Difference Between Congress And Us Congress

The main breaking point between the President and Congress was in the Vietnam war. This war sparked a debate on who has the right to declare war, and who has the right to only send advisory troops. Only Congress has the right to declare war, the President can only send advisory troops to other countries. This is a very controversial topic because many people think that the President can declare war, but they have to ask the Congress first. Another convincing reason on why Congress is more powerful that the President is the fact that Congress can make laws and the President has no say. Laws are the outline of America, and they are the only thing keeping crime from all streets in all states across America. Those are only two reasons why Congress is more important to America than the President. All of these powers are stated in Article 1 of the Constitution and the powers of the President are listed in Article 2 of the Constitution. Some people still disagree, though, they think that the President has more rights than

The relationship between the president and Congress has changed drastically in the past two hundred years. The framers of the constitution did not want an executive power in charge of the whole country in fear of it turning into a monarchy. They knew they needed a leader for America though. The framers did not want political parties. “Political parties established after Washington left the presidency” (Mandate). The relationship between Congress and the president changed in a very visible way. In the past, the president would meet to discuss issues with Congress, but that is not how it is today. Also the president would have to go through congress to pass a bill or an amendment, but presidents found a way around going through congress. The president can sign a bill without congress’s approval. For example, president Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln wanted to pass an amendment that would end slavery but Congress said no. Lincoln then did what the people wanted and signed the emancipation proclamation anyways to end slavery. Also known as the thirteenth amendment. Some presidents even put the people in power.

The United States Congress is made up of two chambers the House of Representatives and the Senate. All together there are 485 congress people that come together to alter current laws or suggest new legislation. They are required to meet once per year on January 3 by the US Constitution, but they come together much more often than that. Their sessions can last months if the topic is very controversial. US legislation is slow and at times painfully inefficient. In order to make new legislation, the Congress has to go through a long process of getting a majority in the house as well as the Senate, and even after all that the President still has to approve of the bill in question. An example of this is the Healthcare bill that Barack Obama successfully passed in during his first term as President. He had to fight in order to get the reform passed, persuade the members of Congress that his bill should even be considered, and after all that the Supreme Court almost ruled that the legislation was unconstitutional. The US Congress is a headache on its best day. The system is set up to create gridlock and for the past 200 years it has works.

greatly. While that in the U.S constitution the only person in the executive branch is the

Congress not only creates the laws, but they even overview how are they executed. The executive branch’s job is to implement the laws created by congress. Congress makes sure the laws they have made are being administered correctly. In that sense the executive branch is always under the consent of the legislative

The United States has a written constitution whereas the Great Britain does not. While the Constitution is impossible to change in any significant respect, the Great Britain various Acts of Parliament can be changed by a majority vote of the legislature. The American constitution separate the power between the executive, the legislature and the judiciary, but the British political system does not have official separation of powers. Actually, in Great Britain, one person is actually a member of all three arms of government.

Business is the practice of making ones living by engaging in commerce and for ethics it’s the branch of knowledge that deals with moral principles. So, lets get started, the way that the government has structured commerce(means business/birth certicate is traded by commerce) there is no such thing as business ethics, especially when you count out the good businesses. The congress/government operates and created this system off the term “necessaries.” This system is bankrupt and has been for quite some time now.The U.S. is a corporation that is bankrupt after they forfeit over everything, didn’t have anything else, but only use us(birth certicate) as collateral. There are two systems going on, one private, the other public. They are hiding

For instance, the United States has a constitution which is the supreme law of the land, whereas, the United Kingdom has provisions that are in the Acts of Parliament. Secondly, the United States has a separation of powers in regards to the judiciary, legislature, and executive – the United Kingdom has not separation essentially making one person a member of all three arms. Thirdly, the United States has a presidential system where a president is elected and the United Kingdom system is a parliamentary system with the Prime Minister being in office as long as a majority of votes are cast in the House of Commons maintaining his power.

The legislature in the U.S. and the U.K. differ in some pretty important ways. First, in regards to Parliament, the entire legislature is dissolved at least once every five years, and new elections are held for every seat. In the United States, Representatives and Senators are elected based on term lengths instead. Second, in the UK, the House of Commons is mostly the only house in Parliament that gets elected directly by the people. This is different from Congress because, in the US, both the House and the Senate are elected. The Legislative process itself also differs markedly between Congress and Parliament. In the U.S, legislation must pass in the same form through both houses of Congress before it can be sent to the President's desk. Either

The difference seems small, but it ends up making a world of difference. The US prides itself on separation of powers the legislature makes the laws, and the executive executes them. They provide checks and balances on each other, ensuring that neither one gets too powerful.

The government of the United States takes pride in its separation of power, keeping all branches of government at an equal plane. While there are several forms of parliamentary governments, just as there are different flavors of democratic and republican governments, the key is that in a parliament the head of state is typically a different person from the head of government (The United Kingdom, 2012). In many parliaments the head of state is a monarch while the head of state is an elected official (The United Kingdom, 2012). The benefit of this system is that it takes the work of running the country’s internal affairs off the shoulders of typically the oligarch and places it on a body of elected representatives much like in the United States. The head of state may retain powers or slip into a more symbolic role depending on the type of parliamentary system in

The American executive and legislative are somewhat a contradiction to the parliamentary system of Great Britain in terms of relationship; although the executive may have a similar goal of wanting to be the most effective, as well as seeking to get rational control of the executive branch for taking control of government. (Moe, T. 1994 Pg. 178) However, in terms of the legislative side of both governments, it can be argued that the structure varies, with Britain having a system where the legislative and the executive almost work together. Whereas, in America the executive and legislative have the power to compete against each another, therefore some say there is a negative relationship between the two government branches.

The United States is a democracy. This means that power belongs to the people. Our country is also a republic. This means we elect representatives to make the laws. Rights of citizens are protected by the Constitution. These include the right to vote and freedom of speech, protected under the Bill of Rights. The United Kingdom is a parliamentary democracy with a constitutional monarch. A king or queen is the head of state, and a prime minister is the head of government. The people vote in elections for Members of Parliament to represent them.

While both these nation states fall within the democratic framework, they differ in some significant ways. For one, while the American system is essentially a two-party democracy, the British system is a multi-party one. Both of them being equally powerful and have separate designated roles to play. On the other hand, the British system is what is called a “unitary” one, the parliament being the sole legislative body. While the federal system of the US, assigns specific roles that are designated for the Senate and the

The U.S. House of Representatives and the British House of Commons have a great deal in common. Each house is made up of representatives elected by the people. In both systems control of the lower house goes to the party that has the most seats. Under the U.K. system, the leader of the party with the most seats becomes the Prime Minister and the official head of the government. Under the U.S. system this person would be the Speaker of the House. One other key difference is elections. Under the parliamentary system, the prime minister can go to the crown at any point and ask to dissolve Parliament. If this is done an election