Diary of Negotiations

Gina Blair represented a competitive-cooperative negotiation strategy which represented a middle ground, both combined in a style which was open minded but assertive. Gina had scheduled the telephone meeting between herself and Daniel Trent; therefore she had more knowledge about what was going to be discussed. As she had initiated the negotiation she had prepared well for the issues concerning her clients. She presented her negotiation in a logical structure, showing that she had prepared all the areas of concern which she intended to address. Her preparation allowed her to identify and prioritise her client’s concerns. She avoided small talk and was very direct, her approach was assertive and she projected confidence. She had a clear understanding of the issues which were of concern to her clients and had proposed

I played Chris Rudolph in this case, and did well in this negotiation by not only focusing on the final price, but also on the extra agreement of letting Lama provided high quality work to our company. When we started the negotiation, I suggested us to divide the total price into two parts, the first one was Market Research fee, and the second one was the Lama-Lee’s charge. After some initial discussion, I realized the Market Research fee was hard to negotiate, so I planed to put most of my effort on Lama-Lee’s fee.

This paper presents my reflections on the Negotiations: Strategy and practice coursework in the MBA program at Said Business School, University of Oxford. My paper will present various reflections on different themes of negotiation simulation undertaken by me during the course. This course has allowed investigating and reflecting on key drivers of negotiation techniques for me. I have learned that transparency and coalition are the core tenet of negotiation for me. For the purpose of this reflective exercise, I will conduct a comparative analysis of the process, dynamics and outcomes based on the themes such as negotiation styles, bargaining zones, power, emotion, coalitions, value claiming vs value creation etc. for the below-mentioned simulations:

Negotiation is a fundamental form of dispute resolution involving two or more parties (Michelle, M.2003). Negotiations can also take place in order to avoid any future disputes. It can be either an interpersonal or inter-group process. Negotiations can occur at international or corporate level and also at a personal level. Negotiations often involve give and take acknowledging that there is interdependence between the disputants to some extent to achieve the goal. This means that negotiations only arise when the goals cannot be achieved independently (Lewicki and Saunders et al., 1997). Interdependence means the both parties can influence the outcome for the other party and vice versa. The negotiations can be win-lose or win-win in nature.

Season 2 was the #1 television series in the p-12-34 demo for summer 2010 and posted increasing growth every week

The process to start with was quite integrative with both sides laying out their priorities and what their limitation were. However, in between we reached an impasse with both sides not agreeing with each other. We set the anchor at 16,000 and then Anna came back with a bid of 65K plus 5% of gate. We said that was too high and said that was way off industry norms. We countered with 19 K. She said the base was too low, that was not possible and he wanted us to counter bid against ourselves, which we did not. She offered 55K + 5 % of gate. We said we could do 24k but no gate collection. She said 45 K + 5% of the gate. We offered him 26 K and at this point the negotiation kind of stalled. The Opera really wanted Sally for the role and Sally really needed a job as she was

In Energetics meets Generex negotiation, I was acting as a Chief Operating Officer (COO) for Energetics Corporation and my opponent and my classmate Chace Eskam was acting as a COO of Generex Corporation. In this deal, as a COO I was supposed to sell the Wind energy division of the Energetics to Generex. Energetics Corporation was in desperate need of cash due to bankruptcy. Another hurdle was that I could not sell three different locations of Wind plants individually. My company needed cash within three months with no additional terms added to this deal. My another best alternative was to sell all the assets of Wind Energy division to generate some cash if deal with Generex fails in this negotiation. Our negotiation went on for 15-20 minutes during class time and deal was set in $247 millions. My opponent Chace was very tough in this negotiation to deal. He was very prepared with facts and numbers before he came to the table. My opponent asked me lot questions such as the depreciation of the property, equipment’s life, taxes etc. After having lot of discussion we ultimately came to the conclusion that Generex will pay Energetics $247 million right away in cash to purchase Wind Energy division from Energetics.

1. How did you plan for the negotiation? Explain how you decided on a strategy?

For the Texoil negotiation, I was in the role of the Service Station Owner. As such, my main objective was to sell the station and get the best possible agreement. My BATNA was $400,000, which represented an offer from British Petroleum and my resistance point was $413,000 after tax, which represented the cost of my trip. My target was $488,000, which included an additional $75,000 to help tie me over until I found a job upon my return. This resistance point represents a purely financial alternative. However, there were several other criteria or interests other than strictly financial which could have been satisfied through non-financial means. My underlying interest or reason for selling the station was

The property, according to Alexander, was aesthetically desirable and had profit potential; additionally the asking price of $350,000 was within his price range. Some renovation on the property was needed and the cost approximates $165,000 according to a contractor. After preparing an income and expense statement, Alexander projected a cash flow before financing of $61,510, without any allowance for the work he would do himself. He also planned to live in the top floor apartment with his wife “rent free”, while making money by managing and renting. With time of the essence, he had to act fast and take the property off the market before a potential investor got ahead of him.

B. Calculate the relevant cost of the project for Flower. What is the lowest amount the firm should accept for the contact? Explain.

It should be noted that an income approach could have also been used. Using a determined market discount rate of 6% and current year revenue of $3,028,000 at a four year discounted rate, the value would have been $12,040,548. Because adequate market information was available to make a more accurate estimate of the fair value, this is the estimate that was chosen.

According to the calculation of Laflin in year five, NOI is $216,784. At a 10% cap rate the property is worth $2,167,840. My adjusted calculation yields a valuation

Pilgrim was willing to lease back the 100,000 SF it occupied for revenue of $2,600,000. In exhibit one; we have an expense break down of expense per sf. In total $11.25 psf in

Looking at the parties involved in the negotiation, it was clear that each party would have agendas that would be in conflict with each other. For instance, the other ports in the region would like the highest compensation possible while Harborco would like the lowest compensation. Additionally, each party would also have a minimum threshold score that they would need from each outcome before they would support the project. Therefore, it is clear that this is an integrative negotiation which requires joint problem solving to achieve