preview

Difference Between Republicans And Democrats

Good Essays

There are two important topics, among many, which can cause republicans and democrats to lose their hair. These topics are discretionary spending and taxes, and are the two major components of an overarching subject called fiscal policy. When it comes to legislation related to fiscal policy, congress is willing to let the government partly shut down before taking a step into the other side of the political spectrum. An accurate analogy can give one a better understanding of the differences between two different things, and when it comes to fiscal policy, democrats are to hawks as republicans are to an anglerfish. More specifically, each political party treats American citizens much like these two animals treat their young. Anglerfish lay many …show more content…

Republicans and democrats are butting heads over how to reduce it. Democrats want to reduce it by raising taxes, especially on the highest earners, while republicans want to do it by cutting spending. Each party is super-glued to their respective stance. Just like two siblings fighting over a remote when neither of them likes the show that’s on; each kid would rather endure the terrible TV show than watch their sibling get what they want. Democrats believe in raising taxes so that they can spend more on social programs, thereby supporting the foundation of society, and keeping people from slipping through the cracks. Republicans believe in cutting spending so that taxes can be reduced, hard workers can be rewarded, and businesses can operate more freely. I believe that discretionary spending on the abovementioned social programs is an integral part of a country’s long-term success. If we can make that happen, and lower our deficit by marginally raising tax rates on the country’s highest earners, I think we should. People in the lower class naturally have fewer opportunities available to them, e.g., private education, families that are well connected in certain industries, etc. The lower their socioeconomic status, the harder it is for them, on average, to succeed. If we have programs in place that help them jump over those hurdles, then we can make use of their potential. Furthermore, I think we can do that without a significant increase in discretionary spending. We need a more precise cost-benefit analysis of our budget so that we only spend on things, like education, which will promote our country’s long-term success. We need a strict review of discretionary programs (e.g., scientific research projects, welfare, and social security) so that we know how to make them more selective, and efficient. At that point, small budget cuts can be made while we maintain the benefits of these

Get Access