In the beginning, the challenge I faced while developing my argument understands the topic and argument I wanted to present. I had brainstormed a list of issues around business to get a better understanding and chose the issue that was most important to me. However, I had a hard time summing up my essay in my thesis. If done differently I would have waited to do a reverse outline in order to get my thesis statement instead of wasting time on it toward the beginning. Another obstacle faced was presenting creditable sources. I should have started with more scholarly sources to avoid changing my key
In this article titled “Analyzing Arguments: Those You Read and Those You Write” goes over multiple strategies and examples to help you analyze the meaning and purpose of a specific argument and how to strengthen your own.
The argument on whether or not racing is a sport or race car drivers are athletes has existed as long as racing has been around. It has been a debate that has stirred up great controversy and has divided up the fan base of all sports on this subject matter. Many people on the subject matter will pick a side but usually will not have any evidence or reasonable explanations as to why they chose that position. In “Round the Track: it might look simple, but racing takes athletic skill”, Bob Pockrass provides the reader with evidence from a “Sport Sciences” story for ESPN what a Nascar Sprint Cup driver’s body endure through out a race. In the second article “Drivers may not be athletes, but what they do is no game”, Ed Hilton provides the reader
Yes. The author gives many moral reasons why he believes an invasion on Iraq would be wrong.
Through understanding the errors, I made in Writing Assignment #3 (WA #3) I was able to edit and better understand what corrections was needed for Writing Assignment #4 (WA #4) to become a well thought out paper. For WA #3 I received a B+ because of the lack of further development in my argument, which made the voice in the argument, the context behind sources and the thesis weaker.
The stakeholders of Penn State held different opinions. Some believe the university should be criticized for its lack of compassion for the victims and its failure to keep a child predator from being present and around children. Others feel that the scandal produced a witch-hunt with authorities looking to point the finger at others (Crandall, Parnell, & Spillan,
Throughout our lives, we will come across other individuals whose opinions differ from ours. Whether we decide to shadow their beliefs or stay strong to our own, it is how we handle the situation, as well as what we take from it, that shapes our character. I am now aware that, for the most part, it is best to have your own voice and remain firm to what you believe in instead of changing your views in order to please others just to fit in.
A) Start by crafting one basic analytical argument concerning any aspect of each story. An analytical argument is an argument that helps us view the story in a new or unique way. A good analytical argument will clarify some aspect of the story or help others "make sense" of the story. Your argument can address anything: main themes, character analyses, symbolism, etc. Make sure you use evidence from the story to support your argument.
The main assertion of this entire essay is that people will treat you differently and judge you based on your ability to speak english fluently, and because of this peoples lives can be changed.
Treason is a political crime committed against a state or government to which the person charged with treason owes a duty of allegiance. The dictionary defines treason as a violation of allegiance toward one’s country or sovereign, especially the betrayal of ones country by waging war against it or by consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies. The men signing the declaration of independence were aware of the risk they ran of committing treason against the British king. The value that defense remained to be determined in a civil war. In civil wars, every man chooses his party, but generally that side with prevails arrogates the right of treating those who are vanquished as rebels. In the weeks preceding the Declaration of Independence,
Additionally, for example, if a Catholic student were not able to have meat on Friday, the school should provide many options.
In 1976, Congress passed the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) in response to a growing national concern about public exposure to toxic chemicals. Since then, it has largely been hailed as a failure for two reasons. First, TSCA has been unable to effectively compel producers to test and disclose adequate information on chemical toxicity. Second, it has been ineffective at designating sufficient resources to the EPA to identify and reduce the possible health and environmental risks associated with new chemicals. Nonetheless, it has been devoid of major revisions since its implementation. In the nearly 40 years of congressional inaction on this issue, many states have intervened by enacting stricter chemical laws that fill in TSCA’s gaps.
On July 27, 2004, Barack Obama delivered a keynote address at the Democratic National Convention that catapulted him onto the national stage and decidedly set in motion the rest of his political career. In it, Obama addresses controversial topics while simultaneously maintaining an underlying theme of collaboration and common experiences. His arguments can be comprehensively analyzed following the Toulmin model of argumentation. This model consists primarily of a claim, which is the assertion the rhetor attempts to prove, supporting evidence for the claim, and a warrant connecting the evidence to the claim. Secondary elements of this model include backing supporting the warrant, the
-Some may disagree with me because banning larger drinks will just make people buy more smaller sized drinks allowing them to take in more sugar and calories.
Who was the specific audience of your blog Public Argument? Include specifics that make the audience unique, such as their experiences or perspectives related to your topic.
Waite and Gallagher also discuss the benefits that marriage gives to couples. Including the financial benefits, in that through specialization and by sharing incomes getting married boosts standard of living by thirty percent and this benefit is not incurred by cohabitating, as those who cohabitate do not share as much and are less committed to the wellbeing of their partner. In addition to the financial benefits, they also discuss the emotional benefits of knowing you have someone who loves you and who would take care of you. Children similarly benefit from having married parents as there are more financial resources available to help take care of them and they get to spend more time with at least one parent.