Diet All Proved Effective At Producing Weight Loss

When reading about some of the diet I was familiar with, I began speaking to my 50 year old aunt, whom revealed that she had struggle with dieting most of her adult life. After making a complete list of the diets she has tried, some common factors were present. In every diet there are many risk factors that could possibly occur, such as relapse. In the quote “Eat less fat and you will be less fat” is the main reason the diets that most people try don’t work because most nutritional value is lost this book gives you the truth about myths and misconceptions that many diet

The DRI recommends that I consume a minimum of 25 grams of fiber daily. My current intake of dietary fiber falls short of meeting my recommended amount. Fiber is important in a healthy diet. It is beneficial in maintaining good digestive health and with prevention of diseases, including colon and rectal cancer. Adequate amounts of fiber also decrease the risk of heart disease by lowering the amount of LDL cholesterol within the blood.

In today’s growing world, fad diets seem to be all the rage. As obesity rates are increasing more and more each year with 1/3 of the population overweight and 1/3 of the population obese, many people are trying everything that they can to lose weight. With people in our nation because too busy to exercise, too busy to make healthy meals, and healthy foods being too expensive, many people turn to these fad diets to help control their weight or help them lose their weight. One of the most known fad diet is the Weight Watchers program. The purpose of this study is to find out using both creditable and not so creditable sources if this fad diet actually works.

The Medical and sports nutrition establishment are horrified by the concept of low carbohydrate and ketogenic diets. While studies are being released almost daily proving the superiority of low carb diets for fat loss, the medical establishment warns against trying them as the long term health risks are "unknown". Apparently it is a case of 'better the devil you know than the devil you don 't '.

The three macronutrients are carbohydrates, protein, and fat (McKinley Health Center, 2008). It is important to that macronutrient intake be within the recommended intake range. Having a diet that consists of too much or too little of a macronutrient could be harmful to the body. If you eat too many macronutrients, you could gain fat and if you eat too little macronutrients you could lose healthy fat, which would cause the body to break down. If you consistently eat too little protein, carbohydrates, or lipids, the body would be malnourished, which could have devastating effects on your health.

The information presented is subjective and opinionated statements. Information is based on Somers beliefs and approach to losing weight and dieting. There is no scientific evidence to support the weight loss combination.

In the article, Fiber Free-for-All: Not All Fibers Are Equal, it discusses what individuals must know about fiber and where to get the types of fiber that count. According to the National Academy of Sciences, women need 25 grams of fiber and men need 38 grams a day. However, older people need less fiber because they need less calories as well: “The advice is to get 14 grams of fiber per 1,000 calories, and older people need fewer calories” (Thomas Wolever). Based on studies, people that consume the most fiber from cereals, breads, and other grains has a lower risk of heart disease. Additionally, there are two types of fiber. Soluble and insoluble. Fruits, vegetables, and grains have both soluble and insoluble fiber, but insoluble fiber is not broken down by gastrointestinal enzymes. A few grains, like oats and barley, have more soluble fibers, which can be broken down

fad-diets fail to live up to their promises of drastic and immediate results, locavorism is doomed

Aphramor, L. (2010, July). Validity of claims made in weight management research: a narrative review of dietetic articles. Nutrition Journal, 9().

In the journal review written by Lopes and Fayh, obese individuals assess the effects of 5% of diet only or diet and exercise. There were a study that was conducted in a clinical setting. There were forty-eight participants who were dieting only, and there were forty-eight participants who dieting and exercising only. The study was conducted until 5% of the body weight was lost. The participants in 79.6 days for the diet only group and 69.6 days in the diet and exercise group diminish significantly in their weight and cholesterol ( Lopes & Fayh, 2013, p.1443).

In the article “Myths of weight loss are plentiful” researchers explain their thoughts and presumptions on the many studies down towards the effects of weight loss. Many doctors and directors of highly rated medical schools explain that they don’t see how some studies could even make a case on how certain programs and pills cause weight loss. For example, one of the studies done was the association of people who eat breakfast everyday to those who do not. Many of the people who did eat breakfast were shown to be thinner than those who did not,

During the three days of documented intake, my fiber consumption was only 24.3% of the daily recommendation. Fiber helps promote proper digestive functions, helps lower cholesterol, and helps in lowering the risk of diabetes and heart disease. My intake was too low based on the recommended consumption, and according to the data, I should eat more foods that are rich in fiber. These can be insoluble fiber sources like wheat bran and nuts or soluble fiber sources like oats, beans, and apples. The only foods that provided fiber in my meals were the bagels.

They also found that low-carbohydrate diet has more favourable improvement in some factors of coronary heart disease, such as serum triglycerides and serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, but not on others, such as blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and insulin sensitivity (Foster et al., 2003). The strength of this research is that it comprises of various coronary heart disease risks. This result however may not be reliable as the sample is small and the attrition level is forty-three per-cent. As subjects used were obese individuals that had no serious health disease, their findings cannot be generalised for overweight and obese individuals with serious health disease.

A common dietetic strategy for reducing energy intake while still maintaining nutritional adequacy is to replace full-fat dairy products with reduced-fat varieties. The purpose of this study was to examine the dietary outcomes of this strategy in the context of weight loss by comparing the amount, type, and nutrient contribution of dairy products consumed by overweight individuals participating in a weight-loss trial. A secondary aim was to determine whether individuals complied with a recommended intake of reduced-fat dairy product based on individual requirements. The researchers hypothesized that the intake of fat and energy from dairy products would decrease, and a greater number of individuals would meet the recommended number of diary product servings after 3 months of participation in the weight-loss trial.

The media article also seems to be misleading because it states that the diet helped those at risk for heart disease even if they could not lose weight. To a person who has not read the PREDIMED trial or does not have a good background in biology, this can be easily misinterpreted that it is okay to be overweight. In fact, research shows that obesity is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases.2,7 Therefore, people who are at risk of developing cardiovascular disease should also give importance to a good diet as well as a healthy lifestyle and weight management. Other risk factors should also be eliminated in order to successfully improve cardiovascular health. The media article also mentions the primary endpoints that were used in the trial. Kolata states that the researchers in the PREDIMED trial did not look at risk factors such as cholesterol, hypertension, and weight.6 Even though the researchers did not measure these risk factors at the primary endpoint, they did fill out a baseline questionnaire prior to participant enrollment relating to these risk factors. The hazard ratios were also adjusted for these risk factors twice.3 The media article also puts an emphasis on what should be