Did Technology and Strategy Affect the Outcome of World War Ii

The atomic bombs, which were dropped in different areas of Japan, wiped out around 90% of each city. The bombing of Hiroshima immediately killed 70,000 people. The second bombing, located in Nagaski, killed an estimated 40,000 people. The dropping of these atomic bombs resulted in Japan surrendering. Japan understood how influential and destructive these bombs were. After these events took place, people soon began to realize how serious and deadly nuclear weapons really are. Not only are they extremely destructive, but they can end a war fast and easy. They also leave radiation after they are dropped which causes even more damage and even more people

The two war technology I picked to win the war are submarines and jet-propelled airplanes. Submarines are very effiecent, fast and could attack anytime. First, submarines would attack at night to attack few of the enemies ships and during the day, they would attack and take out the eniemies trying to cross the sea with their ships. Secondly, jet-propelled airplanes would attack on air, using fighter planes can bomb the enemy's bombers plane first and bomber plane take out armed vechicles.

The vast differences in technology affected both sides, and were both beneficial and detrimental. The Germans possessed more advanced technology and weapons than the Soviets, such as the MP40. According to Staff Writer on MilitaryFactory.com, the MP40 came about when the Germans realized that their previous submachine gun, the MP43, was “too much for war time production,” and a newer, more effective model was needed. The MP40 improved its predecessor’s original model, with its small size, decreased jamming incidents, and the revolutionary folding stock. This would become the “definitive submachine gun for the German Army” (Writer).

During World War II there were many battles that took place. One particular known battle was the “Battle of the Bulge” also known as the battle of Ardennes, from December 16th, 1944 to January 16th, 1945. It was the Last major German offense on the Western Front during WWII, and it was a futile attempt to push the Allies back from German home territory. This name was given by Winston Churchill, a description of the resistance he mistakenly supposed was being offered to the Germans’ breakthrough in that are before the Anglo-French collapse. The word Bulge denotes to the wedge that the Germans drove into Allied lines. This informative research of the Battle of the Bulge, focuses on the Field Artillery branch, its immense efforts in the battle, as well how as some advances in the branch; i.e. proximity fuse. This battle is also a great example to why field artillery is the “king of battle”.

The development of the allied military strategy in World War II (WWII) presented challenges for the U.S. and Great Britain as they worked together to defeat the Axis powers. First, this paper will review the environment at the time of WWII when Admiral Stark penned the “Plan Dog” memorandum and MAJ Wedemeyer’s War Defense Team put together the “Victory Plan”. Next, it will look at the advantages and disadvantages of coalition operations with supporting examples. Then, a review of two major meetings between U.S. and Great Britain will identify what strategic decisions were made and the effects they have on the war. Finally, this paper will explore the foundations of strategy (Clausewitz and Sun Tzu) by which the allied forces used and

The Battle of the Bulge, known as the Ardennes Offensive, was the largest battle fought on the Western Front in Europe during World War II and the largest battle ever fought by the U.S. Army. The battle was Hitler’s last major battle in World War II; an attempt to push the Allied front line west from northern France to northwestern Belgium. Hitler attempted to split the Allies in two in their drives toward Germany and destroy the ability to supply themselves (Weintraub, 2007). The Germans lost so many troops and equipment that they could not launch another attack on the Allied forces. The Battle of the Bulge is most significant in that it ruined the German army. Essentially, the Battle of the Bulge brought about the end of World War II (Weintraub, 2007). During the Battle of the Bulge, the American Artillery units had been equipped with new American weapons. All the divisions’ Artillery was motorized after the discovery of a defect found on the French Artillery Gun that the Americans used during World War I. The U.S. Army managed to replace all its World War I artillery pieces with the new, modernized howitzers and convert from horse-drawn to motorized artillery. The American artillery units were equipped with M105mm, M155mm and M155mm self-propelled Howitzers and with proximity fuzes, the most notable advances

iii. The advancement in science saw the war become sophisticated as each side tried to outwit the other in tact and equipment.

Leading into the Fall of 1914, tactics on both sides of the line involved the rapid mobilization, maneuver and envelopment of the opposing side.10 Pre-1914 doctrine took little into account the effects of emerging new technology and their impact on both defensive and offensive operations. This disconnect between doctrine and technology contributed to the failure of early offensive operations in the Fall of 1914 and resulted in staggering casualties.11 Both sides developed doctrine that took into effect the unique terrain and technology that had been developed prior and during World War I. However by the end of the war, a combination of flexibility, decentralized control, and counterattack at every echelon made the German defensive system the most effective.12 This “elastic defense” had three unique characteristics; dedicated counter-attack force at all levels, decentralized command and control, fluid defensive belts and integrated artillery support at the Division level. Under this new doctrine, Corps headquarters had the role sustaining subordinate units, but not directing their actions during battle.13 This defense-in-depth and the lessons learned during the Verdun battles of 1918 were so successful that British forces adopted many of the German tactics with a special emphasis on their counterattack capability.10 Utilizing the new doctrine, by August 1918, Germany had made substantial gains, however had

One of the most recognized technologic advancements in plans during world war one and two waqs the blitzberg plan. The World War Two era was a time of change. There were many technological advancements during this time. These advances can be categorized into three categories. They are weapon advances, vehicle advances, and strategic advances. This technology would change the face of war forever.

The Battle of Fort Eben Emael saw the world’s first glider-borne assault as well as the first combat use of hollow charge explosives. Implementing these new technologies with meticulous planning and methodical training, a much smaller German force was able to defeat the strongest

Germany was successful early in World War II because of the strategy and the main military tactic of blitzkrieg. This tactic was created disorganization among Germany enemy forces through the use of locally concentrated firepower and mobile force. This brings successful in military campaigns by preserving human lives and limits expenditure of large guns that are used to shoot over a great distance. German forces tried out this tactic strategies “blitzkrieg” over Poland in 1939. They tried out before the successful placement of the tactic with the invasion of Netherlands, France, and Belgium in 1940. German use this tactic during the North African campaign of WWII in European operation.

American army officer Omar Bradley once said,“If we continue to develop our technology without wisdom or prudence, our servant may prove to be our executioner.” The meaning of this quote lies in the destruction and devastation of humanity and geography during war. If we do not stop advancing in ways of killing and causing suffering, we will soon face the consequences of these technologies. Throughout World War I and World War II, there was a ginormous technological boom in which countries were competing to invent new weapons or vehicles used in warfare. Specifically, World War I could be blamed for the start of the creating of new technologies used in warfare even today. These technologies were often invented or created during World War I,

Blitzkrieg in a literal sense means “lightning war” meaning that they would use speed and confusion to upset the enemy forces. Rommel is credited as being the one who perfected the art of war known as Blitzkrieg and for good reasons. It’s believed that Rommel and Guderian were told under the command of Hitler to disobey their superiors and to push the front, leaving their flanking forces behind them to create confusion and surprise for the enemy. Rommel used this method of

There were many factors that affected the outcome of World War Two. Some of these were how many tanks you had, how powerful your tanks were, and how well they were built. The Allies had the most tanks in the war and this was one of the main things that helped them win. The Germans had the most powerful tanks in the war, but the allies out numbered them. The Allies using light and medium tanks in big groups against the Germans powerful tanks was the main thing that helped them win World War Two.

This was mainly the reason why Germany poured massive funding and manpower into the further development of this technology and was able to harness the success earlier. Germany’s jet fighters and jet bombers were the most feared air craft on the battlefield as the fighter jet was able to gun down on average five Allied fighter planes before being shot down. Rapid increases in the technologies of war and destructiveness like these are what made war so violent and bloodshed during the turn of the century. The scale that World War Two was fought on was much larger than that of the wars before the dawn of civilization. During this time, war was considered small scale as it was often between two small groups and was not recognized by any government or authority as there was none at the time. It wasn’t until the rise of state five thousand years ago that military activity started to happen all over the globe. The very first wars were fought with hand to hand combat often with improvised melee peripherals designed to injure the victim severely such as a spear. This was known as ancient warfare. Medieval warfare lasted from the beginning of the 5th century until the 15th century. The middle ages saw large cultural, social, and technological developments which changed the way war was fought into a more strategic and thought out procedure versus ancient warfare where there was rarely any strategy involved and armies