Developing a framework for critiquing health research

This literature review has enhanced my knowledge on research articles, how to identify what is a strong or weak study, how to research properly and also, it enhanced my critiquing skill. It is identified that recruiting mental health nurses and mental health is one of the undesirable nursing field of new graduates is a significant contemporary issue in nursing because of the ageing nursing working and the increasing numbers of clients with mental illness (Harrison et al., 2014, pp.561-562).

A critical appraisal was completed to assess the value of the research study conducted by Batch & Windsor (2014). This was completed through the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), which is a tool used to evaluate different research articles (CASP, 2014). I assessed that this article has significance, particularly for the nursing profession. Nevertheless, sections of this article could have been further developed by expanding the topic through using a greater variety of hospital settings and more diverse patient populations. Ethnography in the healthcare setting has been examined in the Nursing 1028 course. This article used an ethnographic framework to develop further assessment on such elements such as culture, disparities and gain comprehension of how nurses communicate (Batch & Windsor, 2014).

Quantitative and qualitative research studies are both significant in nursing. In this paper, I will be critiquing two articles using both approaches. Using Walden’s database system, the articles will be located and compared to one another. After this assignment, I hope to gain a better understanding if critiquing research articles.

Different types of research studies form the basis of evidence-based practice among many different aspects of health care. Qualitative research studies look at the most complex issues nurses face today and there is an emphasis on the need for more studies of this type. Critiquing qualitative research studies validate the study and provides a smooth transition incorporating the findings into clinical practice. Therefore, developing and maintaining the skills for critiquing research is a core nursing skill. However, many nurse professionals do not feel fully confident in critically appraising qualitative research studies. Nurses who are not comfortable with their skills in determining the quality of research studies, can spend ample amounts of time and challenges due to the language of research. The purpose of this paper is to systematically appraise a published research article, using the critiquing framework by Polit and Beck (2012). The paper chosen to be critiqued is a descriptive qualitative article that is titled “How Christian Nurses Converse With Patients About Spirituality” by Pfeiffer, Gober and Taylor (2014) published in the Journal of Clinical Nursing.

(2010). Qualitative research should understand the feelings of the patients, experience and the perception of health care professional (Franzel et.al 2013). This assignment will focus on the critical appraisal of quality nursing care in the word of nurses. This appraisal will be assed according to the skill I have learned during this semester (Ingham and Broomfield, 2014). The evidence of this article falls under the hierarchies of evidence of research. Critically appraisal is the systematic process where research are carefully and methodically investigate and evaluate its trustworthiness, value and importance in particular context (Groves, Burns ,& Gray, 2013). Any health professional should have an ability to appraise the article critically so that, they can they can easily detect its strength and weakness. As, a result health professional can utilize only the accurate practice from that research. The purpose of this essay is to develop the skill which provide the sense of scientific evidence based on validity and result. Additionally, this essay will explore the various aspect to appraise the qualitative research article which include, title, author, abstract, introduction, methodology and methods, results, limitation and conclusion.

This is a reflective essay using Gibb’s model of reflection. It is a six-way overview valuation process which highlights effective practice through conditions of evidence and widens knowledge and experiences and grows confidence that if the situation is repeated the practitioner will be better equipped to deal with it. The components of the six-overviews are; description, feelings, evaluation, analysis, conclusion and an action plan (Gibbs, 1998). It is an outline of an experience I had whilst on placement in a surgical ward in an acute hospital in relation to delivery of bad news. All names and identities of the patients and hospital have been changed to maintain confidentially in accordance with the Nursing Midwifery Council (NMC, 2015). Ingram (2017) advised that primary care agencies to use reflective practice and encourage integrated working with all professionals within the community and hospitals of the local trust. I had chosen Gibb’s model of reflection as it allow a structured and thorough account of the incident be develop and enable the implementation of an appropriate action which can be taken if a similar event occur in the future.

According to Young and Solomon (2009) critical appraisal is a systematic process which can identify both, the strengths and weaknesses of a research study. During this process the reader is able to assess studies’ usefulness and whether or not the findings are trustworthy, it also supports in decision making in terms of whether to apply the study’s results in practice

A research critique is done to provide an effective theoretical foundation to guide health care providers in formulating evidence-based practices. At the end of a critique, the nurse will be able to lead into conclusions based on the results, strengths, limitations, and methods used in a research article. The study that I will be critiquing is focused on how nurses are knowledgeable with regards to providing care of patients in palliative treatment and therapy. I have always perceived palliative means the alleviation of an individual from certain factors that causes enough distress, stress, and limitless discomfort, which not only affects the patient, but also inflicts emotional, physical, and mental suffering to the family, and other people

Analyze and critique a quantitative nursing research article from a nursing research journal published within the past five years. Include 3 scholarly references—the article, the text, and one outside source. Use the Guidelines for Quantitative Nursing Research Critique to complete the following steps:

Reflective Practice within Nursing has been defined ‘as a process that develops understanding of what it means to be a practitioner’ (Rolfe, 1998) and follows on with the ‘theory and practice through the practitioner consciously thinking through the experience’ (Jasper, 2003). This is of great importance regarding a practitioner, especially one in learning, as they are able to develop a better understanding of their role and offers support when learning new skills. In Nursing, Reflection plays a huge role. Most of the opportunities to learn and develop knowledge come best when learnt through practice and subsequently will be found in a practice environment.

Proper critiquing is also vital when holding a position of management to oversee interventions implemented by other nurses under my supervision. Critiques may likewise be done as learning experiences or to help give suitable input to the creator before distribution. As for this situation, I have critiqued 2 research articles as an instructive affair for my nursing education. Peltzer, Domian, and Teel (2015) examine the everyday impacts of having a HIV positive status as a youthful African-American woman in a Midwestern metropolitan city. Udonkhamsuk, Fongkaew, Grimes, Viseskul, and Kasatpibal (2014) examine the treatment adherence of Thai youth who are likewise living with an HIV/Helps status. The significance of the critique of these research articles and evidenced based practice is to understand the strategy for thinking, for teaching, and for nursing proposals for HIV/AIDS positive patients. Moreover will give spots for advancement in our healthcare framework

Critical thinking is known as two different definitions. A common academic definition for critical thinking is “the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form judgment (Google).” In nursing, critical thinking is known as “purposeful, self-regulatory judgment which results in interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, as well as the explanation of the evidential, conceptual, methodological, criteriological, or contextual considerations upon which that judgment was based (Turner, 2005).” Although, these two definitions are similar, the nursing definition is more in-depth and clearly leans more towards how critical thinking is important for the nursing profession. Academic critical thinking is used in everyday life whether

Does research utilization impact critical thinking in newly graduated nurses? Does critical thinking influence a nurse’s outlook on research use in clinical practice? A cross-sectional

The Australia Nursing & Midwifery Council (ANMC) states the following about critical thinking and analysis, “This relates to self – appraisal, professional development, and the value of evidence and research for practice. Reflecting on practice, feelings and beliefs and the consequences of these for individuals/groups is an important professional benchmark.” (p.2). Also under the ANMC competencies nurses have a duty of care to their patients to that complies within the current legislation governing nursing practice.

Throughout this assignment the essential underpinning principles of the nursing assessment process exploring what it is, why we do it and what factors influence the nursing process will be discussed. Also discussed in this paper will be the holistic aspects of the assessment process as well as an example of an assessment tool I used on a recent placement. I will explore the effectiveness of my assessment and highlight the disadvantages which I came across. Are the principles for assessment really the foundation of good practice?