preview

Compare And Contrast Safavid And Mughal Empires

Decent Essays

The great empires of history, particularly in Islamic history, were the Ottomans of Turkey, Safavids in Persia, and Mughals in India. This text will be a brief run-down of the times in which Selim I, Suleiman I and Jahangir ruled, in hopes that if become familiar with who these rulers were in terms of the characteristics of their leadership and authority, we can interpret a picture what the society was like at that time. The common facts that Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires shared was that they all originated in Turkish nomadic cultures of the steppe, the class which originally dominated the states and social hierarchy was a military aristocracy, they were Muslim led and it was their devotion to Islam that encouraged them to carry the faith to new lands, they were based on conquest and the use of military technologies, they began with absolutist rulers and efficient bureaucracies and they surprisingly did not rule predominantly Muslim populations. The differences between the empires laid up to their ruler’s opinions, achievements and decree for example rulers of the Safavid and Mughal Empires exerted even more spiritual authority than the others, forcing their citizens to subject to their beliefs of the religion, Ismail and the emergence of Shiism. In the Mughal Empire, conflicts between fathers and sons were frequent. The Safavids managed no better. A key instance of this is Sultan Suleiman I (1495-1566). He was Selim's son who ruled for 46 years and helped Ottoman

Get Access