Difference Between Relativist And Feminism

This essay will outline the position of feminists and cultural relativists and demonstrate the similarities between them, namely the common ground of human rights discourse. It is my contention that both can work together to make inclusive changes to the way they interpret and understand the human rights violations of women and work to assure the protection of women’s human rights. This essay will suggest that there is enough common ground between these two approaches to provide a solid foundation where feminists and cultural relativists can combine their insights to create a more inclusive, adaptable critique of the mainstream international human rights discourse. Working together, they can have a greater impact on international human rights discourse and the actualization of the human rights of

At present, women’s issues have occupied a special place in periodicals, literature and art. In spite of the fact that both international and national legislative acts proceed from the principle of equality, in practice women do not enjoy equal rights in public life. There is a noticeable contradiction between the new needs and the lack of conditions in society for their satisfaction: the social consciousness of women increases, they no longer satisfy the stereotype of social roles imposed on them, where the family and motherhood are the only values. The answer to the existing contradictions is found in the women's movements. I'm not an adherent of feminism because I do not think that now women have less rights than men. Several decades ago, there really was a division between men and women, when women were without human rights. In modern society, most women have the right to vote, the right to choose and enjoy the same rights as men; hence the movement itself, in my opinion, is not relevant in the 21st century. On the other hand, there are a couple of religions that consider women unequal with men, and only in this case I support feminism as a movement for women’s rights. So, I do not consider women worse than men and I do not think, that a woman can be used as a thing. “This is particularly clear when cultures openly discriminate against women and attempt to deny them the rights to

When it comes to Human Rights, there are many different views and approaches. There are many different theorists and concepts behind Human Rights. It is a very important topic as it does deal with everyone’s rights within society. There are many differnent perspectives when it comes to Human Rights but there are two in which are both opposing to each other and will be discussed. There is communitarianism and cosmopolitanism that both explain their position on human rights. Many theorists will either side with one view or another as they are opposites and makes it difficult to agree with both. The "Handbook of Human Rights" edited by Thomas Cushman explains the communitarian perspective through Amitai Etzioni, and the cosmopolitanism perspective through Robert Fine.

Inequality between the sexes is evident. Throughout history, many events took place with the aim to expand women’s rights. These events, as well as the ideologies involving inequality, create the feminist movements. In retrospect, many rights have been granted for women since the rise of the notion of gender imbalance. However—many issues involving the advocacy for women’s rights and the thinking behind it still exist today.

On the subject of feminism, there must be broader look at the unique circumstances that people have encountered throughout their lives and how each of them deals with such matters. According to the authors, a transnational feminist analysis requires intersectionality between race and gender. A call to action will be to form of new perspective on the issues that surround women and specially women of color. Instead of focusing on analyzing feminism through a western lens, such as global sisterhood, feminism should ensure the integration of all the aspects of women in different regions of the world. This sisterhood then leads to the concern of basing the western experience upon non-western people and it creates more internalized stereotypes.

The method that author use is a cooperative approach in order to finding the lessons which should be learnt to fix the relationship between the two sets of critique and to help the enforcement of women’s human rights. The approach that author favour is to make feminists and relativists to work together and rather than viewing each other as enemies, it would be better if both join together to take serious their respective crtitques of human rights. The author wants that feminists and relativists be more serious and respect each other’s positions since both of them emphasizing the same eseential value although in differing degrees. Furthermore, the author suggest how the strategic element of this approach might translate into practice in relation to the aims of cultural relativists because they should seek endorsement of their policies by women. It would not be easy in the application but they have to examining their respective tendencies towards esssentialism and prove that they do not have any other hidden interest unrelated to the critique of gender equality and diversity of culture so that they can proceed a multidimensional, respectful, and sensitive approach which promotes the dignity of the “woman of culture” (Reitman 1997:

The purpose of this paper is to analyze to main questions. The first part of the paper will define transnational feminism and identify key factors within a transnational perspective. Another part will be discussing some transnational feminist critiques of mainstream “white/Western” feminism and will also give ideas that a transnational feminist would suggest in order to make positive changes for women. The second part of the paper will choose two concepts to define, as well as discuss how they relate to one another from a transnational perspective. In addition, the relation of how they related to gender or affect the political, social, and/or economic status of women in the world will be analyzed.

In the first reading, “Women’s Studies and Transnational Feminism,” the author discusses how beneficial it would be to have a global perspective from women all around the world and their personal stories. It would bring greater change if women’s stories weren’t only heard mainly from the U.S, but rather told by international women about their experience with oppression and way of living. According to the author the viewpoint of all the women globally is described as “transnational”, a way of challenging current basic understandings of supposed everyday women (specifically western women) and fighting to reconstruct this system to become an advantage to other women around the world. Rather than focusing on “global feminism” which doesn’t

Most of the issues in Jaggar’s article stem from the style of her writing rather than the actual content in the article. Although she does contradict herself a few times, which will be discussed later in the paper, for the most part she does back up each of her claims with enough evidence. She does clearly state her four driving theses in her article. They are as follows: the first, “injustice by culture” the second, “autonomy of culture,” the

In the ancient world, little efforts were made to protect the rights of women in the society. In most societies, the nature and capabilities of women were disregarded. Women were not accorded the right to own property, right to vote, access to higher education and suffrage. These are some of the fundamental rights enjoyed by men in the society. In a bid to advocate and campaign for these rights, feminism was born. By definition, feminism is social and political movements which unified women around a number of issues which affected them. Spearheaded by feminists, these movements campaigned for women’s rights highlighted above among others. They have worked towards promoting historical changes for women’s rights and their autonomy as well

A Vindication of the Rights of Woman Summary and Analysis of Chapter I: The Rights and Involved Duties of Mankind Considered

Human rights which include the right to life and liberty as well as freedom that belong to all human beings inherently despite of their statuses without discrimination (United Nations, 1948). Among issues of human rights, women’s rights could be one of the most serious ones. In the 1990s, women’s rights were not generally accepted as human rights and suffered various violations (Bunch, 1990). Despite women’s rights have been improved so far in most regions that female have almost equal employment opportunities and enhanced status in society, the issues of female rights need to be considered because they still have inferior positions compared with men in workplace and society due to a lot of factors.

The doctrine of human rights were created to protect every single human regardless of race, gender, sex, nationality, sexual orientation and other differences. It is based on human dignity and the belief that no one has the right to take this away from another human being. The doctrine states that every ‘man’ has inalienable rights of equality, but is this true? Are human rights universal? Whether human rights are universal has been debated for decades. There have been individuals and even countries that oppose the idea that human rights are for everybody. This argument shall be investigated in this essay, by: exploring definitions and history on human rights, debating on whether it is universal while providing examples and background

Here are the review of a journal titled “Cultural Relativist and Feminist Critiques of International Human Rights – Friends or Foes” the journal mostly discussed on both perspective, from the Cultural Relativism perspective and also from the Feminist perspective on International Human rights. Even though this journal emphasizing more and seeking for the similarities from the perspective of Cultural Relativist and Feminist but we can see from the journal that how those perspective from both side which are Cultural Relativist and Feminist have a contradiction with each other even though they criticizing the same actors which is the International Human.

First, for the one who believe on cultural relativism, the way they see universal human rights, they think it as the modern form of imperialism with the values and views of western (Reitman 1997, 104) and the relationship between cultural relativist with feminist is cultural relativist believe that feminist ‘protect the western notion of equality’ (Reitman 1997, 107) and feminist claim the universal rights according to the western perspective. Secondly, on the other hand, for the one who believe on feminism, they criticize that in the practice the universality has not been realized, they criticize that the only rights that only being protected are men’s rights and they feel that women still have not being yet included in the human rights (Reitman 1997, 104) and the relationship between feminist with cultural relativist is feminist believe that cultural relativist protect ‘a male notion of culture’ (Reitman 1997, 107) and cultural relativist seems to try to hampering the realization and enforcement of human rights of