Difference Between Policy Decision And Objectives Of China

• When engaging in international trade, China focuses on the business arrangement, not its political implications. Do you think the United States should act more like China, strengthening its economy by fostering mutually beneficial partnerships with foreign countries that do not promote democracy or fair labor practices?

The recent interactions of emerging and established states suggest that the existing standards of the current global economy are shifting. According to Stewart Patrick in his article “Irresponsible Stakeholders? The Difficulty of Integrating Rising Powers,” the United States must accommodate for emerging states within the global economy and refrain from enforcing their values of an open and liberal international economy in order to achieve effective cooperation. Similarly, Andrew Nathan and Andrew Scobell argue in their article “How China Sees America: The Sum of Beijingʻs Fears” that as China gains more influence within the global economy, the United States will have to respond appropriately to maintain its economic values. Both articles ultimately assert that

The following examines the nation of China and its trade relations with the world, particularly the United States. The focus is primarily on China’s culture and how it impacts business dealings with other countries. Areas examined include: Religion, Management Philosophy, and Business Etiquette. Also discussed is China’s growing status as a world super power and how that has impacted the global business landscape. Likewise, various trading partners are examined and the effects of doing business with China, specifically for the United States. Points of concern for the United States are things such as the

And with this strong role China has been assuming, so has it been getting stronger by building military equipment competitive with those of the U.S. and drawing narrower a military gap it once possessed when compared to America’s armed forces. Furthermore, China has “displaced the United States as the world’s leading manufacturing nation” in 2010 (US Foreign Policy, pg. 414). Not a surprise since a majority of products purchased in the U.S. carry a label stating, “Made in China.” And predictions hold China as the world’s largest economy by year 2041 (US Foreign Policy, pg. 415). Thus, the fact that China has become an emergence matters. Since the dismantled of the Soviet Union, the U.S. was not challenged, when it came to power by any other competitor, however now, the U.S. dominance in international politics has to deal with a China that has the capabilities to lead the world’s economy.

This quote highlights the essential cooperative relationship between the U.S. and China through both the regional and global scales. With China as the economic powerhouse in the global economy and the U.S. as the world’s policeman, it is clear that both countries hold major powers in the world and their cooperation is important in addressing the global challenges. However, the relationship between U.S. and China is becoming increasingly complex and competitive. The two countries share a lot of common interest in achieving peace and stability around the world, but they often disagree on the process of attaining those goals due to the different perspectives. It’s also important to point out that these two countries are more cooperative outside

It's prevalent to affirm that the China and the United States relationship have improved over serval decades; nevertheless, both countries does not seem to play by the same rules. China censorship and apply heavy laws and regulations to benefit its local industry over the rest of the world's organizations in an apparent unfair manner; having said that, the Hofstede’s individualism cultural dimension sets China as a collaborative nation and the United States as an individualistic nation. With this precedent, would you think that a third party or mediator could be the driver that allows both nations to collaborate and coordinate their agenda?

The volume of trade had doubled, indicating growing economic dependence with one another. Therefore, economic interdependence has facilitated to create a strong mutual interest between the United States and China. Although, there may be some inevitable disruptions between them such as North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, the economic interdependence will continue to bring them together, constraining any tendencies toward conflict.

The United States and China have had a long history of diplomatic relations in the past few hundred years. Their history can go as far back to when the U.S. was a newly founded country back in the late 18th century but within the past century, these two countries have faced more difficulties on what their governments see eye-to-eye over.

On September 25th, 2015, Chinese President Xi Jinping made a state visit to the United States in a gesture meant to reciprocate United States President Barack Obama’s trip to Beijing last November in 2014. The visit served as an opportunity to bolster US-China relations and cooperation among a variety of global and bilateral issues, endeavoring to close their discord and strive for progress. It also served as a strategic move to improve the relationship between America and China so that they stay on track with their Bilateral Investment Treaty negotiations. The two leaders both addressed issues such as China’s alleged cyberespionage, military relations, people to people exchange, and China’s act of intimidation in the off the Alaskan coast. Moreover, Xi Jinping intended to meet with American tech leaders with a desire to boost the economies of both nations. The question at hand is the measure of success this visit and to what extent it lived up to its intention of “expanding and deepening cooperation”. If I were to put this visit up to a scale of 1 to 10, I’d rate it a 7/10 which is what I’d like to call “success with caution”. There are many aspects of the visit that I believe greatly improved US-China relations. On the other hand, there are gray areas

According to Bergsten, “unless China is careful such a regional grouping would almost certainly trigger a sharp backlash from the U.S. and EU, as well as from numerous developing countries, who view this as discrimination against them.” The test for the U.S. is how to deal with this matter while still fostering positive relations with its Chinese’s trading partner. The National Security Strategy released by the White House states, “We welcome a China that takes on a responsible leadership role in working with the United States and the international community to advance priorities like economic recovery.“ My concern is whether this is a goal shared by China due to their numerous interactions with other nations in the region. When it comes to the global economy, this much is true: 2009 was China’s year. In the first decade of the 21st century, China established itself as the world’s workshop. The next decade (if things go right) could see China emerge as the world’s leading exporter of capital and military muscle. China (not including Hong Kong) has become the largest trading partner of Taiwan and the second largest trading partner of Japan. The hope is increased economic trade between these nations will elevate some of the political tension recently experienced. The Peoples Republic of China (PRC) has become South Korea’s largest foreign investment destination and largest export market. According to Taiwanese and Korean data, in

The rapid rise in economy of China has turned this country into rival of America. However, in an effort to change the trade policies of China, stop military operations reinforce Beijing 's South China Sea from America, but that’s not enough improve diplomatic relations with 11 countries in the TPP agreement. Beijing said the United States is a force only in Asia as they want, while China will forever be a force in Asia. As candid statement of the Prime Minister of Singapore Lee Hsien Loong during his visit to Washington last August, the TPP will "challenge the prestige" of the United States with partners in the region. According to Mr. Li, each nation has faced some opposition political and sensitive issue in the country, pay a political price to get to the negotiating table and signed agreements but finally they cannot receive what they want. Now, United State diplomats do not have what they want in Asia, After the US told the regional partners was signed TPP will strengthen America 's leadership position in the region, the regional partner also concluded to be a waiver of TPP would undermine America 's leadership position and China is ready to be leadership position which vacated this area. In terms of the overall situation of power in Asia, the US withdrew from the TPP, that means United State is bringing the beneficial strategy for China, not only because a trade agreement supported by the United States, U.S foreign policies will be disappear forever

The United States of America and China have a complex relationship that has been created through years of interaction. There have been times of great trade and trust between the countries but there has also been great tension. Today America and China trade freely between each other. However, the countries do not completely trust one another due to their opposing views on foreign policy and ideology. These past incidents have created an odd combination of opinions in China and the United States. In my opinion, the economic freedom between the states is stable, but the political scene is unclear and unbalanced.

According to President Obama in the 2015 National Security Strategy, the scope of our cooperation with China is unprecedented, even as we remain alert to China’s military modernization. The evolving security environment in the PACOM area of responsibility is initiating the shift of our focus and forces to the Indo-Asia-Pacific region. Over the next 5 years, nearly half of all growth outside the United States is expected to come from Asia, and as reported by Global Trends 2030, China will contribute about one-third of global growth by 2025, far more than any other country. This growth is vital to United States economic and security interests, and China’s activities in this region will likely shape much of our nation’s future; however, recent trends may prove establishing a peaceful long-term relationship challenging. Admiral Locklear stated before the House Appropriations Committee-Defense Subcommittee on PACOM Posture in March 2015 that recent statements by senior Chinese leaders, such as President Xi Jinping, suggest that China may be attempting to advance a vision for an alternative security architecture in Asia that affords Beijing increased influence in the region and diminishes the role of the United States. This is exhibited in

Many years of strong economic growth and smart exporting strategies has allowed China to come close to surpassing the U.S. economy. China is currently in its 13th Five-Year-Plan, which is China’s economic guideline. In this five-year plan, which covers 2016-2020, China intends to focus on innovation and encourage foreign investment (The 13th, n.d). China’s focus on innovation will challenge U.S. manufacturers attempting to do the same. Should China enact policies more open to outside investment, it will likely allow the U.S. to strengthen US-China relations and improve its economic stance through foreign investment in China.

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has become more integrated and willing to cooperate within the global political and economic systems than ever in its history. However, there is growing apprehension in the Asia-Pacific region and the U.S. in regards to the consequences of rising in economic and military power in China. Descriptions about Chinese diplomacy in the policy and scholarly are less positive lately concerning China’s obedience to regional and international rules. There was little debate in the U.S. and elsewhere in regards to whether China was or was not part “the international community.” Scholars and experts in the early 1990s have contended