Did The Constitution Establish A Just Government?

Madison’s primary focus throughout the beginning of this paper is factions. He holds a deep disdain for them as he thinks that they solely focus on themselves, while hurting other Americans, which is evident in this quote, (“…united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the

In “Federalist #10”, Madison describes the dangerous effects that factions can have on Republican government and on its people. Madison defines a faction as a group of citizens who unite under a shared cause, and work against other groups in order to achieve their means. Their means of achieving their goals may achieve adverse effects upon the rights of other citizens. Put in more modern terms, a faction could be reasonably compared to a special-interest group. The sort of faction that most endangers the liberty inherent in United States society are factions that contain a majority of the whole. The weakness of a popular government is its susceptibility to the effects of factions. However, a well-constructed Union provides numerous

It is generally understood that the United States is built upon the principles of democracy, in which the majority consensus of the citizens helps to define the shape of issues or elections. However, in assuming that the Constitution - the document upon which such practices are founded – is inherently democratic is only partially accurate. Indeed, it has been frequently argued that the U. S. Constitution is representative of the rule of law from a federation as opposed to a pure democracy; in a federation, elections occur among the majority of the citizenry but this process results in elected officials who then determine the direction of the country. In short, a federation

The United States would lose its name and stand divided if the Constitution did not bring the thirteen colonies into one body. Within this governing body, fears arise from the difficulty of controlling power in a central government, while still trying to keep unity between the states. Understanding that the United States was formed based on the people’s irritation with the corruption of the control of power in England, the Constitution reassured the people that their freedoms were going to be kept, but it required their trust. The founders of the United States Constitution established a just government through encompassing equal representation, with the people as the foundation, and protecting the injustices that could arise with the misuse of power.

The ability to unify a nation in a liberal democracy and work towards obtaining a given objective is incredibly difficult when everyone’s opinion is supposed to be valued. However it’s not just valuing everyone’s opinion that can cause concern, but the fact that people are allowed to act on their opinions, no matter how radical or crazy they are to the majority of the population. This allows for dissenting opinions against the general will to rise up and hold seats within the legislature; therefore, legitimizing their claims by thrusting them into the public spotlight. This can be both good and bad and it was explored in-depth by James Madison in The Federalist Papers. In his work he states the obvious concerns factions can have on a society

When our founding fathers came together to construct a Constitution that would establish a government that could serve the people, they outlined their overall goals of this Constitution within the Preamble. The first task listed in this famous preliminary statement is to “establish Justice.” The position of this objective within the Constitution demonstrates just how significant Justice is to a government. Justice is a principle that demands equality for all in their opportunity, rights, and in a court of law. A just government would ensure minority rights and limit its power so that it cannot become too powerful. However, our Constitution does not do these things to the extent that it could be considered just. The original document denied a minority group equality by directly supporting slavery, allowed congress nearly unlimited power through the necessary and proper clause, and contains the Supreme Court, an institution that goes against the spirit of democracy. Therefore, the Constitution did not establish a just government.

The constitution is a plan of government that lasted for over 200 years, it was a strong foundation that had room for flexibility. It was written in May of 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to replace the Articles of Confederation, the former plan of U.S government. Tyranny is the control of all power by one person or group. The colonists believed that King hb

In this DBQ The following question to be answered is how did the constitution guard against tyranny. To answer that question, I have to read the following documents A, B, C & D. After that proceed to cite textual evidence while evaluating the questions. First, I had to answer the background questions. My thesis statement is that they guarded tyrannies from the constitution by using federalism & framers. In Philadelphia may 1787 the constitution was written. During that time two of the weaknesses of the articles of confederation were no chief executive & no court system. James

Nearly the late year of 1787, the U.S. Constitution was established, stating the basal laws and fundamental principles that the United States would be governed by. Many philosophers and political thinkers furnished a great comprehension for the modern day structures that are very active today. Our Founding Fathers created a system which divides different acts of government into the legislature, executive, and judicial branches. Following in the form of the Separation of Powers, the checks and balances system ensures that political power isn’t contributing to any individual or group that enables them to gain an abundant amount of power. For the instance of this, “the Constitution provides a method for change, as the Founders created it this

In 1787, the constitution gave the country a federal system to be used as a guide. Before this there was only one way the government followed and it was not working. Changed needed to happen and the current way, as mentioned earlier, was failing. By holding the government accountable in this new form, it offered equal opportunity and liberty for American citizens.

The Federalist Papers Number 10 is written by James Madison and explains the necessity of the Constitution to protect our country from factions. A faction is “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent aggregate interests of the community (Publius, 72).” Publius states that there are two ways to get rid of factions. The first way to eliminate a faction is to take the Liberty away from all of the people in the faction. The other way to cure a faction is to give everyone the same opinion. Both of this solutions are not possible

The Framer’s notion of a republic, or democratic republic form of government, rested on the necessity to limit the formation and success of factions. Yet, as Dahl argued, the irony of Madison’s aversions to factions is that, not long after the ratification of the

The enactment of the Constitution fabricated the United States’ identity. Through the ratification process dynamic factions developed and created the initial formation of political parties. The establishment of both the Federalist and anti-federalist groups contributed key components in the formation of the present day system of government. While the Federalists illuminated national awareness and necessity, the anti-federalists assured the protection of individual rights and liberties. To this day, these fundamental ideologies outline the basic debate individuals discuss throughout the United States. As a democratic republic, the initiation of participation and collaboration through

Correspondingly, the constitution was written during the American revolution to limits the national government's power and keep the general population free. Since the country has been founded under beliefs of freedom, it is natural for them to value the right to own an arm if they want to. Also, the revolution was mainly citizens of the colony bearing arms and fighting against the English soldiers. When they became their own country, Americans feared to be limited once more by the government if it had too much power (DeBell 1). On the contrary, Japan has an history of banning multiple arms. In 1588, the emperor banned all swords and fire-arms to the general population. Since citizens could not use any firearms or sword, they had to find a

The one problem is that the constitution has no statements regarding the dangers that factions pose to us as a nation despite all the improvements that have been made to the democratic system.