Diabels Oral Reading Fluency

The baseline data was established using the Fountas & Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System (BAS). This test assesses reading comprehension through the process of students reading a text at the appropriate instructional reading level and answering comprehension questions. This assessment tool measures students' ability for accuracy, self correction, fluency, comprehension, and writing. An overall level score is given through a letter identification, A-Z. For the baseline data purpose the letters A-Z were numbered off 1-26 to give the students' scores an adequate numerical score. The assessment determines whether students exceed expectations, meet expectations, approaches expectations, or does not meet expectation. A third-grade student at the

This has deepened my understanding of the big 5 concepts of literacy (phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension) through understanding what criteria can be used to determinate what is effective developmental for a reader and what needs improvement. The Informal Reading Inventory is one example of this because it allows me to assess word recognition, oral and silent reading, comprehension, and literacy capacity. All of which is valuable information which I can then use as a reading teacher to determine further instructional moves. While I have yet to have a place to fully put these assessment techniques into my full practice as a first year teacher. Learning about how to properly assess these components has better equipped me to think about my students' literacy abilities and further strategize my instructional planning to meet the diversity of their literacy

Informal Reading Inventory (IRI) are diagnostic assessment administered individually to evaluate different aspects of students’ reading. After reading the text, students orally are answering the questions following the text. Teachers take into the consideration additional factors,, such as fluency, students’ prior knowledge, and determine students’ reading levels. This information may to choose appropriate reading material for students, to form reading groups, and to plan future reading instruction taking into the considerations students strengths and needs. According to Chall (1983), the greatest value of IRI is to help educators to diagnose the gaps in the abilities of readers who struggle the most. For teachers, who looking for the better way to address students instructional needs of children, who have reading difficulties, IRI is a very valuable diagnostic tool.

However, there are pros of this assessment. These pros are the DIBELS is designed to measure different areas in early literacy which include, but are not limited to phonemic awareness, fluency, vocabulary, and more. All of these areas should guide instructors on ways to teach reading. Students use each of these areas to read, and understand what is being read. Therefore, this test will show teachers what areas students have mastered in early literacy skills, and what areas need to be focused on. This assessment is of no cost, compared to other exams, teachers can sign up for free accounts and download passages without having to come out of pocket. The DIBELS assessment test are administered individually, which allows for teachers to see if students are struggling in a certain area of reading. (Coulter, Shavin, &, Gichuru, 2009) For example, student Jane Doe needs assistance with comprehension, and Bob Doe needs more help in phonics.

At the middle school level, it is difficult to administer extensive interminable assessments, when you are trying to determine readability for over 100 students. Many middle school teachers rely on the NWEA/MAP assessment and “Standard of Learning” to provide them with their student’s Lexile levels and readability. The problem with using data from the NWEA/MAP assessment and SOL scores is that teachers only have data from the previous year and are unable to assess the factors that contributed to the students testing scores. A quick and easy assessment that can be given the first week of school, which takes 10 minutes or less and shows word recognition as well as readability is the San Diego Quick Assessment.

The steps of Response to Instruction and Intervention are to begin with Universal Screen and Pre meeting prep. This is the point when the classroom teacher will assess the student’s ability in reading. The assessment is brief, easily administered, and will assess the risk level for academics. It will examine the skills of fluency, oral reading, phonemes, segmentation, letter naming, and other reading strategies. Once all the students have been screened the results will be reviewed by a school professionals. There are data management system where the scores are calculated and the students risk level is assessed. If a school district does not have this system available to them, the “core team” will use a spreadsheet and determine the students risk level. Once the risk level has been determined there will be e a core team meeting; this will consist of principal and teachers, reading specialist, literacy coaches, curriculum specialist and a school psychologist. This is the overall group that can make up a

The inventory should be individually administered to students in order to accurately observe student automaticity with the high-frequency word recognition. Elementary students are frequently given this test in order to progress monitor high-frequency word mastery and general factors of fluency.

Reading Fluency Composite: This portion of the test had three sections. In one section, she read actual words as quickly as possible. Next, she read made up words as quickly as possible. Finally, Lisa needed to read the sentence and answer if it was correct or incorrect. Lisa scored below average on each of these tests, which shows she has difficulty in reading quickly, which will result in having difficulty keeping up in the classroom due to the amount and speed of reading that is expected.

In ELED 4444 (Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties), I was assigned by Dr. Morrison to work with a peer to create a diagnostic report based on a semester long tutoring project at Washington Irving Elementary School. To create the report, my partner and I ran pretests (Informal Reading Inventory-Graded Word List, Oral, Silent, and Listening Comprehension Passages, Basic Sight Words and Phrases, Phonics, and the DIBELS mid-year assessment) to see what we needed to work on with the student and then we created lesson plans that addressed the child’s needs. After tutoring the student for eight weeks, we post tested him to gather data on how much he progressed. We used the post-tests: IRI Oral and Silent Reading Comprehension, Basic Sight words and Phrases, Phonics, and the DIBELS assessment

Reading fluency is considered an integral component of the reading process and it has a big presence in the classroom. Its importance became evident since the National Reading Panel (2000) pronounced fluency instruction and assessment an essential and was thus incorporated into the reading First guidelines of No Child Left Behind in 2002 (Shelton, Altwerger, &Jordan, 2009). Reading fluency has been defined in many ways; an outcome of decoding and comprehension, a contributor to both decoding and comprehension, the ability to recognize words rapidly and accurately, the connections

The study that I reviewed for the fluency evidence based practice was conducted in an alternative high school in the Southeast. The students that were involved in the study attended sessions that were mediated by their peers three times a week for 45 minutes. The sessions were held in a study hall type classroom that was structured in that the environment was conducive to helping increase the fluency skills of these struggling readers. This was a focus class that had certain guidelines for being a part of. The students were enrolled in this class if they received a grade level of six or below on the Test of Adult Basic Education assessment. The other requirements for this class were as follows: current reading scores between levels 4.0 to 7.0 as determined by the TOWRE (Test of Word Reading

In this proposed study the researcher looked at techniques that can possibly in-crease fluency, and general academic achievement, among students who are struggling academically. By using existing resources, the school could implement this program without cutting into the schools budget. Throughout the history of the

To begin, there nine students including myself that are in Mrs. Klein’s second period class. Over the year, by working with Mrs. Klein, the class worked really hard. To start off the beginning of the year our Oral Reading Fluency, as a class, our beginning of the year score was 591 correct words per minute. Now we are at 848 correct words per minute an increase of 257 words. So

The words ranged from simple words like "a" to more complex words like "number". For this assessment, I printed the sight words onto bigger cards and I laid them out for J.R. Her job was to read the words that were listed. If she read them correctly and without hesitation then she got it correct. However, if she had to spell out the word or if she hesitated for a long period of time then I marked it wrong because she is supposed to recognize them right away. J.R. did fairly well on this assessment. She was able to recognize 88 sight words out of 100. I recognized that the words that she got wrong were the harder sight words. The second assessment that I completed with J.R. was the spelling inventory assessment. For this assessment, I gave J.R. a simple spelling test. I would say the word to her and include the word in a sentence. As I did this, J.R. wrote the words down. This assessment was given to see if J.R. could hear and write the constants (initial and final), the short vowels, digraphs, blends, and common long vowels that appear in the words that were given. This was one of the assessments that J.R. struggled with. She spelled most of the words wrong and she had trouble identifying digraphs and blends in words. The third assessment that I conducted was the phonemic awareness assessment. This assessment tested skills such as rhyming, phoneme isolation, oral blending, oral segmentation, and

|Dynamic Indicators |A set of procedures and measures for |DIBELS are designed to be short (one minute) fluency |