Difference Between Joint Training And Jointness

Furthermore RAF/BCTs have tactical benefits. A regional alignment concept results in the identification and resourcing of the proper regional studies, training towards language proficiency and cultural awareness. The requirement for these skill resulted from the experiences and outcomes of wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Culture and language awareness training gives U.S. forces a better improved understanding of the operational environment, an asset critically beneficial in contemporary combat environments .

Regionally Aligned Brigades/Forces is the vision of the Chief of Staff of the Army and the Secretary of the Army that will provide combatant command with constantly readily available troops that are versatile and responsive. Regionally Aligned Forces are based on an organizing principle that allows the United States (U.S.) Army to provide units that maintain core war-fighting skills complimented with cultural awareness training, language training, and regional expertise. A revised ARFOGEN cycle based on Active Component and 60-month Reserve Component sequence will replace the current Army model. Mission specific training requirements will be communicated, based on combatant command’s require¬ments, and organized through FORSCOM. These

The transformation in military thought towards employment of forces across multi-domain operations battlespace is based on the current threats

Being at war for the last 14 years the Army now finds it has the best trained and the most combat experienced force in its history. However, the intense focus on a relatively small number of mission sets such as irregular warfare detracts resources for the other missions required by Geographic Combatant Commander (GCC). To address this shortfall, the Chief of Staff of the Army General Ray Odierno directed implementation of the Regional Alignment of Forces (RAF) concept as means to address Combatant Command’s (CCMD) requirements. Regional alignment of Army units provides the GCC assigned units for a dedicated period , capable of executing myriad of specified missions as outlined in their Lines of Effort

The United States Army is undergoing a period of transition as it seeks to build and maintain a flexible force. As a result, the organization is studying potential changes to its structure and composition of its brigade combat teams. As part of the ongoing analysis to explore alternatives between three-battalion and two-battalion brigade compositions, the organization is considering the possibility of examining the entire force in design and structure. The need for such changes has been fueled by the growing need for improvement of security forces as they tackle threats to national security. In addition to this, there have been various calls for initiatives that are geared towards changing the United States Army officer culture through management rather than understanding process. Through a process of understanding instead of management, the U.S. Army officer culture will shift from mere risk aversion to uncertainty intolerance.

The Army is in a period of transitioning to a new construct on how it trains and employs Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs). This new idea is called Regionally Aligned Forces (RAFs). The basic concept for RAFs is to align BCTs to a Combatant Commander (COCOM) for use as needed by that COCOM. By being aligned to a COCOM, the BCT and its respective Soldiers will receive specific region cultural and language training and also be provided specific training focus as determined by that COCOM. On a rotational basis units within those regionally aligned BCTs will deploy to their designated region to support the COCOM and in return the unit and Soldiers receive invaluable experiences and realistic training. This essay is to discuss how the Army’s move to RAFs is a great strategic move for the Army on many fronts. Listed are a few of the fronts that the transition to regionally aligned forces addresses. As the Army draws down its forces in Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) it has to find ways to remain relevant and useful in a time of budget reductions, smaller conflicts and greater uncertainty across the Department of Defense (DoD). With the reduction in size of the Army and the contraction of forces stationed abroad, there needs to be a plan to address this cultural exposure our forces are losing. In addition, the Army needs to preserve the lessons learned over a decade at war and not fall back into a garrison mindset where realistic training becomes unrealistic and worthless.

Proper training provides any organization with the fundamental base for successful operations. The importance of training is even more crucial when teams are expected to deploy in small elements and provide commanders with operational and strategic options for the conduct of UW. The modern Jedburghs provide Joint Force Commanders with the capability to conduct the most difficult aspects of UW campaigns by understanding, influencing, and shaping the operational environment, deterring adversary forces, and when necessary, defeating threats to U.S. national security. The operational tempo that 4th BN’s face today obstructs from the operator’s ability to receive advanced unconventional warfare training, military training directly related to the

The future operational environment: The evolution of war has become more complex. The enemy now has capabilities to attack from unknown position or may even blend in with the local population. The operational environment is changing at an accelerating speed and requires leaders to remain in a cognitive mindset at all times.

Joint operations have certain critical functions that help utilize all the tools necessary to operate and fight jointly. Use of joint operations and joint functions is imperative at operational and strategic levels of military operations. During all joint missions, Joint Operations Planning Process (JOPP) and Joint Intelligence Planning of the Operating Environment (JIPOE) are critical. Each function within JOPP and each step within JIPOE help the commander make critical decisions. These decisions eliminate confusion and assist subordinate commanders in their mission planning. It also ensures all elements are aware of each other, their mission as well as the overall mission and the commander’s intent.

“Jointness implies cross-Service combination wherein the capability of the joint force is understood to be synergistic, with the sum greater than its parts (the capability of individual components). The joint force is a values based organization. The character, professionalism, and values of our military leaders have proven to be vital for operational success.” [JP-1 pg ix]

Unity of effort imperative is the definition of the coordination and cooperation of the Joint Forces toward common objectives. Unity of Effort is the integration and synchronization of the Joint Forces with the purpose of optimizing their logistic processes and capabilities. This imperative requires an effective understanding of the process and procedures in order to all partners involved can identify the roles, responsibilities, and authorities in a Joint Force. Thus, Unity of Effort support the JFC in the organizations planning, executing, and managing tasks. The level of synchronization of the Unity of effort goes through foster opportunity to integrate strategic, operational, and tactical levels.

544). According to Ansell and Gash’s contingency theory of collaboration, there are five important variables of interest that make collaborations effective, and they include: prior history, incentives, power and resources, leadership, and the collaborative process. In addition to these variables, there are four important factors in the collaborative process that require purposeful management by leaders and stakeholders involved. These include face-to-face dialogue, trust building, commitment, and shared understanding. Although all these contribute to successful collaborations, there are three contingencies that could impact their success – time, trust, and interdependence. There are six elements that make collaborative effort collaborative governance: initiated by public agencies or institutions; participants include non-state actors; participants engage directly in decision making; formally organized and meets collectively; decisions are made by consensus; and the focus is on public policy or public

Joint warfare and units of forces allows the forces to be able to adapt to new and modern patterns of war. During the war, an opportunity to grab and have an understanding of the war and the tactics and not just the individual war departments or unit where they will have different deals and tactics which may in turn not have any synchronization in the pattern of execution. The joint unit can handle different aspects of war like the Navy, Air force separately through the air, the military on the ground, and all working at the same time together will reduce the time of operation and make it faster. Joint forces would also be advantageous due to the monetary aspects, whereby the monetary systems

2. Provide as much information as possible about the training program and purpose prior to actual training.

To coordinate political, intelligence, social, cultural and economic activities in rela-tion to general defense/security policies.