Developing Manager

The advantage of the Autocratic leadership style is that it improves efficiency and productivity in addition to be able to quickly respond to

A democratic leader generally accept any opinion and voices which means that the team would feel free to voice their opinions and ideas without them being dismissed straight away. The positive side to this style is that the team/workforce can be highly motivated, skilled and experienced members can be used in decision making which makes them feel more committed and could less resistant to managerial changes it also help with communication between the workforce and the managers. The negative side to this style is that individuals can dominate participation or make disruptive contributions it can also be very time consuming for the leader because of the two communication it can also result in actions that are the most effective and also people may view this style as incompetent to handle the job responsibilities.

It is characterized by the collective decision-making of its followers. Democratic leaders offer their followers choices and support. They hold no formal position of power and gain their authority through active participation and delegation of tasks and responsibilities. This style reflects democratic principles that include inclusiveness and equal participation. Democratic style of leadership works best in a public university, a democratic nation or a close-knit neighborhood. As discussed during the presentations, some of the past leaders known for their democratic style of leadership are George Washington or Tommy

Democratic leadership style is where the leaders and members work together to make decisions. Its 'shared leadership'. Everyone in the team is involved

Autocratic Approach: Autocratic leadership gives a positive belief about the updates about any policies. However this kind of approach is not highly regarded by many of the working environments. This is due to the amendments being brought into use prematurely for the uses to access them. This approach of leadership and management may be viewed as being too authoritative.

Democratic leadership usually requires votes. In a democratic leadership, everyone's participating, and everyone is aware of the decision made (Myers, D., 2012). Therefore, avoiding qualms about the decision. It is easier to change leadership positions providing everyone with an equal opportunity at leadership role in this system. If the decision made is incorrect everyone takes the equal responsibility (Myers, D., 2012). Another

Autocratic leadership, is a style which is characterized by the individual control over all the decisions and little input from group members. These type of leaders rarely accept advice from followers. These type of leaders tend to be bossy and controlling. Failing to consult with other team members in such situations hurts the overall success of the group.

In a democratic leadership style, the decision making process and overall responsibility among team members is shared. Decisions are made by the leader consulting each member of the team; therefore the outcome becomes a group effort. In the democratic leadership style, tasks are delegated to employees effectively, where the implementation is mostly in their hands. As opposed to the authoritarian leadership style, the democratic leader welcomes feedback from every team member. Team members are also encouraged to function as a

Autocratic leadership is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute control over a group.

Leadership can be defined as the ability to lead a group of people successfully in an organization. Hall, et al (2008) have mentioned that an effective leader has to be visionary, motivating and responsible in order to successfully run a business organization. In business the two key leadership styles, which are widely used in today’s corporate world are autocratic leadership and democratic leadership (Johnson, n.d.). Autocratic leadership may be explained as “a leadership style where the manager sets objectives, allocates tasks and insists on obedience” (Hall, et al 2008 p.g 401). Conversely, democratic leadership encourages “participation in decision making” (Hall, et al 2008 p.g 402). Whilst many people would consider autocratic

Many leaders who start pursuing leadership development are often trying to improve upon their organisations autocratic leadership style.

Supervision should be planned and adopted to the changing conditions. It calls for good planning and organization.

Management comes with countless responsibilities in order for the business to run smoothly and successfully. In order to achieve the goals of the company as well as the managers own goals, it is essential to keep employees motivated, keep the customer satisfied, and increase profits. “Management is defined as the process of administering and coordinating resources effectively, efficiently, and in an effort to achieve the goals of the organization.” (Lewis, 5).

I believe you learn about leadership by acting as an example. You should be prepared to do the things you are asking others to do by getting on your hands and knees, if need be, and get your hands dirty. This engraves a picture into the mind of an employee or subordinate to what type of a manager you are. In this paper, I will cover the role a manager plays in an organization describing four functions of management: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. I will then describe three traits: conceptual, human, and technical, which an individual must possess to become a successful manager within an organization and how they fit in with the four functions.

Peter Spurgeon and Robert Cragg (2007) contend the current attention paid to the importance of leadership has diminished the value and contribution of management. The discussion concerning leadership and management, at the most extreme, is inclined to portray leadership as 'good' and management as 'bad'. These constraints are rooted in the proposition that people do not want to be managed, with its connotations of bureaucracy and control, but are happy to follow a leader toward a vision. At the core of this perception is the belief that leaders are concerned with the future and with the people in the system, while managers are focused upon greater efficiency and immediate results.