preview

Difference Between 'A Comparison Of Crane's And'

Decent Essays
Open Document

The difference between Crane’s novel and other books like it is that in many ways, it’s unconventional and doesn’t tell a story quite like any other book. Barely anything about where the battles took place are described throughout the book, simply giving the reader the information that there were 2 opposing sides that were or were not in battle. Another distinction is how Crane portrays the character’s place in all of this. Instead of feeding the reader information that may have been learned or assumed about the opposing side, portraying them as “the bad guys,” or even depicting his fellow soldiers as people who were fighting for a righteous cause. Both sides were seemingly just ordered to fight each other because of the color of their uniform. Crane develops Henry as a character throughout the novel in no specific way, where he makes direct transitions from a cowardly soldier forced to fight all the way into him becoming a more mature and courageous person that is slowly forged into over the course of the book. Even so, not all questions that arise throughout the story are answered throughout the novel, giving …show more content…

Although the descriptions are still specific, and give plenty of detail about different parts of the battle, Crane’s passages are written through a first person perspective, allowing for Crane to describe vividly the details of battles. Not only could he craft precise details, he also greatly describes the way that Henry phycologically perceives his surroundings and the events taking place before him. Though Pleasonton does a good job at creating a chaotic atmosphere, Crane’s fleshed out character that we’ve been reading about from his point of view for previously 4 chapters has finally gotten into battle, and struggles among his fellow soldiers describing how many fought frantically for their lives, and how others fled screaming from

Get Access