice of using seniority as the basis for layoffs may have an impact on women and minority groups who often have less seniority than others.

Layoffs are not always the best solution for a decline in company profits. A business must resolve the conflict that exists between their responsibility to meet economic targets and the ethical responsibility of non-maleficence. Furthermore, it must be determined if the layoffs would even maximize stakeholder welfare from a utilitarian perspective (Arce & Xin Li, 2011).

Knowing that the company has a 20% turn over in Full Time Employees and an average 15% turn over in Part Time Employees, I believe they should assess their mix of full and part time staff. It would be beneficial and potentially cost saving if the company can increase its part time staff, reduce full time staff, thus, if all things remain constant, realize a lower turnover ratio while paying less in overall benefits and compensation by changing the mix of employees. Determining the proper mix of staffing efficiently will be a key driver in the overall HR process and hiring outcome and should be a long term goal of the company

Retaining employees is one way the turnover rate can decrease, Branham (2000), focuses on retaining valuable employees by incorporating four key elements. The first key elements is, “be a company that people want to work for”. There are many companies that have been labeled as, “employers of choice”. These employers all have something in common, which is how they value their employers (Branham, 2000). They treat their employees with respect and like family. With being an “employer of choice,” people are the most valuable asset; not just customers but employees too. Many companies go above and beyond for their customers, but not for their employees, yet they wonder why they are losing valuable talent.

In this paper Team C has discussed the issue of poor employee retention concluding in a high employee turnover rate. This is an issue that can be common among some companies and that is a great example of

The effect of mismanaged LAYOFFs on the remaining workforce and the effects, lack of management preparation, the human condition, and lack of mitigation strategies. We think that the problem with this article is that not enough managers or HR personal, know how to let a person go from their employment effectively. They sometimes don't realize the impact that it has on the other employees morals. Also, that sometimes companies don't take a closer look to make sure downsizing will be the answer to cutting costs like they think that it will. Every HR or manager should be let go in their lifetime so

1.3,NAD, UNIT13, Evaluate different approaches that may be used to ensure the selection of the best individuals for work in health and social care.

Even though employee retention starts with attracting potential employees, today’s society has placed a new and greater demand for skilled and educated employees as new hires for their companies. These employees, however, are starting to become harder and harder to find. So

Because the objective is to choose one staff member to lay off, I will employ a simple ranking system as described in chapter 11 of our text (Moran, Stueart, & Morner, 2013, p. 223, and rank the employees in order from most beneficial to the library to least. In this case, I think that “most beneficial” goes a bit further that job performance, but includes other factors such as flexibility of schedule and cost of keeping this employee on staff. The employee I rank lowest will be the employee I choose to lay off.

Many companies look to salaries and benefits as the first places to cut back when looking to make changes that involve cost-saving. When this happens, it is inevitable that some employees will leave the company to seek employment elsewhere. The employees that remain, whether they stay voluntarily or because they could not find employment elsewhere, are often resentful. Motivation decreases, taking job performance along with it. Employees lose their company loyalty and may even become angry enough to purposefully sabotage the company.

A critical factor to the success of any company is its ability to attract top talent while retaining those already working within the company. Losing employees can have a significant impact on a company’s morale, productivity and overall profit.

The job market today is difficult for both employees and employers. It hurts emotionally and financially to lose a job, and it is equally painful to have to terminate someone. Both sides struggle. If you work for an organization that may be facing layoffs, being prepared helps. Below are some tips

Strategic human resource management (SHRM) is the study and analysis of human resource (HR) strategies adopted by companies in an attempt to measure the impacts on employee performance. The domain has evolved to encompass particular aspects of HR, such as recruitment and selection, construction of formal HR policies, and refining company practices. Ideally, these features assist to attract, progress, encourage, and retain employees who in return contribute to the effective performance and survival of the organization. In an attempt to achieve this, organizations are adopting strategies to reduce voluntary employee turnover, which is defined as an employee’s decisions to voluntary terminate an employment relationship. Generally regarded as the most significant issue that voluntary turnover poses is the cost to an organization, embedded in hiring and training a replacement worker, training and development programs, and administration setup which not only drains an organizations profit but also expends valuable time and effort. Exploring beyond monetary costs, the implications of high voluntary turnover rates extends to the loss of valuable human capital which effects the motivation and productivity of remaining employees, and shifts the workplace morale. Furthermore, a loss of an employee may prove critical to the organizations reputation from both an insider and outsider perspective. These issues

According to Bloomberg, the retail sector is experiencing staff turnover rate of roughly 5% per month. In following the trend, Wal-Mart would lose 60% of employees on average (Mayer & Noiseux, 2015). Employees site multiple reasons for leaving voluntarily or termination due to lack of job training, and employee recognition Lieb & Lieb, 2013). Companies currently have less than stellar strategies retaining employees resulting in the high turnover rates, which affect profitability (Das, 2015).