Relativism Vs Universalism Essay

The effects of culture in shaping individuals are systematic and may lead to the predominance of distinctive social types in different cultures. On the one hand, universalism States that the more the culture of "primitive" which eventually evolved to then have a system of law and equal rights with Western culture. The effects of culture in shaping individuals are systematic and may lead to the predominance of distinctive social types in different cultures. (Donnelly, 2016). Cultural relativism, on the other hand, to the contrary, namely that of a traditional culture cannot be changed. However, cultural relativism also occurs in Western countries like the USA. The reality is that no country or culture readily accepts the imposition of a ‘‘universal’’ human right when that right clashes with indigenous viewpoints. (Reichert, 2006). Here is a further discussion about the two ' ideology

Human rights are rights innate to every single individual, whatever our nationality, where you live, sex, national or ethnic birthplace, color of skin, religion, dialect/language, and many more. We are all similarly qualified for our human rights without segregation. These rights are altogether interrelated, associated and resolute. Widespread human rights are regularly communicated and ensured by law, in the types of treaties, standard global law, general standards and different wellsprings of international. International human rights law sets down commitments of Governments to act in certain routes or to cease from specific acts, keeping in mind the end goal to advance and secure human rights and central flexibilities of people or

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, categories all human beings as free. Article one identify all human beings as born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article two states, Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust,

The concepts of Universalism and Relativism are fundamental to Justice Studies insofar as the perceptions of justice/injustice heavily rely on either one of these points of view. To be sure, Universalism considers everything is equal in its natural state. Conversely, the concept of Relativism (the antithesis of Universalism) posits that everything is variable, or, situational. “The universalistic conception of distributive justice, rules are held to be just and unalterable regardless of context. The relativistic conception is that rules are just only in particular situations and are alterable according to context” (Kashima et.al, 1987, p. 51).

Human rights as stated in the universal declaration of human rights is that every human is born with equal rights no matter what sex, age, race or sexuality they are. It also means every person is protected by and under this law no matter what.

All throughout history African Americans have been discriminated against and always been at a disadvantage, whether it be in the courtroom, with police officers, or just trying to be a normal American citizen. Recently many minority players are taking a stand against the prejudice injustices that they face on an everyday basis. In response to the injustices they face, using their national fame, the athletes are raising awareness by taking a knee during the National Anthem, in an attempt to peacefully protest. This bold form of protest has only occurred a handful amount of times, because of not only the national criticism that is to follow but the repercussions as well. Many American citizens, veterans and government officials are taking

On a global political stand point there was a uniting of ideas and governments; what we know today as the United Nations (UN). One of the main ideas which the UN has grown up around is ‘The individual possess rights simply by virtue of being Human’ (The Universal Declaration of human rights); which was adopted by the general assembly in 10th December 1948. This statement is reflect in the core principles

According to the United Nations, human rights are defined as “rights inherent to all human beings, whatever their nationality, place of residence, sex, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, language, or any other status. Humans all equally entitled to human rights without discrimination. These rights are all interrelated, interdependent and indivisible.”

The difference between utilitarianism and relativism is: Utilitarianism suggests that “rightness” comes in different levels and one action can be “righter” than the other. For example, A person can win a large amount of money from the lottery and give family members that may need some help, or they can donate most of it to charities which could help allot of people in need. Giving the money to family may feel good but donating the money to people that really needs it would be the “better” thing to do because it would be good for those people. This would be the “righter” and least selfish thing to do which, would mentally make that person feel like they did the better or “righter thing”. Relativism suggests that one action can be righter than

There are two main ways that people look at Human Rights: as universal rights or relative rights. What do each of those mean, and does universality or relativism matter (i.e. does it matter where the rights came from, or does it matter that we have a general agreement that people should have human rights?).

Ethical universalism and ethical relativism are two types of meta-ethical views, meaning the two theories attempt to understand the reason behind ethical properties, attitudes, boundaries and judgements. Ethical universalism can be viewed as an ideal world, while ethical relativism explains a more realistic perspective on why different cultures can view the same actions differently. The two delve more into the essential meaning of a theory rather than just simply labeling actions as right or wrong.

The Journal, “Cultural Relativist and Feminist Critiques of International Human Rights – Friends or Foes?, by Oonagh Reitman seeks to address about the similarities between two critiques of international human rights that come from both cultural relativist and feminist. The critique comes from the claim that human rights are universal and both cultural relativist and feminist disagree about the universalism in human rights. The author argue that whether feminist and cultural relativist is friends or foes regarding that both of them are same in criticizing the international human rights but at the same situation they oppose each other in the realm of women’s international human rights. In the section 1 of the paper, it already explained about

The doctrine of human rights were created to protect every single human regardless of race, gender, sex, nationality, sexual orientation and other differences. It is based on human dignity and the belief that no one has the right to take this away from another human being. The doctrine states that every ‘man’ has inalienable rights of equality, but is this true? Are human rights universal? Whether human rights are universal has been debated for decades. There have been individuals and even countries that oppose the idea that human rights are for everybody. This argument shall be investigated in this essay, by: exploring definitions and history on human rights, debating on whether it is universal while providing examples and background

“All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.” These opening words of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights express a concept of man which underpins the framework of human rights embodied in the Universal Declaration and the two international covenants of Human Rights. Western political traditions is a concept that it derives from, is in harmony with moral and social teachings to be found in many other traditions and patterns of belief.

If we look at the world today, there are millions of cultures centered everywhere. With this much cultures in the world, everyone is bound to believe that they’re all different. Even though they are different in some aspects, all of them are similar to each other in some way. So if this is the case, do we as human beings have the right to judge these cultures as ethically wrong or just a cultural difference? Cultural Relativism is the belief that we cannot judge the cultural practices of other societies and that we should let them do as they please. But if we cannot judge them, does it make it right when they threaten the lives of others? Through the book Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe, we begin to have a deeper insight this idea of