Difference Between Sejong The Great And Kamehameha

I think he was a good ruler. It seemed like he was one of the best emperors. He kept everything so together and organized. Mostly, everyone liked him even though he might have not been liked by his enemies. He may not have expected to become early at such a young age because, of the passing away of his father and brother. I think he was a good ruler because, he took care of everyone so well and protected all of the land/his people.

In the beginning, Hawaii was unknown to any humans. Polynesians eventually came across its islands, and decided to make it their home. In the early days, each island was ruled by a chief, and many times the islands were in conflict with each other. Centuries like this passed, but then "in 1782, [Queen Lili'uokalani's] cousin Kamehameha set out to conquer and unite the islands". Thirteen years later, in 1795, Kamehameha

Louis XIV, Peter the Great, and Tokugawa Ieyasu all considered their own power and strengthened their states in many different ways but their actions were all similar. They united their states, introduced reforms and assessed their power and the effect that they could have on others. Although their techniques were different, the ways these monarchs ruled their states show great similarities.

Kamehameha was never going to be an ali’i (ruler) in his life. His life changed when he picked up a dead ali’i body. He acquired mana (power) and began conquering islands through war. Before he knew it, he was in control of all the Hawaiian Islands. Kamehameha was an effective leader because he had good relationships with people and was smart in his actions.

As important as education is to these two great historical figures, it doesn’t come easy. In my opinion Frederick had it much harder than Tzu for

Many great individuals have existed throughout history, but there are also those people who were the exact opposite of “great”. Akbar the Great and Louis XIV were both significant figures in the period from 1450 to 1750. Akbar the Great of India was born on October 15, 1542, in India while his father, Humayun, was in exile and became emperor at the age of 14 after his father’s death, ruling over the Mughal Empire until his own death in 1605. Furthermore, Louis XIV of France was born on September 5, 1638, to the Hapsburg Spanish Queen Anne of Austria and Louis XIII, king of France. After his father died when he was four and a half, Louis XIV came to the throne and ruled under a mentor until he was the proper age, then continued ruling

2. Contrast – In China, the Han rulers and people with the most power were the educated bureaucrats. India’s rulers were part of the ruling family who were leaders of the empire.

Each strove to maintain a centralized government. For Japan the leader was to be called an emperor or empress who could only be a part of the royal family if they were related to the Shinto sun goddess. As for Europe, the leader was to be called a king or a queen. Like Japan, not just anybody could become royalty. Kings and queens came from a long descent of an Imperial family. Tradition was that the first born son of the king would become the next ruler following the kings death. However, if no legitimate son were born then the daughter would become queen. In Europe, the royal family and institution was usually

Kamehameha was an effective ruler because he was caring. Kamehameha was caring because Kamehameha rebuild his land and cleaned the fishponds and making the taro patches (23). He also told the people to make long irrigation ditches (23). This is a good change and is also caring because recovering his land and the fishponds are very thankful to the people living there. And if Kamehameha didn’t fix the taro patches and make ditches, then the village or the land might have been really dirty and many people might have moved away from the place they were living. This is something that changed after the unification because Kamehameha changed the old land, fishponds, and built new things, such as the ditches.

King Kamehameha was a successful leader because he was smart. King was smart because he saw what the foreigners and then he did it to be on the same page and all

To commence, Cyrus the Great, who ruled most of Persia during the 500s, and King Ashoka , emperor of the Maurya Dynasty from 268 to 232 BCE, both shared similar characteristics that made them great rulers, yet had their differences that made them unique in their own way. Furthermore, both Ashoka and Cyrus the Great were both knowledgeable, respectable, and tolerated by their own people, making them extraordinary leaders. Although, in comparison Ashoka was much more aggressive due to his extreme fear factor on everyone and his strong Buddhist beliefs. In comparison, Cyrus was much more lovable, understandable, and did anything possible for his people. To conclude, both King Ashoka and Cyrus the Great, were both powerful and intrepid leaders

Kamehameha was truly an effective leader because he had a caring heart, his responsible to his land and his village, and his trustworthy words. With his characteristics he got villagers to trust him more, he gained a new role a administrator and made new kapus, and gained other governors loyalty with gifting them land. Therefore Kamehameha was an effective leader with all these characteristics. What Kamehameha did for Hawai’i back then was to unify all the lands and today with all the islands unified there is no violence in between the eight

The main difference between King Hammurabi and Emperor Justina are, Justina was an Emperor and Hammurabi was a king. Though at first this may not seem like a big difference, it is. They are different, because an emperor is the ruler of an empire. An empire is a group of countries that are controlled by one ruler. A king is the male ruler of an independent state; a country that has a royal family. Although they share some similarities, the differences between them are remarkable.

Alexander the Great and Qin Shi Huangdi had their respective accomplishments. Although with these three compared and main accomplishments the two emperors will be contrasted to determine who overall was the stronger emperor. First both conquered a good amount of land but Alexander the Great conquered much larger amounts of land, then Qin Shi Huangdi organized his empire to last longer and thrive compared to Alexander the Great's cities. Finally although both controlled and created great laws, Qin Shi Huangdi strategized and lead a better civilization. Even though Huangdi did not conquer as much land as Alexander the Great, Qin Shi Huangdi still was overall a better emperor.

Confucius has proved to be the greatest influence over the Chinese character. Besides being a great educationist, thinker and unsuccessful politician, he was first of all an intellect with a noble morality-He pursued truth, kindness and perfection throughout his life and his success and failure were largely due to his character, which had an everlasting Impact on Chinese intellect.