Selecting the right approach to developing new software can make or break the success of the project. There are two different types of approaches to the system development life cycle: predictive and adaptive (John W. Satzinger, 2012). The predictive approach establishes a structured thorough framework that incorporates detailed planning sessions around a well-known project (John W. Satzinger, 2012). This approach initiates sequential phases that drive the project to the finish line, without backtracking between the levels. The adaptive approach is more interactive and does not contain the same amount of structure (John W. Satzinger, 2012). It allows project teams to adapt to the changing circumstances around the system development and the flexibility to modify system requirement or needs that were not well established from the beginning (John W. Satzinger, 2012).
Within the predictive and adaptive approaches to system development, there are specific sub-processes that a company can choose for development. For the purposes of our assignment, I’ve chosen two sub-processes that differ in speed of completion and environments: the waterfall model and agile methods of development. These approaches incorporate completely different ideologies and techniques to complete the system development life cycle. Both processes have their own advantages and disadvantages as well as preferred situations or projects that would be more successful.
“The Demise of the Waterfall Model is Imminent”
The system development life cycle is a formal four-step process that can be followed in order to identify a problem and solve it. The first step is
Another way of successfully gathering information is by building a prototype or model of the system, so that users can test or get an idea of what the finished product will be like. With this they can determine issues, problems, or inconsistency with the system. Another important part of gathering information is organizing it so that it can be understood and put to proper use. I propose categorizing the requirements into functional requirements, operational requirements, technical requirements, and transitional requirements. The functional requirements define how the user thinks the system is functioning overall, the operational requirements define what background processes need to be executed in order for the system to work optimally over a period of time, the technical requirements define what technical issues that must be addressed in order to successfully implement the system, and the transitional requirements define the processes or steps needed to implement the system smoothly and successfully. ("Mind Tools", 2012).
A: In the software lifecycle there are 4 phases that are derived from the old System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and they are as follow; Planning, Implementation, Maintenance, and the Removal process. The planning phase is defined by all planning activities including the analysis of the software to be installed, verification of its compatibility, supported methods of installations, and the identification of any risks associated with the software and the desired deployment method. The Implementation phase is used to prepare for deployment such as; creating a shared access location for files and creating or using the appropriate package files. After all these steps have been
Cost and resource needs are higher for traditional than Agile due to Waterfall’s sequential development phase of all requirements determined in the beginning, software design and finally implementation of master design. The need for all information up front takes substantial time to gather and the sequential design does not allow for project changes as the flow enters into the programming stage. With Agile, costs remain low because there exists an incremental and iterative approach to the project, meaning less time is used to collect all requirements up front, the
Agile processes do not devote much time up front to formal system specifications, but rather relies on continuous communication with the customer throughout the development process. The process accounts for the fact that needs often change or cannot be fully developed early on and is flexible to this. (+)
The preferred methodologies for managing a software’s lifecycle are a major factor in deciding how a firm reacts to market demands. The major SDLC frameworks followed are the waterfall model, Agile methodology (scrum) and Kanban. We will discuss this answer
Team Mates as you know that we have chosen the Requirements in System Development Life Cycle, so have came across the following stages in the Requirements in my research which will be posted below specifically under their requirements.
First, let’s take a look at Agile, in particular the role of scope. Several traditional software development models came about in the 1960s, such as incremental, spiral and waterfall modelling. Over time it was realized that the software development team did not realize all of the needs up front. Thus, the customer was was not delivered what was expected. It’s essential to have an outline of who, what, when and where but this is often a transforming list.
As the world became more and more dependent on technology with each passing day, software automatically became an important organ for development. Since software is needed almost everywhere today, its development is a highly intelligent and precise process, involving various steps. Known as software development life cycle, these steps include planning, analysis, design, development & implementation, testing and maintenance. These steps go on to create the perfect software for clients. ”
Project Pluto will adopt the Incremental-build model to deliver the required objectives. It is a build-test-demonstrate model of iterative development in which frequent demonstrations of progress and verification and validation of work to date are emphasized. Business requirements are allocated to various elements of the software architecture, and the architecture is partitioned into a prioritized sequence of builds. Each build adds new capabilities to the incrementally growing product. The Incremental-build model provides Project Pluto with the “advantages of continuous integration, verification, and validation of the evolving product, frequent demonstration of progress, early warning of problems, early delivery of subset capabilities, and systematic incorporation of rework that may occur during the software development” (Fairley, 2009, p. 64).
It has been observed that in software development, change is unavoidable and must be accommodated for in the life cycle. A number of alternative process models have been introduced in order to attempt to fix the issues in the Waterfall model. An early modification to the standard Waterfall method introduced prototyping as a feedback and discovery mechanism to identify misunderstandings and omissions early on in the process (Neill, 2004). Other process models attempted to further get rid of the risks of misunderstandings by breaking down projects
This paper describes Agile development methodologies and their benefits. Section II presents key elements of Agile. Section III presents benefits of Agile development methodologies over traditional waterfall methodologies.
Extensively Involved in Installation, Configuration, and Administration of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2010/2013 on medium farm environment
Though many people interchange system engineering models and software engineering life cycle models, they are defined as two different approaches to software development. System engineering is the technical and technical management process that results in delivered products and systems that exhibit the best balance of cost and performance. As the program progresses from one phase to the next one, so does the system engineering process. It deals with the overall management of engineering project during their life cycle. Its main focus is knowing what the clients and end users wants and needs are satisfied and developing just that all the way through the system’s entire life cycle. Whereas, on the other hand, software engineering focuses on the quality of the product or system, how cost effective it is, is it done within the time-constraints given, whether it is easy to maintain and enhance, and does it work as the requirements defined. Its main focus is on delivering a product that meets the requirement specifications. There are so many models to choose from, as it all depends on what the project needs and entails. Depending on the requirements, allows for the choice of what mode to use.
There are 3 types of system development methodologies as mentioned in Task 1. We choose Agile System Development Methodology and Waterfall System Development Methodology.