From the tzars to the Slavophiles to the Soviet Union it is a common question if Russia has ever had true nationalism. They certainly had nothing of the sort prior to the revolution. They lacked many key factors like industrialization and a population ready to move beyond archaic religious beliefs. The Slavophiles I would also assert laid the foundation for Russian nationalism. They rejected the west and set the example for a truly Russian identity. As for the Soviet Era, I would argue that it was nationalism, but very complicated nationalism. Nationalism with a small part monarchy as well. However, it was certainly developing during the Soviet Era. Since the wall has come down many scholars are now studying the subject. One thing is definite:
Nationalism can be described as an extreme patriotic feeling towards one’s country. This idea was spread all around the globe around the time of WWI because the European powers had just entered into a time of competitive colonization to stay in collective power over one another. Document 5 shows the presence of nationalism in some nationalistic poems and songs recited in the European nations of Russia and Scotland. In the Russian national anthem, it says, “God save the noble Tsar! Long may he live, in power, In happiness, In peace to reign! Dread of his enemies, Faith’s sure defender, God save the Tsar!” Nationalism is most prominent in this anthem in the line, “Dread of his enemies.” It is saying that the Tsar puts fear into the souls of his enemies because of his power; and because this is a patriotic anthem, one may assume that the Russians were proud to recite this line and remain in a country that is feared by its enemies. The other piece in Document 5 is written by a Scottish poet, and the source of the document informs readers that it is the unofficial national anthem of Great Britain. It is full of a nationalist tone and spirit. The song’s second verse says this, “The nations not so blest as thee, Shall in their turn to tyrants fall; While thou shalt flourish great and free, The dread and envy of them all.” The author of these words thought of Great Britain as superior to all of the other nations! Document 6
Nationalism is having pride in your country or nation. People show pride in their country or nation by celebrating their country’s national holidays and/or fighting for your country in the armed forces. For example, the American Revolution and the Latin American Revolution are examples
Nationalism is the love of country and willingness to sacrifice for it. Socialism is a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the
Kappeler’s argument essentially is that Russia was a multiethnic and multicultural empire until 1991. He contends that because it did not expand overseas, but expanded outward into contested regions and weaker states, it was not a colonial empire however. One of the main objectives he has is to see the Russian and Soviet Empires as multiethnic, something he contends most of the historiography has failed to do. By discussing the different regions of the empire individually, he does add a less homogeneous perspective on the Russian Imperial and Soviet Eras. He contends the Russian Empire continued and expanded starting in the 16th century.
Nationalism was formed with the idea that a nation is made up of people who are joined together by common language, customs, cultures and history. It held the belief that one should be loyal to the people of their nation, not a king or empire. Nationalists believed that people of a single nationality should unite under a single government. The concept of Nationalism emerged in the French Revolution and was spread to the rest of Europe by Napoleon’s conquests.
Nationalism, according to Merriam-Webster, is the “loyalty and devotion to a nation” to the point that “one nation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations or supranational groups.” However, there are a couple of other national tendencies that had an impact on world history. Nationalism was the most important and impactful ideology during the early twentieth century Europe. Nevertheless, there was also the conservatism movement during the nineteenth century that had influence over Europe for years.
However, nationalism does not have one single definition, its meaning has evolved as society changes and modernises. Nationalism can “...refer to any behaviour designed to restore, maintain, or advance public images of that national community” (Gries, 2005:9). By the mid-1960s there were two main proposals to understanding nationalism. “In the first, nationalism was an aspect of national history, a sentiment associated with the nation...In the second approach, nationalism was a modern, irrational doctrine which could acquire sufficient power...to generate nationalists sentiments and even nation states” (Gellner, 2008:xx). Nationalism is defined differently by different schools of thought and theorists.
Nationalism inspires a pride within a group of people that ignites change and strengthens unity. It is what keeps heritages and cultures of nations alive. But what happens when the people advocating Nationalism are trapped within a nation in which they do not desire to be? The Pan-Slavic movement in Eastern Europe in the early 20th Century created a tension between Austria-Hungary and Serbia that culminated in
Nationalism, a political or social philosophy in which the prosperity of a nation-state as an existence is considered supreme or more important than anything else. The primary duty and loyalty should be toward the nation-state. The love for one's country often reflected dominance and power as people were able to unite toward common good. Furthermore, republic governments were reestablished a result of Nationalism.
The concept of nationalism is in essence an odd organization that has had significant impacts in world history through shaping the political and social aspects of the society. As an important aspect in the development of the society, the concept of nationalism has basically been analyzed based on its impact on the emergence of nation-states across the globe. In most cases, these analyses have been conducted to determine the influence of nationalism on imperial breakdown i.e. the dissolution of empires. While the actual extent of the impact of nationalism on the imperial breakdown is uncertain, this concept has played a major role in the dissolution of empires. Generally, the transition to nationalism has contributed to significant effects in world history through shaping the political and social aspects of the society.
Soviet Union: an uprising of the humbled victors, unified with a newfound sense of nationalism,
Nationalism was coined back in the 1770’s it has a major role in the shaping many nations throughout the world. Nationalism has many positive and negative aspects to it. Nationalism has the strength to unify people despite their classes. It also has the ability to united people to lead movements against oppressive governments. There is a downside Nationalism can as method to evoke fear. The biggest negative is that most nationalism movement’s inevitably led to some form of conflict. Nationalism is a dangerous movement that can lead to oppression of opposition groups and lead to conflicts.
The rise of nationalism occurred during the French Revolution with the abdication of the French monarch, France established the world’s first “nation-state”, and its people defined themselves as French (Misha 20). With the fall
Nationalism – A citizen’s passionate feeling of devotion and pride for their country. Nationalism usually suggests that a nation’s people believe themselves, their ideals, and their goals to be superior to those of other nations. Many citizens felt a rise in nationalism due to competition among European nations for large empires.
Webster's dictionary defines nationalism as a loyalty and devotion to a nation; especially : a sense of national consciousness exalting one nation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations or supranational groups. Our lands peoples were quick to join in on the battle, he fine line between white and native was diminished, and the men bonded as one to defeat Germany. Canadian troupes, we’re bound not just by force but by the will of pride when called to fight for Britain in 1917; Prime Minister Borden was pressured into sending them into battle but continued with his promise through and through. As the conflict came towards it’s ending it was found that Canada had rightfully earned a title powerful and meaningful title. Our Canadian soldiers demonstrated