Difference Between Free Will And Aristotle

At the same time, the Libertarians believe that people have “free will”, and there are no such inevitable results of those behaviors that are controlled by “free will”. Libertarianism has different meanings in different academic fields. From the general level, the libertarianism refers to people’s ability to decide whether or not to do something according to their

Harry G. Frankfurt addresses the concern of moral responsibility regarding the actions of an agent and the notion of free-will in his article Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility. I will first present “the principle of alternate possibilities”, as Frankfurt describes, and explain its relation to free-will along with the concept of moral responsibility. Afterwards I will incorporate Frankfurt’s argument that “the principle of alternate possibilities” is false and explain how one can still be held morally responsible even under certain circumstances, under threat, if the agent had an intent. Finally, I will propose that intention does not constitute an action and thus one would still not be morally responsible.

The ethical issues presented in this case are the different views that each individual has on how the idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR). This dispute is between Mr. Milton Friedman, John Mackey, and T.J. Rodgers; all of which has a different outlook on CSR. The definition of CSR refers to the responsibilities that business has to the society in which it operates and to those actions that a business can be held accountable. Most philosophers have come up with three different types of responsibilities that corporations can be held accountable for. The first and most important of the three is a corporation’s duty to not cause harm. If a corporation can

“Libertarianism is the view that each person has the right to live his life in any way he chooses so long as he

Aristotle's assessment of an individual’s actions depends to some extent on whether those actions are voluntary, involuntary, or non-voluntary (37). Actions that are involuntary when it is executed under pressure and causes distress to the individual exploiting. One feels there are state cases, as when someone is compelled to do something dishonorable under threat, but we should reflect on such events voluntary since the individual is still in restraint of their behaviors. One believes if something is done in the case of ignorance may be called involuntary if the individual later recognizes that ignorance, but it is non-voluntary if the person does not understand or endure pain for such awareness (Aristotle 38-39). However, lack of knowledge

Corporations can be large or small but they all have some sort of ethical impact on their employees, shareholders, customers, community, and surrounding environments. Richard DeGeorge writes, “We can speak of corporations having moral responsibilities to act in certain ways, and they are morally responsible for the consequences of their actions on people.” (p. 200). Large corporations are comprised of the board of directors, management, and their workers. They also deal with suppliers, customers, and have competitors. This essay will examine the moral responsibilities within a corporation.

The main concept of libertarianism is individualism, where libertarians see every individual as their own person capable of making choices and being held responsible for their actions (Boaz 1997, 12). Individual rights are held to a high account, with each person having the right to be secure in life, property and liberty through virtue of being human (Boaz 1997, 12). Order in society is another core concept, developing from the integration of people and coordination within trade (Boaz 1997, 13). The rule of law argues that people are free to do what they want, as long as they do not interfere with another person’s life (Boaz 1997, 13). A limited

According to Aristotle, we are morally responsible for our actions. Through the analysis of notions and concepts such as responsibility in terms of voluntary/involuntary actions, incontinence, and intemperance, we can further understand Aristotle’s stance, which is that we are morally responsible for our actions, and character. I will not only be exploring Aristotle’s views, but also the views of Dr. Dian Hsieh, and Jonathan Barnes, who both reconstruct an argument for moral responsibility from Aristotle’s work. In addition, I will also contrast aspects of Aristotle’s view on moral responsibility, with Jean-Paul Sartre’s views on the matter as portrayed in Existentialism Is A Humanism, in an attempt to improve upon and reveal potential problems

In this essay, I will argue in favor of Augustine’s theory that God did not create evil but rather the origin of evil stems from the nature of free will and mankind’s autonomy to choose sinful actions over good actions. I agree with this argument because it provides humans with the freedom to have control over their actions and to be judge by the content of those actions. If the notion of free will did not exist our fundamental understanding of crime and punishment would not exist because human beings could not be held responsible for the evils they have committed.

Corporate responsibility is ultimately about the reasons and ways in which a company sets its values, moral standards, ethical considerations and states an organizational purpose that is based in greater societal good. After this course, I believe the “best practice” of corporate responsibility in a high tech global economy leverages several course methodologies but ultimately 1) the tenets of Gilligan’s Ethics of Care model which balances care for self (or corporation) and care for others, 2) takes triple bottom approach to running a company considering financial performance, social practices and environmental impact and 3) ultimately one defined by Porter and Kramer’s Corporate Shared Value (“CSV”) where economic success is based on a model where societies’ needs are addressed and improved. CSV allows the self-interest necessary for a company to thrive in a competitive and fast changing environment. At the same time, CSV considers that the end game is about creating shared value. Altogether, my definition of the “best practice” of corporate responsibility happens when the company’s bottom line and society’s bottom line are simultaneously served because the societal needs are also at the center of the company’s profit driven goals.

Saying that a corporation has no social or moral responsibility to engage in, is untrue. A company should be looking at its host nation laws and regulations, the laws and regulations of its market countries, and its desired Code of Ethics of both its employees and leadership. By implicating that a company’s responsibility has borders or boundaries is a true statement because there may not be reciprocity between nation’s regulations. This does not mean that it exonerates the company from honoring the host nation laws.

Corporate social responsibility can be defined as the "economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary expectations that society has of organisations at a given point in time" (Carroll and Buchholtz 2003, p. 36). The concept of corporate social responsibility means that organizations have moral, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities in addition to their responsibilities to earn a fair return for investors and comply with the law. A traditional view of the corporation suggests that its primary, if not sole, responsibility is to its owners, or stockholders. However, CSR requires organisations to adopt a broader view of its responsibilities that includes not only stockholders, but many other constituencies as well, including

A company’s ethical responsibility refers to the fact that companies are supposed to act in a fair and just way even though there is no legal requirement. Business decision-making should consider the ethical expectations of different stakeholders. Philanthropy is the highest level of responsibility, which requires the company make entirely voluntary contributions to society, e.g. making donations to the charity or developing advanced technologies to protect the environment. The public do not have specific expectations of such behaviour, so it depends on the company’s choice.

Corporate Social Responsibility encompasses the economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary expectations that society has of an organization at any given point in time (Carrol & Buchholtz, 2015). Corporate Social Responsibility is considered by many to take into account the impact the firm has on society, and also requires the individual to consider his or her actions in terms of the whole social system, and holds him or her responsible for the effects resulting of the acts of that individual (Carrol & Buchholtz, 2015). In other words, it is the obligation of the firm to be responsible in producing and manufacturing of all of its products and services for the safety of the customers.

Classical capitalism has been the basic inspiration for business. In this view, a business is socially responsible if it maximizes profits while operating within the law. Today the classical ideology still commands the economic landscape, but ethical theories of broader responsibility have worn down its prominences.